[ExI] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Cramer on impossibility of FTL communication

[scerir at alice.it]

atymes at gmail.com wrote:In general you seem to be postulating, "If we are uncertain about which of two things did something or is something, then they must be interacting with each other at any future point where some external observer finally clears up that uncertainty."  That conclusion does not follow from that premise.
 # I'm not postulating anything, There is a principle. It is called the principle of "indistinguishability". No external observer clears up uncertainties at any future point. I did not  write that. Cabrillo, Zeilinger, Elitzur, Dolev, Cirac, etc. did not write that in those papers. Thanks. s.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150904/fcc34956/attachment.html>