From sparge at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 00:36:26 2019 From: sparge at gmail.com (Dave Sill) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:36:26 -0400 Subject: [ExI] fermi question alive and well In-Reply-To: <017f01d4e7e2$4dacc360$e9064a20$@rainier66.com> References: <017f01d4e7e2$4dacc360$e9064a20$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 1:03 PM wrote: > > In light of more recent developments, I encourage periodic re-evaluation > of all tradition and protocol, in all areas of our lives, including > religion, politics, internet, everything. > Speaking of the Internet...how many of today's under 40's techies know why it's called that? How many can give even the crudest explanation of an IMP? Hint: it's not a portmanteau of "international" and "network". -Dave > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Mon Apr 1 02:12:59 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 19:12:59 -0700 Subject: [ExI] fermi question alive and well In-Reply-To: References: <017f01d4e7e2$4dacc360$e9064a20$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <001a01d4e830$6e578250$4b0686f0$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Dave Sill Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 5:36 PM To: ExI chat list Subject: Re: [ExI] fermi question alive and well On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 1:03 PM > wrote: In light of more recent developments, I encourage periodic re-evaluation of all tradition and protocol, in all areas of our lives, including religion, politics, internet, everything. Speaking of the Internet...how many of today's under 40's techies know why it's called that? How many can give even the crudest explanation of an IMP? Hint: it's not a portmanteau of "international" and "network". -Dave Hi Dave, cool thanks. I don?t know what is an IMP, and am well over 40. In any case another though occurred to me, so I don?t have to worry about the dreaded double post, what a relief, even if I no longer remember why it was ever dreaded: traditions stick for whatever reason, for long after everyone who remembers why they started has perished. We see this in church liturgy: only a few hardcore experts in that one narrow field know why church services go off the way they do and how it started, and why plenty of it probably doesn?t really apply anymore but people still do it because people still do it because people still do it that way and so on. In that world tradition is tolerated because it is so tolerated. If everyone forgets to move on, well no problem. In the internet world, things change very quickly. But there are a few relics that just stay on, in a way a bit analogous to tradition in the church world. People forget to change. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hkeithhenson at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 02:41:58 2019 From: hkeithhenson at gmail.com (Keith Henson) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 19:41:58 -0700 Subject: [ExI] fermi question alive and well Message-ID: I posted this last June. https://www.rt.com/news/430736-aliens-search-fermi-paradox/ Anders Sandberg and Eric Drexler make a strong case that what we see is what we should expect. Keith From johnkclark at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 12:28:40 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:28:40 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Supermassive Black Holes Message-ID: The Event Horizon Telescope is a array of radio telescopes on 4 continents that forms a virtual telescope with the resolution one telescope as large as the entire Earth. It was put together for the sole purpose of getting a picture of the supermassive Black Hole at the center of our galaxy, they've been working on this since 2006. On April 10 2019 at 9am EST they will have a press conference and announce what they found. All they will say now is that the results will be "groundbreaking". The event will be live streamed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=Dr20f19czeE John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sparge at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 13:12:54 2019 From: sparge at gmail.com (Dave Sill) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:12:54 -0400 Subject: [ExI] fermi question alive and well In-Reply-To: <001a01d4e830$6e578250$4b0686f0$@rainier66.com> References: <017f01d4e7e2$4dacc360$e9064a20$@rainier66.com> <001a01d4e830$6e578250$4b0686f0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:18 PM wrote: > Hi Dave, cool thanks. I don?t know what is an IMP, and am well over 40. > >From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_Message_Processor "The Interface Message Processor (IMP) was the packet switching node used to interconnect participant networks to the ARPANET from the late 1960s to 1989. It was the first generation of gateways, which are known today as routers.[1][2][3] An IMP was a ruggedized Honeywell DDP-516 minicomputer with special-purpose interfaces and software.[4] In later years the IMPs were made from the non-ruggedized Honeywell 316 which could handle two-thirds of the communication traffic at approximately one-half the cost.[5] An IMP requires the connection to a host computer via a special bit-serial interface, defined in BBN Report 1822. The IMP software and the ARPA network communications protocol running on the IMPs was discussed in RFC 1, the first of a series of standardization documents published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)." In the early days of networking, networks were proprietary: Sperry systems talked to other Sperry systems and IBM systems talked to other IBM systems. IMPs enabled networking different physical networks together: internetworking. It was internetworking that caused physical networking to explode because it made it vastly more useful. It's great that you can move files from server A to server B at your workplace without physically transferring a disk or tape but it's absolutely game-changing that you can send files around the world quickly and inexpensively. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 17:12:23 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:12:23 -0400 Subject: [ExI] =?utf-8?b?4oCLQXMgb2YgdG9kYXkg4oCLTElHTyBhbmQgVmlyZ2/igIsg?= =?utf-8?q?are_back_online=E2=80=8B?= Message-ID: LIGO and Virgo gravitational wave detectors are back online John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pharos at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 15:23:37 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:23:37 +0100 Subject: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April Message-ID: National Robotics Week, April 6-14 2019 Obviously - quite a lot of events near San Francisco. :) BillK From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 2 15:50:56 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:50:56 -0700 Subject: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <005101d4e96b$dcc27150$964753f0$@rainier66.com> -----Original Message----- From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of BillK Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 8:24 AM To: Extropy Chat Subject: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April National Robotics Week, April 6-14 2019 Obviously - quite a lot of events near San Francisco. :) BillK _______________________________________________ One of our scouts competed in the big regional robotics contests at San Jose State U last weekend. Oh man that show is a hoot: they get these student-built robots to load boxes, drop basketballs in bins, do all this crazy stuff, hoist themselves off the floor after they finish the task for extra points. This is waaaay more fun to watch than a football game. I look forward to it every year. spike From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 2 16:03:32 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:03:32 -0700 Subject: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April In-Reply-To: <005101d4e96b$dcc27150$964753f0$@rainier66.com> References: <005101d4e96b$dcc27150$964753f0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <005301d4e96d$9f7d8ee0$de78aca0$@rainier66.com> -----Original Message----- From: spike at rainier66.com >...> Subject: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April National Robotics Week, April 6-14 2019 BillK _______________________________________________ >...One of our scouts competed in the big regional robotics contests at San Jose State U last weekend. Oh man that show is a hoot: they get these student-built robots to... I look forward to it every year. spike This competition is always great fun, but I can see ways to make it better. For instance... These robots are remote control, for perfectly understandable reasons: students are on a limited budget and limited schedule. But we could imagine leagues in this sport beyond college, where you have the more hardcore hobbyist, with bigger budgets, years to invest, contacts to get corporate sponsorships and all that, and make them fully autonomous. We know companies are developing stuff like that, but wouldn't it be cool to have amateur clubs competing against each other and maybe scare the big dogs? Or inspire the big dogs? spike From hibbard at wisc.edu Tue Apr 2 19:50:10 2019 From: hibbard at wisc.edu (Bill Hibbard) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:50:10 +0000 Subject: [ExI] NY Times: brain enhancement and life extension Message-ID: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/health/klotho-brain-enhancement-dementia-alzheimers.html From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 2 20:29:01 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 13:29:01 -0700 Subject: [ExI] NY Times: brain enhancement and life extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <001a01d4e992$b58498d0$208dca70$@rainier66.com> -----Original Message----- From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Bill Hibbard Subject: [ExI] NY Times: brain enhancement and life extension https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/health/klotho-brain-enhancement-dementia- alzheimers.html _______________________________________________ Thanks Bill. I am amused by ethicists who struggle with these kinds of questions. Reasoning: if a cure for Alzheimers is discovered, of course that is ethical to use, and unethical to refuse it, or fail to use it if available. Now we make the very reasonable extrapolation and ask what if it enhances everyone's brain? The ethicists fret and stew over whether it is ethical for people who are already smart and rich to use it. I tell them, don't worry for a