[ExI] 107 Nobel laureates tell Greenpeace to stop opposing GMOs
protokol2020 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 2 06:55:24 UTC 2016
A dual loyalty, to people on one hand and to an entity frequently hostile
to people like the Mother Nature on the other - cannot work anyway. Sooner
or later one has to decide between the two.
Or at least, which one has an absolute priority. Worshiping Environment is
quite a silly paganism by my book.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Rafal Smigrodzki <rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> I hope you mean extreme environmentalists. Surely you are not in favor
>> of pollution, etc.
> ### Well, I am a transhumanist, a subspecies of humanist, and therefore I
> do oppose all environmentalists (sorry, nothing personal). I am in favor of
> pollution, whenever it suits human interests. It's OK to discharge poisons
> into the air, water and earth, as long as the net effect on (trans)humanity
> is beneficial. We breathe, pee, generate solid waste and in other ways
> damage our environment but it is right and proper to do so, provided we
> mind the interests of other humans. But it is wrong to make peremptory
> demands on other humans under the pretext of protecting the reified
> "Environment", an inhuman moral subject of its own.
> Those who are alive have to deal with some shit. It's only necessary make
> sure it does not fall on other humans, nothing less, nothing more.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat