[ExI] Gravity wave math

[Tomaz Kristan]

I am sceptical. The first "strong observation" was on time for the 100th
anniversary, but we don't have the second one yet.

Just as we have 1 (one) "strong observation" for the Higgs.

I am not saying, that gravitational waves don't exist, or that Higgs' boson
doesn't exist.

But on the base of those observations, I can't claim that they do exist.
Those scientists have apparently no such problems. Their faith is strong
enough.

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 3:23 PM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: extropy-chat [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Keith Henson
> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 9:06 PM
> To: ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> Subject: [ExI] Gravity wave math
>
> If you want someone serious to chew on:
>
> http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/2016-53-04/S0273-0979-2016-01544-8/
>
> "The emergence of gravitational wave science: 100 years of development of
> mathematical theory, detectors, numerical algorithms, and data analysis
> tools"
>
> Thanks Keith!  I wasn't aware that Hilbert was right there doing that work.
> It is easy to imagine Einstein sailing uncharted waters alone with General
> Relativity, but there were others working that.
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>



-- 
https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20170528/5c22efe8/attachment.html>