minute: you can't stop them. No society has been able to stop drug abuse for recreational purposes. We couldn't do anything analogous to blood tests top athletes must take: you can't make students do those. So don't worry, there is no stopping it: everyone who access to any brain enhancement medication will use it. spike From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 2 20:45:15 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 13:45:15 -0700 Subject: [ExI] natasha is civilized Message-ID: <004301d4e994$fa69b410$ef3d1c30$@rainier66.com> I felt so important yesterday. My bride was playing a new version of Civilization. She was doing so well she achieved nanotechnology. A quote came up, she said HEY, check this: "If technology is the engine of change, then nanotechnology is the fuel for humanity's future." - Natasha Vita-More There was our own Natasha, at the pinnacle of Civilization. Natasha if you are reading, thanks for this. It made my day. spike From pharos at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 21:47:35 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 22:47:35 +0100 Subject: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April In-Reply-To: <005301d4e96d$9f7d8ee0$de78aca0$@rainier66.com> References: <005101d4e96b$dcc27150$964753f0$@rainier66.com> <005301d4e96d$9f7d8ee0$de78aca0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 17:19, wrote: > > > This competition is always great fun, but I can see ways to make it better. > For instance... These robots are remote control, for perfectly > understandable reasons: students are on a limited budget and limited > schedule. But we could imagine leagues in this sport beyond college, where > you have the more hardcore hobbyist, with bigger budgets, years to invest, > contacts to get corporate sponsorships and all that, and make them fully > autonomous. We know companies are developing stuff like that, but wouldn't > it be cool to have amateur clubs competing against each other and maybe > scare the big dogs? Or inspire the big dogs? > Latest Boston Dynamics warehouse pallet stacking robot - Nice mover! :) Quote: Boston Dynamics Published on Mar 28, 2019 Handle is a mobile manipulation robot designed for logistics. Handle autonomously performs mixed SKU pallet building and depalletizing after initialization and localizing against the pallets. The on-board vision system on Handle tracks the marked pallets for navigation and finds individual boxes for grasping and placing. When Handle places a boxes onto a pallet, it uses force control to nestle each box up against its neighbors. The boxes used in the video weigh about 5 Kg (11 lbs), but the robot is designed to handle boxes up to (15 Kg) (33 lb). This version of Handle works with pallets that are 1.2 m deep and 1.7 m tall (48 inches deep and 68 inches tall). ------------------- BillK From mlatorra at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 23:10:12 2019 From: mlatorra at gmail.com (Michael LaTorra) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:10:12 -0400 Subject: [ExI] natasha is civilized In-Reply-To: <004301d4e994$fa69b410$ef3d1c30$@rainier66.com> References: <004301d4e994$fa69b410$ef3d1c30$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: That's terrific! Natasha Vita-More is one of the great stalwarts of the movement for more and better life. I hope that she writes a memoir someday. Although I had spoken with her many times at various conferences, I had no idea of her early life pre-ExI and pre-Upwingers until a few years ago. She has a very interesting biography. Mike LaTorra On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:51 PM wrote: > > I felt so important yesterday. My bride was playing a new version of > Civilization. She was doing so well she achieved nanotechnology. A quote > came up, she said HEY, check this: > > "If technology is the engine of change, then nanotechnology is the fuel for > humanity's future." > > - Natasha Vita-More > > There was our own Natasha, at the pinnacle of Civilization. > > Natasha if you are reading, thanks for this. It made my day. > > spike > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 2 23:11:43 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:11:43 -0700 Subject: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April In-Reply-To: References: <005101d4e96b$dcc27150$964753f0$@rainier66.com> <005301d4e96d$9f7d8ee0$de78aca0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <001001d4e9a9$721dd6d0$56598470$@rainier66.com> -----Original Message----- From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of BillK Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:48 PM To: ExI chat list Subject: Re: [ExI] USA Robotics Week 6-14 April On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 17:19, wrote: > > > This competition is always great fun, but I can see ways to make it better. .... > Latest Boston Dynamics warehouse pallet stacking robot - Nice mover! :) Quote: Boston Dynamics Published on Mar 28, 2019 Handle is a mobile manipulation robot designed for logistics. Handle autonomously performs mixed SKU pallet building and depalletizing after initialization ... ------------------- BillK _______________________________________________ Cool thanks BillK! It is difficult for me to watch this video without immediately envisioning the obvious: racing these two guys against each other. I don't mean racing them around a track... heeeeeyyyy, that's an idea! Well, OK that too, but we could have races to see who could build the highest stack of boxes in the least time, that kinda stuff. But about the other, we could race a coupla these sonsa bitches around a roller derby track, or several of them for that matter, and make it fair game to bump the others or to hurl the other bastard off the track and stuff like that. I would buy a ticket to see it. spike From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 2 23:13:40 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:13:40 -0700 Subject: [ExI] natasha is civilized In-Reply-To: References: <004301d4e994$fa69b410$ef3d1c30$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <001201d4e9a9$b5de5a20$219b0e60$@rainier66.com> From: Michael LaTorra Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:10 PM To: ExI chat list Cc: spike at rainier66.com Subject: Re: [ExI] natasha is civilized That's terrific! Natasha Vita-More is one of the great stalwarts of the movement for more and better life. I hope that she writes a memoir someday. Although I had spoken with her many times at various conferences, I had no idea of her early life pre-ExI and pre-Upwingers until a few years ago. She has a very interesting biography. Mike LaTorra Michael don?t give up on that. I know a little of Natasha?s pre-us life, and ja it is way cool. I might contact her again with my offer: all she hasta do is record it, I will type it, give her the finished product. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mlatorra at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 23:18:07 2019 From: mlatorra at gmail.com (Michael LaTorra) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:18:07 -0400 Subject: [ExI] natasha is civilized In-Reply-To: <001201d4e9a9$b5de5a20$219b0e60$@rainier66.com> References: <004301d4e994$fa69b410$ef3d1c30$@rainier66.com> <001201d4e9a9$b5de5a20$219b0e60$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Spike, I hope she takes you up on it. Sometimes a little good-natured nagging can produce salutary results. So do contact her again! Mike On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:13 PM wrote: > > > *From:* Michael LaTorra > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:10 PM > *To:* ExI chat list > *Cc:* spike at rainier66.com > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] natasha is civilized > > > > That's terrific! Natasha Vita-More is one of the great stalwarts of the > movement for more and better life. > > > > I hope that she writes a memoir someday. Although I had spoken with her > many times at various conferences, I had no idea of her early life pre-ExI > and pre-Upwingers until a few years ago. She has a very interesting > biography. > > > > Mike LaTorra > > > > > > > > Michael don?t give up on that. I know a little of Natasha?s pre-us life, > and ja it is way cool. I might contact her again with my offer: all she > hasta do is record it, I will type it, give her the finished product. > > > > spike > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pharos at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 23:47:52 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:47:52 +0100 Subject: [ExI] natasha is civilized In-Reply-To: <001201d4e9a9$b5de5a20$219b0e60$@rainier66.com> References: <004301d4e994$fa69b410$ef3d1c30$@rainier66.com> <001201d4e9a9$b5de5a20$219b0e60$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 00:41, wrote: > > From: Michael LaTorra > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:10 PM > To: ExI chat list > Cc: spike at rainier66.com > Subject: Re: [ExI] natasha is civilized > > > That's terrific! Natasha Vita-More is one of the great stalwarts of the movement for more and better life. > > I hope that she writes a memoir someday. Although I had spoken with her many times at various conferences, I had no idea of her early life pre-ExI and pre-Upwingers until a few years ago. She has a very interesting biography. > > Mike LaTorra > > > Michael don?t give up on that. I know a little of Natasha?s pre-us life, and ja it is way cool. I might contact her again with my offer: all she hasta do is record it, I will type it, give her the finished product. > > spike > ??? Type???? I thought speech to text software was working OK nowadays. BillK From foozler83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 00:47:43 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:47:43 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna Message-ID: What's the best way to save your DNA for your children? They will have far more tests and sophisticated tests than now, and so I want to have that information available to my offspring. Group? bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 5 01:10:38 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 18:10:38 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: [ExI] dna What's the best way to save your DNA for your children? They will have far more tests and sophisticated tests than now, and so I want to have that information available to my offspring. Group? bill w It?s really easy if you are male. Hey this sounds like a great idea for Alcor. You would need to collect the sample yourself of course, then they could preserve it in an easily retrievable form way into the future. All the infrastructure is already in place. Thinking deeper: it is easy for females too. Not as enjoyable perhaps. Having your DNA available for your descendants, that?s a grand notion, and noble as hell. Hmmm, let me try conjugating that with a different simile. That grand notion is as noble as the Crawley family was before Britain began to ask: Hey why the heck do these few families own everything in sight? BillW, well done, me lad. You just handed Alcor a way to make a buttload. