[ExI] Gravity wave math
protokol2020 at gmail.com
Sun May 28 14:31:37 UTC 2017
I am sceptical. The first "strong observation" was on time for the 100th
anniversary, but we don't have the second one yet.
Just as we have 1 (one) "strong observation" for the Higgs.
I am not saying, that gravitational waves don't exist, or that Higgs' boson
But on the base of those observations, I can't claim that they do exist.
Those scientists have apparently no such problems. Their faith is strong
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 3:23 PM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: extropy-chat [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] On
> Of Keith Henson
> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 9:06 PM
> To: ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> Subject: [ExI] Gravity wave math
> If you want someone serious to chew on:
> "The emergence of gravitational wave science: 100 years of development of
> mathematical theory, detectors, numerical algorithms, and data analysis
> Thanks Keith! I wasn't aware that Hilbert was right there doing that work.
> It is easy to imagine Einstein sailing uncharted waters alone with General
> Relativity, but there were others working that.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat