[ExI] musk's ride

Dylan Distasio interzone at gmail.com
Wed Jan 3 19:26:28 UTC 2018

Not being a rocket scientist, I guess that makes sense in general, but to
John's point, it doesn't seem like a great idea when you are increasing
complexity in a system that is somewhat prone to blowing up.

In any case, I wish them a lot of success with the launch and am excited
about the prospect of a rocket with that much power coming back into the
space exploration toolkit.

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Dave Sill <sparge at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Dylan Distasio <interzone at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I'm curious, does anyone here know why they took the approach of many
>> smaller engines versus much fewer larger ones?
> Scalability?
> That is my guess too.
> Regards,
> Dan
>    Sample my latest Kindle book "Sand Trap":
> http://mybook.to/SandTrap
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20180103/c808b52f/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list