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 01:49:47 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 18:49:47 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <8B82F8EF-1AAE-4FA9-9EF9-FF572D9F85A3@gmail.com> Kidding aside, won?t that give you only fragments with a bit of randomness thrown in? Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst > On Apr 4, 2019, at 6:10 PM, wrote: > > > > From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace > Subject: [ExI] dna > > What's the best way to save your DNA for your children? They will have far more tests and sophisticated tests than now, and so I want to have that information available to my offspring. > > Group? > > bill w > > > > It?s really easy if you are male. > > Hey this sounds like a great idea for Alcor. You would need to collect the sample yourself of course, then they could preserve it in an easily retrievable form way into the future. All the infrastructure is already in place. > > Thinking deeper: it is easy for females too. Not as enjoyable perhaps. > > Having your DNA available for your descendants, that?s a grand notion, and noble as hell. > > Hmmm, let me try conjugating that with a different simile. That grand notion is as noble as the Crawley family was before Britain began to ask: Hey why the heck do these few families own everything in sight? > > BillW, well done, me lad. You just handed Alcor a way to make a buttload. > > spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 5 02:15:19 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:15:19 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <8B82F8EF-1AAE-4FA9-9EF9-FF572D9F85A3@gmail.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <8B82F8EF-1AAE-4FA9-9EF9-FF572D9F85A3@gmail.com> Message-ID: <005701d4eb55$6b310830$41931890$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Dan TheBookMan Subject: Re: [ExI] dna Kidding aside, won?t that give you only fragments with a bit of randomness thrown in? Regards, Dan No, you can get the whole DNA sequence end to end with just that. I might be misunderstanding your question. Further thought: if stored that way, one could theoretically sire offspring hundreds of years into the future. Why anyone would want to is beyond me, but hey, we see how social mores and values drift. Right now our society seems to be losing our collective sense of humor, but that might turn around. In the future they might decide to breed for whatever it is I have a lot of, which could be determined by combing thru the archives. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pharos at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 10:20:29 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 11:20:29 +0100 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 01:54, William Flynn Wallace wrote: > > What's the best way to save your DNA for your children? They will have far more tests and sophisticated tests than now, and so I want to have that information available to my offspring. > The term you need to search is DNA Banking. This is a service already available. e.g. Used for preserving DNA from species going extinct. Some funeral homes offer this service. The quality of storage can vary depending on how long you want the sample to last. This company provides much information. Bear in mind that if the DNA sample might be needed in court proceedings then there will be legal requirements to prove that the DNA sample is actually yours and has not been contaminated or interfered with. BillK From johnkclark at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 12:15:28 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:15:28 -0400 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:16 PM wrote: > > >> >>What's the best way to save your DNA for your children? > > > It?s really easy if you are male. Hey this sounds like a great idea for > Alcor. > Each sperm would only contain half your genome, and another sperm picked at random is astronomically unlikely to contain the other half that's needed. A better way to preserve your DNA would be to just put your toothbrush in a plastic bag. A even better way would be to have Alcor freeze your entire brain with liquid nitrogen as that will preserve a lot more than just DNA. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 12:50:25 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:50:25 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: I will check out the service of DNA banking. But it can't be sperm. Why not? Vasectomy long ago. Had my three kids and hung it up, Dad-wise. bill w On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 7:20 AM John Clark wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:16 PM wrote: > >> >> >>> >>What's the best way to save your DNA for your children? >> >> > > > It?s really easy if you are male. Hey this sounds like a great idea for >> Alcor. >> > > Each sperm would only contain half your genome, and another sperm picked > at random is astronomically unlikely to contain the other half that's > needed. A better way to preserve your DNA would be to just put your > toothbrush in a plastic bag. A even better way would be to have Alcor > freeze your entire brain with liquid nitrogen as that will preserve a lot > more than just DNA. > > John K Clark > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 5 16:23:52 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:23:52 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of John Clark Subject: Re: [ExI] dna On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:16 PM > wrote: >>What's the best way to save your DNA for your children? >> It?s really easy if you are male. Hey this sounds like a great idea for Alcor. >?Each sperm would only contain half your genome, and another sperm picked at random is astronomically unlikely to contain the other half that's needed. A better way to preserve your DNA would be to just put your toothbrush in a plastic bag. A even better way would be to have Alcor freeze your entire brain with liquid nitrogen as that will preserve a lot more than just DNA. John K Clark Eh, there is that. But no worries, we can deal. Just collect the drool while the first sample is being produced, then preserve both. We could invent and market a device, a kind of facemask-like thing, designed specifically for collecting the latter (and another device for the former for that matter) and make money while we are at it. This whole thing has me thinking: I can see some really good justifications for preserving both the complete DNA and all that jizz. Reasoning: suppose someone lives to be 114 with no easily-identifiable secret to a long healthy life. Then suppose you find out from the internet archives that he was a hell of a good guy, smart, witty, imaginative and so on (hey now I all need to do is live to be 114 (oh wait, add modest to the list of virtues (I am the local champion of modesty.))) That guy would be highly regarded in the fertility clinic. Well hell, why not? I can see this happening. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 5 16:48:21 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:48:21 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> From: spike at rainier66.com >?This whole thing has me thinking: I can see some really good justifications for preserving both the complete DNA and all that jizz. Reasoning: suppose someone lives to be 114 with no easily-identifiable secret to a long healthy life?That guy would be highly regarded in the fertility clinic?spike Further thinking please (we modesty-champions are known for further thoughts?): If we go with the notion of having Alcor preserve the old kickapoo joy juice, then we might want to collect and preserve the sample earlier in life (reduced risk of heart attack or stroke for instance (and we know everything is still fully functional.)) If so, all that DNA contains a few carbon 14 atoms, about a part per trillion. Our carbon comes from our food and drink, ja? I don?t know the exact mechanism, but I would think the little swimmers are constantly being renewed and regenerated on a short cycle, so here?s an idea: devour special food and drink with the C14 removed for a month or two before one anticipates preserving one?s seed. Since the stuff might need to be preserved for a long time, a half a century or more, then you don?t want that stuff decaying and breaking up that good healthy DNA, ja? Of course, during the C14 purge period, one needs to be sure to get rid of the older C14-rich swimmers, offering a perfectly legitimate excuse (REASON rather, not excuse, reason) for one?s behavior. I have an idea how we could create C14-free food, for C14 is a lot easier to separate using centrifuges than is U235 (Reasoning: 14/12 > 238/235 by a lot.) So we create a sealable greenhouse made entirely of glass only and sealed with silicon bathtub caulk. Grow C14-free veggies in there by first flushing the volume with lab-grade nitrogen, then re-introducing some lab-grade oxygen and a bit of water vapor, then send in your specially-made C14 free CO2 so your veggies can breathe. A few months later: carbon-14 free veggies, which the rich guy buys from? well? me, at a scandalous profit of course, but he doesn?t care because he?s rich and? ehhh? distracted by the? procedure of preparing to preserve his non-radioactive progeny. Anyone want to join me? We can even come up with one of those cutesy business names so popular these days, such as: The Jizz Bizz? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From msd001 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 17:08:50 2019 From: msd001 at gmail.com (Mike Dougherty) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:08:50 -0400 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 12:53 PM wrote: > >?This whole thing has me thinking: I can see some really good > justifications for preserving both the complete DNA and all that > Preserving dna should be about converting it to data via sequencing, then using the usual method for preserving data in the short term (a few decades) or more exotic storage for longer. 