[ExI] Strong AI Hypothesis: logically flawed?

[Ohad Asor]

Thanks,
I don't know what you meant exactly, but here's something cool
<http://www.is.tuebingen.mpg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/files/publications/TR_145_%5B0%5D.pdf>
by two of the coolest guys on earth.
Let me mention that the current theory of learning is so promising, as can
be shown just a part of it regarding VC Dimension & Popper in the linked
paper, that me personally, have no doubts regarding the future.
Science (at the sense of Popper) works, this is related to why PAC Learning
works, and in any case PAC generalizations are proven mathematically to
work.


On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:55 AM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Ohad Asor
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 27, 2014 3:20 PM
> *To:* ExI chat list
> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] Strong AI Hypothesis: logically flawed?
>
>
>
> Hi all, great to be here :)
>
>
>
> Hi Ohad, welcome.  Do tell us something cool about Ohad if you wish.
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20140928/e5d7a795/attachment.html>