[ExI] Meta question
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 16:32:04 UTC 2016
Given that, we cannot define irrational behavior. spike
Weight in on this Anders - please?
I think if one cannot define a word one should not use it. On Match.com,
which I was on a few years ago, I had to pick: Religious, Spiritual but
not Religious, neither Spiritual nor Religious. I picked the second one
but cannot to this day say what Spiritual means. I just did not want to
severely limit my matches. But I do not use words that if I were asked I
could not define to my satisfaction. So, for ex., I do not use these
words: intuition, instinct, spiritual.
(as for your engineers, I would think that 'whatever works' is rational and
whatever doesn't, despite theory, first impression, or expert opinion to
the contrary, is irrational)
bill w
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> This discussion reminds me of Caplan's concept of rational irrationality:
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_irrationality
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
> Sample my Kindle books via:
> http://author.to/DanUst
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160818/63af6bba/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list