200 gigabytes worth of data as bumps at election microscope scale wouldn't even cost much on a gold foil. We could laser etch some diamonds and your data could be a highly collectible jewelry. You could also send it into deep space as a pulse of radio information, but retrieving that data might be tricky. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 17:18:15 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:18:15 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: A whole buttload of money - again. How many schemes have you had? Some serious? Maybe this will work out for you - but not for my, jizz type thing, anyhow. Is drool better than hair? Nowadays your gut microbiome seems as important as genes. We can't pass that on (though Mama can when she delivers vaginally. I'll put up all of my savings, some $3.50 for your company. I'll take half the profits for the idea. Just thinking: long ago I saw my first four door truck. It was plain and belonged to some outfit that must have carried a crew. I thought: gee, I'd like to have one of those, only better looking. It took the car industry about 30 years to do just that, and there are now more trucks on the road than cars - or at least in sales - so they will eventually replace most cars, except for people like me who want a boat-like ride. (I have gotten laughs from people when I am towing a load of mulch behind my TownCar. "A Lincoln towing?)" Now why didn't I take that idea to the car companies? Never occurred to me. How do you protect yourself from others stealing your ideas? Walk into the car company's president'office and tell him the future. He'll say thanks and goodbye and you'll never make a penny out of it. bill w On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:53 AM wrote: > > > > > *From:* spike at rainier66.com > > > > >?This whole thing has me thinking: I can see some really good > justifications for preserving both the complete DNA and all that jizz. > Reasoning: suppose someone lives to be 114 with no easily-identifiable > secret to a long healthy life?That guy would be highly regarded in the > fertility clinic?spike > > > > > > Further thinking please (we modesty-champions are known for further > thoughts?): > > > > If we go with the notion of having Alcor preserve the old kickapoo joy > juice, then we might want to collect and preserve the sample earlier in > life (reduced risk of heart attack or stroke for instance (and we know > everything is still fully functional.)) > > > > If so, all that DNA contains a few carbon 14 atoms, about a part per > trillion. Our carbon comes from our food and drink, ja? I don?t know the > exact mechanism, but I would think the little swimmers are constantly being > renewed and regenerated on a short cycle, so here?s an idea: devour special > food and drink with the C14 removed for a month or two before one > anticipates preserving one?s seed. Since the stuff might need to be > preserved for a long time, a half a century or more, then you don?t want > that stuff decaying and breaking up that good healthy DNA, ja? > > > > Of course, during the C14 purge period, one needs to be sure to get rid of > the older C14-rich swimmers, offering a perfectly legitimate excuse (REASON > rather, not excuse, reason) for one?s behavior. > > > > I have an idea how we could create C14-free food, for C14 is a lot easier > to separate using centrifuges than is U235 (Reasoning: 14/12 > 238/235 by a > lot.) So we create a sealable greenhouse made entirely of glass only and > sealed with silicon bathtub caulk. Grow C14-free veggies in there by first > flushing the volume with lab-grade nitrogen, then re-introducing some > lab-grade oxygen and a bit of water vapor, then send in your specially-made > C14 free CO2 so your veggies can breathe. A few months later: carbon-14 > free veggies, which the rich guy buys from? well? me, at a scandalous > profit of course, but he doesn?t care because he?s rich and? ehhh? > distracted by the? procedure of preparing to preserve his non-radioactive > progeny. > > > > Anyone want to join me? We can even come up with one of those cutesy > business names so popular these days, such as: The Jizz Bizz? > > > > spike > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 5 17:31:48 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:31:48 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <00be01d4ebd5$732ff070$598fd150$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Mike Dougherty Subject: Re: [ExI] dna On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 12:53 PM > wrote: >>?This whole thing has me thinking: I can see some really good justifications for preserving both the complete DNA and all that >?Preserving dna should be about converting it to data via sequencing, then using the usual method for preserving data in the short term (a few decades) or more exotic storage for longer? Awww, Mike, you?re no fun! Just think of all the money I wouldn?t make. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 22:36:39 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:36:39 -0500 Subject: [ExI] tech success Message-ID: Worldwide there are more cell phones than toilets. bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 22:47:07 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:47:07 -0700 Subject: [ExI] tech success In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5EA6189A-DCF2-4821-9F10-6A5CE924AB93@gmail.com> Not a meaningful comparison... How many people ever carried around a toilet? Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst > On Apr 5, 2019, at 3:36 PM, William Flynn Wallace wrote: > > Worldwide there are more cell phones than toilets. > > bill w > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 5 23:11:59 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 16:11:59 -0700 Subject: [ExI] tech success In-Reply-To: <5EA6189A-DCF2-4821-9F10-6A5CE924AB93@gmail.com> References: <5EA6189A-DCF2-4821-9F10-6A5CE924AB93@gmail.com> Message-ID: <006701d4ec04$f8edb7e0$eac927a0$@rainier66.com> On Apr 5, 2019, at 3:36 PM, William Flynn Wallace > wrote: Worldwide there are more cell phones than toilets. bill w _______________________________________________ Makes sense to me. If I had to give up one or the other, the toilet is down the toilet. Hmmm, that analogy doesn?t work in that case. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sat Apr 6 01:36:02 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 18:36:02 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna >?A whole buttload of money - again. How many schemes have you had? Don?t know. Lost count. >?Some serious? Maybe this will work out for you? Ya never know. >?Is drool better than hair? Drool is easier to collect, but keep in mind, hair itself will not work. It has to have the follicle with it. Owwww? >?I'll put up all of my savings, some $3.50 for your company. I'll take half the profits for the idea. Ideas don?t make profits. Companies do. >? Now why didn't I take that idea to the car companies? Never occurred to me? See above. Unless someone puts up a lot of money at risk, there is no profit. Ideas are cheap. >?How do you protect yourself from others stealing your ideas? Walk into the car company's president'office and tell him the future. He'll say thanks and goodbye and you'll never make a penny out of it. bill w Ja of course, but ideas are not valuable. Having one that people will invest in, that is valuable. Just ideas, not. I have an infinite supply of ideas. I am full of it. THEM rather, full of them: ideas. Lots of ideas. Nothing worth investing in. Here?s another one: that previous notion of creating carbon 14-free food so that donors can supply more durable DNA would result in some refined or enriched carbon 14 extracted from the sample to be made into veggies. OK now, get some of that stuff, the right heat and pressure, create C14-rich soot. Now, archaeologist discovers fossil estimated to be about 100k yrs old, a wooly mammoth or something. Creationist sneaks in with the C14-rich soot, gives it a light dusting, sneaks away. Archaeologists finish digging out fossil, send it in for analysis, comes back 5000 years old, creationist shows those evil old archaeologists the biblical flood was right. Then we get to reveal the gag. Oh what fun that would be. There?s an idea for you BillW: a way to cause the C14 tests to show way younger than the material really is. Ready to invest your $3.50? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sat Apr 6 16:13:55 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:13:55 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Ideas are not cheap if they are world-changing. Just gotta influence the money people. Spoofing the religious conservatives seems like a great idea to me. Let me know your method and I"ll send the $3.50. bill w On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:41 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > > > > > > > >?A whole buttload of money - again. How many schemes have you had? > > > > Don?t know. Lost count. > > > > >?Some serious? Maybe this will work out for you? > > > > Ya never know. > > > > >?Is drool better than hair? > > > > Drool is easier to collect, but keep in mind, hair itself will not work. > It has to have the follicle with it. Owwww? > > > > > > >?I'll put up all of my savings, some $3.50 for your company. I'll > take half the profits for the idea. > > > > Ideas don?t make profits. Companies do. > > > > >? Now why didn't I take that idea to the car companies? Never occurred > to me? > > > > See above. Unless someone puts up a lot of money at risk, there is no > profit. Ideas are cheap. > > > > >?How do you protect yourself from others stealing your ideas? Walk into > the car company's president'office and tell him the future. He'll say > thanks and goodbye and you'll never make a penny out of it. bill w > > > > Ja of course, but ideas are not valuable. Having one that people will > invest in, that is valuable. Just ideas, not. I have an infinite supply > of ideas. I am full of it. THEM rather, full of them: ideas. Lots of > ideas. Nothing worth investing in. > > > > Here?s another one: that previous notion of creating carbon 14-free food > so that donors can supply more durable DNA would result in some refined or > enriched carbon 14 extracted from the sample to be made into veggies. > > > > OK now, get some of that stuff, the right heat and pressure, create > C14-rich soot. Now, archaeologist discovers fossil estimated to be about > 100k yrs old, a wooly mammoth or something. Creationist sneaks in with the > C14-rich soot, gives it a light dusting, sneaks away. Archaeologists > finish digging out fossil, send it in for analysis, comes back 5000 years > old, creationist shows those evil