[ExI] new ninth?
danust2012 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 16:47:51 UTC 2016
On Jan 25, 2016, at 8:13 AM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Anders Sandberg <anders at aleph.se> wrote:
>> > Would it actually count as a planet? I seem to recall that the Pluto-killing definition includes "has cleared its orbit of planetesimals".
> I've never quite understood that definition. Neptune hasn't cleared its orbit of Pluto so why is Neptune a planet?
This one I agree with you on. And let's say by some change another currently accepted planet's orbit became uncleared -- say the asteroid belt shifted into Mars orbit -- would it be scratched from the list of planets?
And how clear is clear? There are Mars-crossing asteroids now, to stick with my example.
I don't see why the decision couldn't have been along the lines of:
There are three types of planets we now know of:
1. Rocky ones like Earth and Mars,
2. Gassy ones like Jupiter and Neptun, and
3. Icy ones like Pluto.
I don't see why 1 plus 2 alone must be planets, must be where Nature made the joints, while 3 is not.
Sample my Kindle books via:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat