[ExI] [Bulk] Re: IQ and beauty

BillK pharos at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 09:44:27 UTC 2015


On 5 October 2015 at 02:56, spike wrote:
>
<snip>
> It has been argued that peacocks have more brilliant colors if they are free
> of parasites, so peahens selecting the most brilliantly colored males are
> selecting for the healthiest mates.  If we really want to stretch, we could
> argue that the peacock would be impossible for a serpent to swallow, being
> too long.  Or that the huge tail would discourage some predators, who could
> be intimidated by its size.
>
> Still I agree that as the tails become too unwieldly, this is more likely an
> example of mate selection to extinction.
>


Evolution tries everything.

<http://nautil.us/blog/what-to-do-when-your-girlfriend-is-70-times-bigger-than-you>

Quote:
Most animals require close contact to reproduce, using either internal
fertilization (as humans do) or fertilization nearby (think spawning
salmon). So having a similarly matched body size is helpful for
reasons of physical logistics—as well as for personal safety (as we’ll
soon see). But for causes still obscure to most—except Evolution
herself—in a very few, very distantly related animals, males and
females long ago diverged to two radically different scales.
-------------------


BillK




More information about the extropy-chat mailing list