[ExI] contra Kahneman
atymes at gmail.com
Fri Dec 28 21:34:52 UTC 2018
> It's long but it's worth it.
This is almost never true these days. Summary: it turns out that
humans are much better at finding "obvious" stuff than thought - when
they aren't trying to focus on one thing (thus excluding other stuff)
and keeping in mind how much "obvious" stuff there generally is.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:39 AM William Flynn Wallace
<foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's long but it's worth it. My question is: how can such a paper be written without the use of the concept of attention? Focus? I agree - what's out there is driven by what we expect to see. Without any ideas anything might be seen or not seen. Reinterpretaion of the invisible gorilla. bill w
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
More information about the extropy-chat