[ExI] probably extremely simple physics problem

[William Flynn Wallace]

Maybe the Dutch are good at discovering things but not so good at following
them up.  Look at Antonie van Leeuwenhoek - first man to see bacteria etc.
and yet it took hundreds of years before anybody made studies of them.  The
germ theory of disease was fought tooth and nail and talon well into the
late 19th century.

I seem to recall some notable physicist in the 1800s saying that
heavier-than-air flight was impossible.

BTY - I remember Connections and its sequel (???) very well and loved them,
but for a history of science that is that interesting I dunno any others.
Do you?

Anybody?  Connections was not like a complete textbook and probably would
be dull if it were.

bill w

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] *On
> Behalf Of *William Flynn Wallace
> *Sent:* Monday, August 07, 2017 9:39 AM
> *To:* ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> *Subject:* [ExI] probably extremely simple physics problem
>
>
>
> Recall those Dutch windmills:  huge area on the sails.  Look at the
> current enormous wind machines for making electricity: so skinny.
>
>
>
> It would seem to a simpleton like me, that the more area you had, the more
> wind you caught - but apparently not - or something.
>
>
>
> What gives here?
>
>
>
> bill w
>
>
>
>
>
> The optimal solution was enabled by advanced material technology.  Billw,
> the critical number is not the area of the blades but rather the swept
> area.  Part of the reason is that having a wide chord, like the Dutch
> windmills, makes higher wind resistance, so they can’t turn as fast.  The
> modern skinny blade windmills really get kiting around there, much more
> efficient for swatting birds into the next county.
>
>
>
> Note a sail plane, where gliding efficiency is everything: the wingspan is
> long and the chord is short: very efficient for glide ratio.  The fighter
> plane has short wingspan, long chord: inefficient glide ratio, better for
> high performance in what fighter planes do.  Cargo planes have the wider
> chord for increased lift capability, where speed isn’t critical.  Different
> missions.
>
>
>
> The Dutch were using wind power to lift water, whereas the Yanks are using
> it to generate power: different missions.
>
>
>
> Now that you mention it however, please offer your take on something that
> has long puzzled me: why didn’t the Dutch get to powered flight first?
> They had way more understanding of aerodynamics than anyone because of
> their experience with the windmills.  They were early adopters of the
> German Nickolaus Otto’s marvelous internal combustion engine.  They had
> plenty of flat ground on which to build runways.  They were well along in
> the industrial revolution, factories and such.  They had worked out the
> notion of rigid cantilevered structures such the windmill blades.  I am
> amazed the yanks would get powered flight off the ground first, with the
> French in close pursuit.  I would have thought the Dutch would be the first
> to fly, followed by the Germans with the Yanks third and the French well
> back there.
>
>
>
> spike
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20170807/14df3461/attachment.html>