[ExI] fermi paradox again, was: addiction

[William Flynn Wallace]

​<anders at aleph.se> wrote:

> You need 100% addiction, not 95% (and in humans, most things that are
> addictive only for about 5%).
>

I'd like to know where the 5% figure comes from.   I have to doubt that it
applies to all areas of addiction and if it distinguishes between chemical
dependency and psychological dependency.  bill w

​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150406/cd7aeeda/attachment.html>