[ExI] privacy again

Tara Maya tara at taramayastales.com
Wed Mar 2 20:13:19 UTC 2016


The person who took the video should be found and sent to prison, not merely sued. But the amount of money involved is not based on “hotness” …it’s based on what would be a deterrent. A lot of money can be made from such videos, and it that means that if the punishment isn’t severe, nothing will be done to stop it.

A nude video being taken is a huge violation. It’s a form of sexual assault. It’s not some funny little prank. 

Tara Maya


> On Mar 2, 2016, at 9:34 AM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:
> 
>  
>  
> There is a big case in the US courts about a newscaster who had a nude video taken of her by a stalker who removed the peephole in the door.  The video made it to the internet.  She claims damages against the hotel chain, not against the guy who took the video.
>  
> This whole thing brings up a number of questions.  
>  
> Why does she think her exposed nudity is really worth 75 million bucks?
>  
> What if she had been an ordinary person like you and me: is our nudity worth 75 million, or does it need to be scaled somehow?
>  
>                 How?  
>                 Is there some kind of universal hotness scale?
>                 Do hotties get more if they are recorded nude than coldies or tepidies?
>                 How much more?
>                 Can a person be so bone-deep ugly that such a video is worth zero point nada?
>                 Is the payout proportional to the number of internet hits?
>                 Why?
>  
> As we brought up a decade ago: it would be eeeeeasy easy to hide a video device in a hotel room, almost completely without risk.  It could be set up to receive a call and turn on at any time, and Skype the video to any remote receiver, with very little risk of getting caught and not much cost really.  So are we now saying the hotel chain is responsible for find that?  In the meantime, are we cool with it that all assured privacy in any public place, any public restroom and any hotel room is 
> now gone?  Could we not argue that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy there?
>  
> spike
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat <http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat>
Tara Maya
Blog <http://taramayastales.blogspot.com/>  |  Twitter <https://twitter.com/taramayastales>  |  Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Unfinished-Song-Epic-Fantasy/310271375658211?ref=hl>  |  Amazon <http://www.amazon.com/Tara-Maya/e/B004HAI038/ref=sr_tc_2_0?qid=1349796143&sr=8-2-ent>  |  Goodreads <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2951879.Tara_Maya>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160302/8d438b77/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list