[ExI] musk's ride
interzone at gmail.com
Wed Jan 3 19:26:28 UTC 2018
Not being a rocket scientist, I guess that makes sense in general, but to
John's point, it doesn't seem like a great idea when you are increasing
complexity in a system that is somewhat prone to blowing up.
In any case, I wish them a lot of success with the launch and am excited
about the prospect of a rocket with that much power coming back into the
space exploration toolkit.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Dave Sill <sparge at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Dylan Distasio <interzone at gmail.com>
>> I'm curious, does anyone here know why they took the approach of many
>> smaller engines versus much fewer larger ones?
> That is my guess too.
> Sample my latest Kindle book "Sand Trap":
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat