[ExI] young people having less sex

[William Flynn Wallace]

So we can assume that what you report is both wonderful and disastrous news
for the spy business.  How can one know that the embassy is safe from
spying?  Can't, it seems.  bill w

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 1:04 PM <spike at rainier66.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> *On Behalf
> Of *William Flynn Wallace
> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] young people having less sex
>
>
>
> >>…Then we know for a fact that all assured privacy is gone.
>
> >>…Will you carry yourself any differently?
>
> >>…spike
>
>
>
>
>
> >…Probably not.  But in novels they have bug detectors to sweep the
> room.  None for this kind of bug?  bill w
>
>
>
> The bug detectors look for electromagnetic transmission.  Modern spy cams
> need not do that.  They carry sufficient memory to be completely
> self-contained, collecting and storing images for physical retrieval or for
> burst transmission that would look exactly like a television emissions in
> the EM band.  I would argue this would make them nearly undetectable.
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:38 AM <spike at rainier66.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> *On Behalf
> Of *Donald Trump
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 18, 2018 10:06 AM
> *To:* extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] young people having less sex
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >…With a sex robot I would worry about who is looking at me through her
> eyes?
>
>
>
> The Donald
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We now know that self-contained battery powered cameras can be and have
> been hidden in hotel rooms.  The cameras themselves are so tiny: notice the
> size of the aperture on your cell phone camera.  The device itself is
> smaller than a pea.  Taking an old cell phone apart is very educational.
>
>
>
> Current spy tech can be defeated by turning off the lights when you go
> into a hotel room (those tiny aperture cameras don’t work well in low
> light) but they can have their own IR source.  IR sources can be seen.  So
> what if… they keep going and make those spy cams work in near UV?  Then the
> aperture can be made even smaller, they could have their own light source
> which can’t be seen and the video they record would be in even higher
> resolution.  Then we know for a fact that all assured privacy is gone.
>
>
>
> Will you carry yourself any differently?
>
>
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20181119/13661c02/attachment.html>