[ExI] Fail to the chief?/was Re: Religious Idiocy Triumphs Over Science Yet Again

[Tara Maya]

I see this as replacing our Executive (President), in the context of other forms of our government remaining consistent. So there would still be a Constitution, a Senate and a House. The council would be subject to the law, not above the law. 

I think it would be easier for a council to educate itself on technical issues, from testimony of experts, than for an electorate trying to vote on individual laws. Lawyers usually write those laws in such a way as to confuse the hurried voter, but it would be harder to easily bamboozle those who have the time to study the issue at greater leisure.

Checks and balances would still be in the system, and change would still proceed slowly. (Undoubtedly, this would be the main source of complaint about it from all sides, as it would mean that no one side ever gets its way—but that’s true of any good goveranance system). 

Tara Maya
Blog <http://taramayastales.blogspot.com/>  |  Twitter <https://twitter.com/taramayastales>  |  Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Unfinished-Song-Epic-Fantasy/310271375658211?ref=hl>  |  Amazon <http://www.amazon.com/Tara-Maya/e/B004HAI038/ref=sr_tc_2_0?qid=1349796143&sr=8-2-ent>  |  Goodreads <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2951879.Tara_Maya>



> On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:43 AM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com <mailto:tara at taramayastales.com>> wrote:
> One of the few serious alternatives to democracy that I’ve considered might work is a system of Representative Consensus. A council of twelve, rather like a jury, is chosen by random selection from the pool of eligible citizens, and they perform as the Executive, discussing decisions and coming to a conclusion by consensus. In rare cases where consensus could not be reached, the entire council would be re-drawn. (So it would be like the Ultimate Game, in that those groups who could not reach a compromise would be punished.)
> 
> What about issues where specific technical expertise is needed to make a good decision?  (Admittedly, that's not entirely solved in the current system either.)
> 
> More importantly, what about cases where a majority of the 12 represent views opposite the majority of the population, and take measures to extend their reign?
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20151216/e793110e/attachment.html>