[ExI] for math neurologists - anders etc.

[Anders]

The original paper can be found at
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/07/19/0956797616654912.abstract

Pretty nifty. Of course, the task was largely set up so they roughly 
knew that some discrete steps were going to happen, but the statistical 
method seems pretty clever in teasing out what those steps look like and 
how many are necessary to describe the process. The main result is not 
so much the math processing (looks roughly like what I would have 
guessed) but the fact that one can segment it.


On 2016-07-30 18:46, William Flynn Wallace wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/29/science/brain-scans-math.html?utm_source=pocket&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pockethits&_r=0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat

-- 
Dr Anders Sandberg
Future of Humanity Institute
Oxford Martin School
Oxford University

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160730/0d65d80d/attachment.html>