[ExI] IQ and beauty

Rafal Smigrodzki rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 07:02:06 UTC 2015


James, you may want to peruse the analysis of this (chromosome X=IQ)
hypothesis I posted earlier.

The hypothesis is not true at all.

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:50 PM, James Mukasa <mukasajames30 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Very true...
> On Sep 14, 2015 8:20 PM, "PJ Manney" <pjmanney at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 4:54 PM, William Flynn Wallace <
>> foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Who has more social mobility than pretty/beautiful women?  So it makes
>>> sense that the men that get them are more wealthy, powerful, hence more
>>> intelligent.
>>>
>>> And so their children tend, at least. towards being better looking and
>>> more intelligent.
>>>
>>
>> When it comes to intelligence, it's the mother's genes that count in
>> boys. They've only got one X chromosome which expresses intelligence.
>> That's why you sometimes see the sons of the wealthy and powerful are as
>> dumb as a sack of hammers, if dear old dad only married for beauty.
>>
>> PJ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20151002/6519b285/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list