old archaeologists the biblical flood was > right. > > > > Then we get to reveal the gag. > > > > Oh what fun that would be. > > > > There?s an idea for you BillW: a way to cause the C14 tests to show way > younger than the material really is. > > > > Ready to invest your $3.50? > > > > spike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sat Apr 6 18:03:52 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 13:03:52 -0500 Subject: [ExI] tech success In-Reply-To: <006701d4ec04$f8edb7e0$eac927a0$@rainier66.com> References: <5EA6189A-DCF2-4821-9F10-6A5CE924AB93@gmail.com> <006701d4ec04$f8edb7e0$eac927a0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: OK, Spike, take Dan's idea and run with it: create toilets that can be carried around. This is your greatest challenge! bill w On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 6:16 PM wrote: > > > On Apr 5, 2019, at 3:36 PM, William Flynn Wallace > wrote: > > Worldwide there are more cell phones than toilets. > > > > bill w > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Makes sense to me. If I had to give up one or the other, the toilet is > down the toilet. Hmmm, that analogy doesn?t work in that case. > > > > spike > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sun Apr 7 06:21:28 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 23:21:28 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna >?Ideas are not cheap if they are world-changing?. Ja. All my ideas are cheap. Therefore they are world-stays-the-saming. Since we are told the world is coming to an end in 12 years because of climate change, we must take follow my ideas on climate change. Result: climate stays the same. Problem solved. BillW, see how easy this is? Three dollars and fifty cents please. >?Spoofing the religious conservatives seems like a great idea to me. Let me know your method and I"ll send the $3.50. bill w I thought of some better ideas with the whole concept. It depends on how much it costs to get a sample carbon-14 dated. If it isn?t expensive, or a university has a machine which they use to train students (so it is done with volunteer/slave labor and doesn?t cost much of anything) then I can imagine some fun stuff we can do. For instance, well sure, mess with the creationists heads (as if their heads haven?t already been messed with too much.) But once we pull that gag, think of the other. We created 14C-free veggies, well OK we can create 14C-enriched veggies in a similar fashion. Background abundance of 14C is about one part per trillion. Imagine we go on a 14C-enriched diet, then measure the abundance of 14C in various tissues in the body over time. I would be willing to extract a blood sample every month and of course?the other?and we could take a sample of something like skin (depending on how much the test needs (is 10 mg enough?)) and a sample of bone (filings from a tooth?) then see how the 14C levels change over time. Assuming I don?t get too carried away with collecting samples of? the other? it would be really cool to make graphs showing how often various tissues are perfused with carbon from our diet. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 19:10:48 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 14:10:48 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Did not catch your ideas on climate change which make it stay the same. But otherwise, fine and OK, and do you accept Paypal? bill w On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:42 AM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > > > >?Ideas are not cheap if they are world-changing?. > > > > Ja. All my ideas are cheap. Therefore they are world-stays-the-saming. > > > > Since we are told the world is coming to an end in 12 years because of > climate change, we must take follow my ideas on climate change. Result: > climate stays the same. Problem solved. BillW, see how easy this is? > Three dollars and fifty cents please. > > > > >?Spoofing the religious conservatives seems like a great idea to me. > Let me know your method and I"ll send the $3.50. > > > > bill w > > > > > > I thought of some better ideas with the whole concept. It depends on how > much it costs to get a sample carbon-14 dated. If it isn?t expensive, or a > university has a machine which they use to train students (so it is done > with volunteer/slave labor and doesn?t cost much of anything) then I can > imagine some fun stuff we can do. > > > > For instance, well sure, mess with the creationists heads (as if their > heads haven?t already been messed with too much.) > > > > But once we pull that gag, think of the other. We created 14C-free > veggies, well OK we can create 14C-enriched veggies in a similar fashion. > Background abundance of 14C is about one part per trillion. Imagine we go > on a 14C-enriched diet, then measure the abundance of 14C in various > tissues in the body over time. I would be willing to extract a blood > sample every month and of course?the other?and we could take a sample of > something like skin (depending on how much the test needs (is 10 mg > enough?)) and a sample of bone (filings from a tooth?) then see how the 14C > levels change over time. Assuming I don?t get too carried away with > collecting samples of? the other? it would be really cool to make graphs > showing how often various tissues are perfused with carbon from our diet. > > > > spike > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sun Apr 7 19:43:12 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 12:43:12 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna >?Did not catch your ideas on climate change which make it stay the same?. Word play, me lad! You commented: >?Ideas are not cheap if they are world-changing?. Multiply by negative one: my ideas are cheap, which equals not not cheap, Then not not cheap equals not world-changing equals worlds stays-the-saming. If the goal is climate staying the same (which I question (what?s so great about it now?)) then cheap ideas keep climate the same. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 20:09:06 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:09:06 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Missed it. Still waiting for the portable toilet. My aunt spend WWII in Shanghai. Shit everywhere. People just step off the road, lift the clothing and let go. Since Shanghai now has over 20 million people, there is a big job for someone with a shovel. bill w On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 2:47 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > > > > > > > > > >?Did not catch your ideas on climate change which make it stay the same?. > > > > Word play, me lad! You commented: >?Ideas are not cheap if they are > world-changing?. > > Multiply by negative one: my ideas are cheap, which equals not not > cheap, Then not not cheap equals not world-changing equals worlds > stays-the-saming. > > > > If the goal is climate staying the same (which I question (what?s so great > about it now?)) then cheap ideas keep climate the same. > > > > spike > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sun Apr 7 20:44:11 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:44:11 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace >?My aunt spend WWII in Shanghai. Shit everywhere. People just step off the road, lift the clothing and let go? Now you hafta go to San Francisco to do that. >?Since Shanghai now has over 20 million people, there is a big job for someone with a shovel. bill w Ja, that?s different now. It isn?t legal in California to clean up that particular hazardous waste without a hazmat team. Hazardous Materials Regulation 49 CRF sections 110-184 explain shit in excruciating detail, the procedures needed to dispose of it and so forth. These were all passed before it became the fashion to shit on the sidewalk in San Francisco, so a shovel is insufficient, so now, since shit can reasonably be expected to contain human-effecting pathogens, it is in the dreaded division 6.2 hazardous material. A shovel won?t do: there is no way to verify the site is safe afterwards. Needless to say, the HazMat people are having a heyday. In order to clean up a pile legally, they need to bring out their crew, don their space suits and do their thing. Removing one pile legally in California is said to cost $3k. When the story broke about all the stoners using the sidewalk as their public toilet, the San Francisco Chronicle ran a story with one of the city guys assigned the unenviable task of hosing the streets and sidewalks. He was washing human excreta into the storm drain. You really really just can?t do that shit, not in California you can?t, and especially not in the holy city of San Francisco, perish the thought. The cost of removing all that waste legally would break the city financially, and it is illegal to hose it into the storm drain, so? there it sits. I don?t go in there much anymore. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 21:20:40 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 16:20:40 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Arrest stoners on misdemeanor charges and find hazmat suits that fit them. A sprinkle of slaked lime will kill anything after it's been shoveled up. Talk about too much regulation.............. bill w On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 3:48 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > > > > > > > > >?My aunt spend WWII in Shanghai. Shit everywhere. People just step off > the road, lift the clothing and let go? > > > > Now you hafta go to San Francisco to do that. > > > > >?Since Shanghai now has over 20 million people, there is a big job for > someone with a shovel. > > > > bill w > > > > > > Ja, that?s different now. It isn?t legal in California to clean up that > particular hazardous waste without a hazmat team. Hazardous Materials > Regulation 49 CRF sections 110-184 explain shit in excruciating detail, the > procedures needed to dispose of it and so forth. These were all passed > before it became the fashion to shit on the sidewalk in San Francisco, so a > shovel is insufficient, so now, since shit can reasonably be expected to > contain human-effecting pathogens, it is in the dreaded division 6.2 > hazardous material. A shovel won?t do: there is no way to verify the site > is safe afterwards. > > > > Needless to say, the HazMat people are having a heyday. > > > > In order to clean up a pile legally, they need to bring out their crew, > don their space suits and do their thing. Removing one pile legally in > California is said to cost $3k. > > > > When the story broke about all the stoners using the sidewalk as their > public toilet, the San