[ExI] Discovery Suggests All Complex Life Came From
Ben
bbenzai at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 19 10:46:05 UTC 2017
Me:
> ... not convinced that all life on earth had to originate from a
single cell, but from a /population/ of similar cells.
... Does anyone have a convincing counter-argument?
BillK:
> Yes. Every earth species uses the same DNA proteins. Multiple
origins are far more unlikely than everything coming from one origin.
John Clark:
> The evidence strongly indicates that everything alive today is
descended from just one organism, LUCA (the Last Universal Common
Ancestor) that lived between 3.5 and 3.8 billion years ago. But that
doesn't mean that LUCA was the first living thing, in fact it almost
certainly was not; it's just that lines of descent other than LUCA's
ended up going extinct. Perhaps LUCA had some beneficial mutation, or
more likely LUCA just got lucky.
I'm not arguing against LUCA, not at all, and I agree with what BillK
and John Clark say.
Instead, I'm arguing against the idea that LUCA had to be a /single
individual cell/. I'm saying that it could well have been a single
/type/ of cell, with more than one individual. And that this seems more
likely.
It's not beyond the bounds of possibility that a set of
randomly-generated protocells had the same set of molecules for storing
information, and the differences between them were negligible. This pool
of protocells would be LUCA.
If you have a set of circumstances that generate a variety of
mechanisms, how likely is it that there will only be one single instance
of any one mechanism? It's impossible to say, I know, without knowing
how big the environment is that produces those circumstances, and what
the circumstances actually are. How many protocells existed, 3.8 bn
years ago? We have no idea. It may have been half-a-dozen, or it might
have been trillions. I'd imagine that a few billion might be a
reasonable guess, though.
As an analogy, suppose there are half a million valid english words, and
a single one of them represents LUCA. If you randomly generate, say, 2
million valid english words, what's the probability that the LUCA word
will only crop up once?
Without knowing just how many protocells were being generated, and the
exact constraints of the chemistry, we'll probably never know the
answer, I'm just saying it doesn't /have to be/ a single, solitary cell,
and it seems unlikely that it would have been.
Ben Zaiboc
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list