[ExI] 107 Nobel laureates tell Greenpeace to stop opposing GMOs

[Tomaz Kristan]

A dual loyalty, to people on one hand and to an entity  frequently hostile
to people like the Mother Nature on the other - cannot work anyway. Sooner
or later one has to decide between the two.

 Or at least, which one has an absolute priority. Worshiping Environment is
quite a silly paganism by my book.

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Rafal Smigrodzki <rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I hope you mean extreme environmentalists.  Surely you are not in favor
>> of pollution, etc.
>>
>
> ### Well, I am a transhumanist, a subspecies of humanist, and therefore I
> do oppose all environmentalists (sorry, nothing personal). I am in favor of
> pollution, whenever it suits human interests. It's OK to discharge poisons
> into the air, water and earth, as long as the net effect on (trans)humanity
> is beneficial. We breathe, pee, generate solid waste and in other ways
> damage our environment but it is right and proper to do so, provided we
> mind the interests of other humans. But it is wrong to make peremptory
> demands on other humans under the pretext of protecting the reified
> "Environment", an inhuman moral subject of its own.
>
> Those who are alive have to deal with some shit. It's only necessary make
> sure it does not fall on other humans, nothing less, nothing more.
>
> Rafał
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>


-- 
https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160702/55e724c4/attachment.html>