[ExI] Existential Risks might be underestimated

Keith Henson hkeithhenson at gmail.com
Thu May 28 23:57:46 UTC 2015

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM, William Flynn Wallace
<foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com> wrote:
>> Again, I?d just like to point out there?s no proof more is not better.
>> You can assert it is not.
>> I hereby assert: More is better. The more humans the better. We don?t have
>> nearly enough yet to even imagine what will become.
>> We are still in the infancy of our sentience and haven?t even left the
>> cradle yet.
>> Tara Maya
> ?Define 'better'. I say we are polluting the planet far more than our
> species is worth.?
> ?  Fouling our nest, as if we are the only things in the universe worth
> anything.?

Bill you missed your cue.  "Leaving the cradle" refers to the point
where more humans live off planet (or perhaps are uploaded) than live
on it.


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list