[ExI] Religious Idiocy Triumphs Over Science Yet Again
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 19:12:13 UTC 2015
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:32 PM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] *On
> Behalf Of *William Flynn Wallace
> *…*
>
>
>
> >…There is a big difference between what we are doing here and what we
> can do publicaly. Right?
>
>
>
> This is publicly. Everything we write here is wide open and the internet
> never forgets. Every email should be assumed to be stored and hacked if it
> is valuable to anyone.
>
>
>
> >…While it may be intellectually defensible to criticize religions and
> cultures and ladies' hairdos, it can get downright dangerous to do so in
> their faces…
>
>
>
> By all means. Ladies with funny hair won’t kill you, people in weird
> cultures will not kill you. Of all the religions discussed on the
> internet, one will sue you and one will kill you. Notice that neither gets
> discussed much.
>
>
>
> >… We all might be on somebody's hit list if we go public with our
> opinions. bill w
>
>
>
> We are already on several hit lists. One of our own went to prison over
> internet criticism of one of the two religions mentioned in the previous
> comment. In the USA we had our own attorney general recently threaten
> legal repercussions against those who would criticize a culture:
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.buzzfeed.com/johnstanton/loretta-lynch-actions-predicated-on-violent-talk-toward-musl#.uddAV5VNBN
>
>
>
> Sheesh, how did we get here?
>
>
>
> spike
>
>
> OK, I read it and it is kind of frightening. We need a lawyer. I
> thought that advocating the overthrow of the USA by violence was the only
> restriction on free speech except for inciting riots, etc. The latter is,
> I suppose, what the Att. Gen is talking about. On that basis she could
> prosecute Trump.
>
>
When will people get the idea that free means free? Or that a handful of
Muslims do not necessarily characterize the ideas of the other billion of
them? Stimulus generalization gone berserk.
bill w
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20151210/42caab3b/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list