Francisco Chronicle ran a story with one of the city > guys assigned the unenviable task of hosing the streets and sidewalks. He > was washing human excreta into the storm drain. You really really just > can?t do that shit, not in California you can?t, and especially not in the > holy city of San Francisco, perish the thought. The cost of removing all > that waste legally would break the city financially, and it is illegal to > hose it into the storm drain, so? there it sits. > > > > I don?t go in there much anymore. > > > > spike > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sun Apr 7 21:42:29 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 14:42:29 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna >?Arrest stoners on misdemeanor charges and find hazmat suits that fit them. A sprinkle of slaked lime will kill anything after it's been shoveled up? BillW if there is a simple solution, is it not astonishing no one has proposed it? There is little risk that San Francisco will reverse generations of tradition and try to make dope illegal again. Even if they did, putting convicts to work is illegal unless they volunteer, which stoners are unlikely to do, since they would be having withdrawal symptoms while in the tank. Even if so, San Francisco has not nearly the prison capacity for the magnitude of their problem. >?Talk about too much regulation.............. bill w Regulation is far easier to pass than it is to revoke. Recall it was the representative from San Francisco who famously quoted ?We have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of controversy.? All those hazmat regs were passed, now we are away from the fog of controversy and we find out what is in it. They can?t remove the stoners, they can?t afford to clean up the mess legally, they can?t wash it down the storm drain. So there it sits. Countdown to a cholera epidemic? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 22:10:47 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 17:10:47 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: There is no provision for community service? bill w On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 4:47 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > > > > > > > >?Arrest stoners on misdemeanor charges and find hazmat suits that fit > them. A sprinkle of slaked lime will kill anything after it's been > shoveled up? > > > > BillW if there is a simple solution, is it not astonishing no one has > proposed it? > > > > There is little risk that San Francisco will reverse generations of > tradition and try to make dope illegal again. Even if they did, putting > convicts to work is illegal unless they volunteer, which stoners are > unlikely to do, since they would be having withdrawal symptoms while in the > tank. Even if so, San Francisco has not nearly the prison capacity for the > magnitude of their problem. > > > > > > >?Talk about too much regulation.............. bill w > > > > Regulation is far easier to pass than it is to revoke. Recall it was the > representative from San Francisco who famously quoted ?We have to pass the > bill so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of controversy.? > > > > All those hazmat regs were passed, now we are away from the fog of > controversy and we find out what is in it. They can?t remove the stoners, > they can?t afford to clean up the mess legally, they can?t wash it down the > storm drain. So there it sits. Countdown to a cholera epidemic? > > > > spike > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sun Apr 7 22:57:24 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:57:24 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna There is no provision for community service? bill w Not really. No real mechanism for making them show up, or do anything for that matter. Once they get addicted and homeless, the law is pretty helpless under the current system. We don?t know how San Francisco (and Seattle (and Portland (and Los Angeles)))) are going to deal with this mess. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 23:05:43 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 18:05:43 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Oh well. Change the laws. Or give them free tickets to Omaha. Finis bill w On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 6:02 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > There is no provision for community service? bill w > > > > > > Not really. No real mechanism for making them show up, or do anything for > that matter. Once they get addicted and homeless, the law is pretty > helpless under the current system. We don?t know how San Francisco (and > Seattle (and Portland (and Los Angeles)))) are going to deal with this mess. > > > > spike > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sun Apr 7 23:50:38 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 16:50:38 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <003b01d4ed9c$b3e30df0$1ba929d0$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna >?Oh well. Change the laws? They did change the laws. That?s how we got to here. >?Or give them free tickets to Omaha. Plenty of us suspect that?s how a lot of them got here to start with: Omaha bought them free tickets to San Francisco. It worries me; just like everything else, dope evolves. Natural selection over time finds stronger and direct pathways to the dopamine sensors. With today?s recreational drugs, it seems the body?s dopamine system gets all short circuited and messed up so thoroughly there is often no fixing it. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 13:18:19 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:18:19 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <003b01d4ed9c$b3e30df0$1ba929d0$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> <003b01d4ed9c$b3e30df0$1ba929d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Are there any data on what drugs they are taking? Or percentages on mental illness? Generally you don't find a lot of pot users as street people with mental illness. They are using meth, heroin, cocaine and so on. Any data on just how many people are involved? bill w On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 6:55 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > >?Oh well. Change the laws? > > > > They did change the laws. That?s how we got to here. > > > > >?Or give them free tickets to Omaha. > > > > Plenty of us suspect that?s how a lot of them got here to start with: > Omaha bought them free tickets to San Francisco. > > > > It worries me; just like everything else, dope evolves. Natural selection > over time finds stronger and direct pathways to the dopamine sensors. With > today?s recreational drugs, it seems the body?s dopamine system gets all > short circuited and messed up so thoroughly there is often no fixing it. > > > > spike > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Mon Apr 8 13:38:42 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 06:38:42 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> <003b01d4ed9c$b3e30df0$1ba929d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <000901d4ee10$61dc6c30$25954490$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna Are there any data on what drugs they are taking? Or percentages on mental illness? Generally you don't find a lot of pot users as street people with mental illness. They are using meth, heroin, cocaine and so on. Any data on just how many people are involved? bill w It brings a whole new meaning to the term ?San Francisco High.? https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/philmatier/article/San-Francisco-where-street-addicts-outnumber-13571702.php https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gT5NULvRSk spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 14:12:49 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:12:49 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <000901d4ee10$61dc6c30$25954490$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> <003b01d4ed9c$b3e30df0$1ba929d0$@rainier66.com> <000901d4ee10$61dc6c30$25954490$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: Thanks. And Heavens to Murgatroyd! 24k and nowhere to put them. No data on people gotten off the street by using methadone, etc. How are these people eating? Women have something to sell but men don't. Where is the money coming from? bill w On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:43 AM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > Are there any data on what drugs they are taking? Or percentages on > mental illness? Generally you don't find a lot of pot users as street > people with mental illness. They are using meth, heroin, cocaine and so on. > > > > Any data on just how many people are involved? > > > > bill w > > > > > > It brings a whole new meaning to the term ?San Francisco High.? > > > > > https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/philmatier/article/San-Francisco-where-street-addicts-outnumber-13571702.php > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gT5NULvRSk > > > > spike > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Mon Apr 8 14:30:15 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 07:30:15 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> <003b01d4ed9c$b3 e30df0$1ba929d0$@rainier66.com> <000901d4ee10$61dc6c30$25954490$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <001d01d4ee17$962df600$c289e200$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Subject: Re: [ExI] dna >?Thanks. And Heavens to Murgatroyd! 24k and nowhere to put them? 24k was last week. This week it is 25k. >?No data on people gotten off the street by using methadone, etc? Methadone costs money. Heroin is supplied to them somehow. >?How are these people eating? People give them food. It is easy in SF. Vendors have box lunches you can buy at reasonable prices and feel good about actually feeding the hungry instead of giving them money that would make them a robbery target (as well as the giver.) >?Women have something to sell but men don't. Where is the money coming from? bill w BillW, did you overlook the location, San Francisco? