[ExI] Fwd: neurons

[Giovanni Santostasi]

In fact, one per second is resting for neurons. That is what happens when
you have slow waves oscillations that corresponds to the deepest state of
sleep.


On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:23 PM, William Flynn Wallace
<foozler83 at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> ​p.s.  Still, there are three states:  one in which the neuron fires at
> one per second (resting level - no input), one in which it fires faster
> (receiving excitatory input), and one in which it fires slower (receiving
> inhibitory input).​  So, firing or not firing is wrong in the context.
> bill w
>
>
> Well, OK, but the slowest they get is about one spike per second (up to
> 30) without external stimulation.  Not exactly resting.  bill w
>
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <
> gsantostasi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What you are thinking that neurons are at a particular potential when at
>> rest (about -70 mV). But they are not firing all the time at all. There are
>> times when they are silent.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:42 PM, William Flynn Wallace <
>> foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In The Future on the Mind, by Michio Kaku, he says as follows (facing
>>> page 342):
>>>
>>> "Define complex in terms of the total amount of information that can be
>>> stored.  The closet rival to the brain might be the info contained w/in our
>>> DNA.  Three billion base pairs containing one of four aids, therefore total
>>> amount of info is four to the three billionth power.  The brain can store
>>> much more - one hundred billion neurons, *which can either fire or not
>>> fire*.  Hence there are two raised to the one-hundred-billionth power
>>> initial states of the brain.... the states change every few milliseconds.
>>> A simple thought may contain  one hundred generations of neural firings.
>>> Hence there are two raised by one hundred billion, all raised to the
>>> hundredth power possible thoughts contained in one hundred generations.
>>> Brains are ceaselessly computing.  Therefore the total number of thoughts
>>> possible within N generations is two to the one-hundred-billionth power,
>>> all raised to the Nth power.
>>>
>>> My question concerns the underlined clause:  there are three states to a
>>> neuron:  increasing its rate, decreasing its rate, and staying the same.
>>> Kaku says that a neuron fires or not.  This seems to say that a neuron is
>>> idle, waiting for stimuli, whereas I think that no neuron ever is not
>>> firing.
>>>
>>> Am I confused again, or is he wrong?  bill w
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> extropy-chat mailing list
>>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20140520/0b61ad69/attachment.html>