[ExI] Neural networks score higher than humans in reading and comprehension test

Dave Sill sparge at gmail.com
Tue Jan 16 18:21:11 UTC 2018

*However, challenging the “comprehension” description, Gary Marcus, PhD, a
Professor of Psychology and Neural Science at NYU, notes in a tweet that
“the SQUAD test shows that machines can highlight relevant passages in
text, not that they understand those passages.”*



On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 1:13 PM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:

> Microsoft achieved 82,650 on the Stanford University reading and
> comprehension test, the best human score so far is 82,304.
> http://www.kurzweilai.net/deep-neural-network-models-
> score-higher-than-humans-in-reading-and-comprehension-
> test?utm_source=KurzweilAI+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=
> c8f5d1257b-UA-946742-1&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6de721fb33-c8f5d1257b-
> 282205341
> John K Clark
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20180116/bafdcaad/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list