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 14:51:14 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:51:14 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <001d01d4ee17$962df600$c289e200$@rainier66.com> References: <003401d4eb4c$61bcec00$2536c400$@rainier66.com> <002f01d4ebcb$f5f99510$e1ecbf30$@rainier66.com> <006c01d4ebcf$611cebf0$2356c3d0$@rainier66.com> <005601d4ec19$18a48640$49ed92c0$@rainier66.com> <00b201d4ed0a$22ec62c0$68c52840$@rainier66.com> <007701d4ed7a$23088160$69198420$@rainier66.com> <00b601d4ed82$a85aee90$f910cbb0$@rainier66.com> <001b01d4ed8a$ccf205b0$66d61110$@rainier66.com> <000e01d4ed95$4468dce0$cd3a96a0$@rainier66.com> <000901d4ee10$61dc6c30$25954490$@rainier66.com> <001d01d4ee17$962df600$c289e200$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: I know SF is rich, but street people aren't, eh? Who is supplying money to feed 24k people? I also assume they are clogging emergency rooms. bill w On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:37 AM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > >?Thanks. And Heavens to Murgatroyd! 24k and nowhere to put them? > > > > 24k was last week. This week it is 25k. > > > > >?No data on people gotten off the street by using methadone, etc? > > > > Methadone costs money. Heroin is supplied to them somehow. > > > > >?How are these people eating? > > > > People give them food. It is easy in SF. Vendors have box lunches you > can buy at reasonable prices and feel good about actually feeding the > hungry instead of giving them money that would make them a robbery target > (as well as the giver.) > > > > >?Women have something to sell but men don't. Where is the money coming > from? bill w > > > > BillW, did you overlook the location, San Francisco? > > > > spike > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 17:17:39 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:17:39 -0500 Subject: [ExI] bad news for T haters Message-ID: In a preface to a collection of scifi stories (Hieroglyph), a theoretical physicist, Lawrence Krauss, says, in an apparent reference to T's head..... "...empty space contains the dominant energy in the universe, producing a kind of cosmic antigravity that will determine our ultimate future." btw - just what the hell does that really mean? bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jrd1415 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 18:48:26 2019 From: jrd1415 at gmail.com (Jeff Davis) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:48:26 -0600 Subject: [ExI] dna Message-ID: Spike, our straight arrow boy scout white boy from Whitelandia writes: "...putting convicts to work is illegal unless they volunteer... " Actually, no. Re Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, w/ attention to: "...except as a punishment for crime ..." *Section 1.* Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. *Section 2.* Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. ************************************************* That said, a further note: Like so many problems that society chooses not to solve despite an obvious, free, and immediately available solution, the "problem" of homeless persons pooping on the street has just such a solution: As everyone knows, the whole frikkin' city is chock full of toilets. Every business, govt office, hospital, library, cop shop, bus station, subway station, and every private residence has several toilets. I would wager that every homeless street dweller is no more that 100ft away from a functioning toilet. So I have no sympathy w/ those who decry this problem. "But, but, but,... those facilities are for..." As with so many issues of modern life, people can choose either to get their head out of their ass or to live in shit. By the way, San Francisco is a big city -- I just got back from a visit -- and the notion that there is shit everywhere is the usual media nonsense. The problem is almost entirely restricted to a very small area of downtown. -- "Everything's hard till you know how to do it." Ray Charles -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 19:00:45 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:00:45 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The problem is almost entirely restricted to a very small area of downtown. J Davis It can't be very small, as Spike says that well over 20K people are homeless addicts. And I don't think that there is any problem with a state or city making laws against prisoner labor. You just can't have it the other way. Is there a valid reason not to put up a slew of PortaPotties? Spike? bill w On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 1:53 PM Jeff Davis wrote: > Spike, our straight arrow boy scout white boy from Whitelandia writes: > > "...putting convicts to work is illegal unless they volunteer... " > > Actually, no. > > Re Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, w/ attention to: > > "...except as a punishment for crime ..." > > *Section 1.* Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a > punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, > shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their > jurisdiction. > > *Section 2.* Congress shall have power to enforce this article by > appropriate legislation. > > ************************************************* > > That said, a further note: Like so many problems that society chooses not > to solve despite an obvious, free, and immediately available solution, the > "problem" of homeless persons pooping on the street has just such a > solution: > > As everyone knows, the whole frikkin' city is chock full of toilets. > Every business, govt office, hospital, library, cop shop, bus station, > subway station, and every private residence has several toilets. I would > wager that every homeless street dweller is no more that 100ft away from a > functioning toilet. So I have no sympathy w/ those who decry this problem. > > "But, but, but,... those facilities are for..." > > As with so many issues of modern life, people can choose either to get > their head out of their ass or to live in shit. > > By the way, San Francisco is a big city -- I just got back from a visit -- > and the notion that there is shit everywhere is the usual media nonsense. > The problem is almost entirely restricted to a very small area of > downtown. > -- > "Everything's hard till you know how to do it." > Ray Charles > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Mon Apr 8 20:42:14 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:42:14 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <006e01d4ee4b$8c8c2660$a5a47320$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Jeff Davis Subject: Re: [ExI] dna >?Spike, our straight arrow boy scout white boy from Whitelandia writes: You flatter me sir. Up until the Whitelandia, it was accurate. Where I grew up, black was about a third of the local population. Where I live now, white is about 4% which scarcely justifies the name. >?"...putting convicts to work is illegal unless they volunteer... " >?Actually, no. >?Re Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, w/ attention to: >?"...except as a punishment for crime ..." Ah, but this is California, with its own legal system. Nobody noticed much until it was contradicting federal law. We see the road cleanup crews, but they can only compel them to participate in exchange for something, such as reduced sentence. Not all do. >?That said, a further note: Like so many problems that society chooses not to solve despite an obvious, free, and immediately available solution, the "problem" of homeless persons pooping on the street has just such a solution? True, however most big cities have homeless shelters well below capacity, as homeless people live in the streets nearby. As I understand it, plenty of homeless will not use the shelters because they don?t like being around other people. >?As with so many issues of modern life, people can choose either to get their head out of their ass or to live in shit? No need to choose: plenty of people do both simultaneously. >?By the way, San Francisco is a big city -- I just got back from a visit -- and the notion that there is shit everywhere is the usual media nonsense. The problem is almost entirely restricted to a very small area of downtown?. Ray Charles and Jeff Davis -- I have heard this: the SF constables do a good job of keeping the homeless away from the waterfront, the airport, the most important business sections where people are likely to go. The homeless people congregate right down there where it was the happening place to be fifty years ago. Well, OK then. I have no objections. I wouldn?t have fit in there then, don?t fit in there now. I have been reading up a bit on some of the proposed solutions. Stoners are people. In many places in the country (and the world) they are treated with disdain and revulsion, but they are people. San Francisco does an admirable job of dealing with them I suppose. I am told you can have a perfectly normal conversation with some of the homeless stoners, and it is clear they are suffering people but human just the same. Heroin doesn?t actually kill the addicts, if they don?t get an overdose. So? big rich city government is kicking around a number of ideas, some of which are plausible. One of the things that kills heroin addicts is the unpredictability of the dose and the purity of the medication. It is expensive, so the local ?pharmacist? mixes with inert ingredients, other stuff that mimics heroin, all manner of junk mixed in there (which is perhaps where the nickname started) but if one is in the habit of using a medication which is half or a third or a quarter actual heroin, then someone comes along with highly purified heroin, the result can be fatal. So? the notion was to get actual pharmaceutical grade heroin, which isn?t all that expensive to make, then let them use that, give it to them. Well now. The problem is that doing this in any quasi-legal way requires a licensed doctor to dispense the meds, and makes the doctor and the city liable for anything that can go wrong. No malpractice insurance company wants to go near that deal, and what about the liability the city holds if a junky shoots up and then perishes? Or kills someone while stoned? Or? plenty of good reasons why that idea is problematic at best. What if a man tracks his runaway daughter to one of these safe-shooting galleries, is horrified to find her emaciated, addicted, but just then the doctor strolls up with a needle, here ya go? and that doctor is slain by the distraught father?s bare hands before anyone can call for security (which wouldn?t help anyway because there isn?t any security.) And what if one were struggling but mostly recovering from addiction, but went into one of the shooting galleries, SF city government offers a sweet treat, addict is worse than ever two weeks later. And what if? there are public toilets everywhere but someone is living in most of them, so the homeless people are still outta luck? I don?t know the answers. