[ExI] The Anti-Flynn
rex at nosyntax.net
Mon May 4 08:46:47 UTC 2015
rex <rex at nosyntax.net> [2015-05-02 10:35]:
>Rafal Smigrodzki <rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com> [2015-05-01 20:52]:
>> ### The cause of the demographic transition is still not entirely known.
>> The expectation of a dysgenic trend is however not dependent on the cause
>> of transition but rather on the verifiable negative correlation between IQ
>> and fitness since about 1850.
>The high IQ fraction of the population has historically had a lower birth rate
>than the lower IQ fraction, but it does not logically follow that there will
>be a dysgenic trend. This rather astonishing result is established in the paper
>referenced at the URL.
>Who would have guessed that it's possible for population IQ to
>increase while the low IQ fraction breeds at a higher rate than the
>high IQ fraction?
No one here finds a proof that population IQ may increase in spite
of the dull outbreeding the sharp worthy of comment? This result
seems patently impossible, but it's not.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves
up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened." --Winston Churchill
More information about the extropy-chat