[ExI] Demonstration of Bell's Inequality

[Adrian Tymes]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Stuart LaForge <avant at sollegro.com> wrote:
> But this trick does not work with entangled quantum particles. It would be
> as if your coins were changing identity between Step 1 and Step 2.
>
> Is your mind blown yet?

Not really.  If the particles change identity between observations,
then that is what they do.

> Here is a simple math explanation of Bell's Inequality:
>
> http://www.mtnmath.com/whatth/node60.html

If that's what you're analogizing to, your analogy fails.  Spins of 0
and 90 degrees may differ, but both may be detected at 45 degrees off.
Further, the paper's assertion about local hidden variables does not
seem to hold - in other words, it appears to be disproving a strawman.
This unfortunately seems to happen a lot in quantum mechanics papers.