[ExI] Property rights to the summit/was Re: Religious Idiocy Triumphs Over Science Yet Again
Will Steinberg
steinberg.will at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 21:17:14 UTC 2015
Right, but if that's because they thought it was a god, the idea of owning
the land makes no sense. Land certificates don't exist in the same realm
as believing the land is a deity, maybe they thought the land owned them.
Though I'm sure their culture understands the concept of conquering
territory. But in this case, even though they did have an implicit
property rights system, it wouldn't have applied to the mountain.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20151214/29d3030e/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list