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Mon Apr 8 20:45:17 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:45:17 -0700 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <008d01d4ee4b$f9f555f0$ede001d0$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 12:01 PM To: ExI chat list Subject: Re: [ExI] dna The problem is almost entirely restricted to a very small area of downtown. J Davis It can't be very small, as Spike says that well over 20K people are homeless addicts. And I don't think that there is any problem with a state or city making laws against prisoner labor. You just can't have it the other way. Is there a valid reason not to put up a slew of PortaPotties? Spike? bill w Not at all, a city can do that, and SF already has. But people tend to move into them and treat them as their own little zero bedroom one bath apartment. If you go down to that area of town which welcomes the homeless, one can open a public restroom door and find an inert form sitting in there with a needle on the floor next to him or her. Now what? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 21:15:43 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:15:43 -0500 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: <008d01d4ee4b$f9f555f0$ede001d0$@rainier66.com> References: <008d01d4ee4b$f9f555f0$ede001d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: If you go down to that area of town which welcomes the homeless, one can open a public restroom door and find an inert form sitting in there with a needle on the floor next to him or her. Now what? spike Easy - you evict the homeless!! bill w On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *William Flynn Wallace > *Sent:* Monday, April 8, 2019 12:01 PM > *To:* ExI chat list > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] dna > > > > The problem is almost entirely restricted to a very small area of > downtown. J Davis > > > > It can't be very small, as Spike says that well over 20K people are > homeless addicts. And I don't think that there is any problem with a state > or city making laws against prisoner labor. You just can't have it the > other way. Is there a valid reason not to put up a slew of PortaPotties? > Spike? > > > > bill w > > > > > > > > Not at all, a city can do that, and SF already has. But people tend to > move into them and treat them as their own little zero bedroom one bath > apartment. If you go down to that area of town which welcomes the > homeless, one can open a public restroom door and find an inert form > sitting in there with a needle on the floor next to him or her. Now what? > > > > spike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 00:55:22 2019 From: rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com (Rafal Smigrodzki) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 20:55:22 -0400 Subject: [ExI] dna In-Reply-To: References: <008d01d4ee4b$f9f555f0$ede001d0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:20 PM William Flynn Wallace wrote: > > Easy - you evict the homeless!! bill w > ### Yes, I agree! Streets should be privatized and the private security contractors employed by the owners should be authorized to expel undesirables and deter them from entering. Area denial devices, such as stationary and vehicle mounted low power lasers might be used to heat up the skin of undesirables to about 47 degrees Celsius which would be very effective in inducing prompt egress from protected premises. AI will be soon capable of providing control to these devices without costly human input. Paying customers and owner's friends would be unaffected and free to enjoy their morning constitutionals without exposure to excreta or unwelcome sights. Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 12:31:09 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 08:31:09 -0400 Subject: [ExI] =?utf-8?q?LIGO_has_=E2=80=8Balready_found_another_Gravitat?= =?utf-8?q?ional_Wave_=E2=80=8B?= Message-ID: LIGO has only been back on for a few days but already they have detected a new gravitational wave from a Black Hole merger slightly under 5 billion light years away. They've decided to stop most of the secrecy and report things as soon as they find them, so they haven't finished calculating how massive they were yet. Just after turning back on another wave found John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 13:31:19 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:31:19 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! Message-ID: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/science/black-hole-picture.html John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Wed Apr 10 13:49:34 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:49:34 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of John Clark Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/science/black-hole-picture.html John K Clark COOL! I am amazed that it is asymmetric and the thermal spectrum is so non-uniform. Anyone who is into the astronomy scene has become accustomed to being amazed. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From protokol2020 at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 13:49:14 2019 From: protokol2020 at gmail.com (Tomaz Kristan) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:49:14 +0200 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Shouldn't it be the Sagittarius? Much smaller and much closer one? Why is that now? On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:38 PM John Clark wrote: > https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/science/black-hole-picture.html > > John K Clark > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -- https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 14:29:46 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:29:46 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> References: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:54 AM wrote: > COOL! > > I am amazed that it is asymmetric and the thermal spectrum is so > non-uniform. > It looks asymmetric because the matter in the accretion disk is moving very close to the speed of light and as it orbits some of it is going toward us and some is going away so one side looks brighter than the other. The inner edge of the bright part comes from the photosphere, the last place where light can stably orbit and has a radius of 1.5 times the Schwarzschild event horizon, however because gravity is so strong we are able to see the back side of the Black Hole too so it works out that the dark part in the center of the picture is 2.6 times the radius of the event horizon. To the limits of measurement it looks exactly how Einstein said it should, it would have been even more exciting if it didn't. I assume they chose to image M87 instead of the Black Hole in the center of our own galaxy because it is about 1000 times more massive. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From protokol2020 at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 15:30:37 2019 From: protokol2020 at gmail.com (Tomaz Kristan) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:30:37 +0200 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: > because it is about 1000 times more massive. Yeah, but Sagittarius is 2000 times closer. Per unit of mass therefore 4000000 million times more luminous. 4000 times more luminous in absolute terms. Sagittarius should be the most "luminous" black hole for us, just as the Sun is the most luminous star for us. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:34 PM John Clark wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:54 AM wrote: > > > COOL! >> >> I am amazed that it is asymmetric and the thermal spectrum is so >> non-uniform. >> > > It looks asymmetric because the matter in the accretion disk is moving > very close to the speed of light and as it orbits some of it is going > toward us and some is going away so one side looks brighter than the other. > The inner edge of the bright part comes from the photosphere, the last > place where light can stably orbit and has a radius of 1.5 times > the Schwarzschild event horizon, however because gravity is so strong we > are able to see the back side of the Black Hole too so it works out that > the dark part in the center of the picture is 2.6 times the radius of the > event horizon. To the limits of measurement it looks exactly how Einstein > said it should, it would have been even more exciting if it didn't. > > I assume they chose to image M87 instead of the Black Hole in the center > of our own galaxy because it is about 1000 times more massive. > > John K Clark > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -- https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From protokol2020 at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 15:56:12 2019 From: protokol2020 at gmail.com (Tomaz Kristan) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:56:12 +0200 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: > 4000000 million Should be 4000000. Sorry for the typo. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:30 PM Tomaz Kristan wrote: > > because it is about 1000 times more massive. > > Yeah, but Sagittarius is 2000 times closer. Per unit of mass therefore > 4000000 million times more luminous. 4000 times more luminous in absolute > terms. > > Sagittarius should be the most "luminous" black hole for us, just as the > Sun is the most luminous star for us. > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:34 PM John Clark wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:54 AM wrote: >> >> > COOL! >>> >>> I am amazed that it is asymmetric and the thermal spectrum is so >>> non-uniform. >>> >> >> It looks asymmetric because the matter in the accretion disk is moving >> very close to the speed of light and as it orbits some of it is going >> toward us and some is going away so one side looks brighter than the other. >> The inner edge of the bright part comes from the photosphere, the last >> place where light can stably orbit and has a radius of 1.5 times >> the Schwarzschild event horizon, however because gravity is so strong we >> are able to see the back side of the Black Hole too so it works out >> that the dark part in the center of the picture is 2.6 times the radius of >> the event horizon. To the limits of measurement it looks exactly how >> Einstein said it should, it would have been even more exciting if it didn't. >> >> I assume they chose to image M87 instead of the Black Hole in the center >> of our own galaxy because it is about 1000 times more massive. >> >> John K Clark >> _______________________________________________ >> extropy-chat mailing list >> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org >> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat >> > > > -- > https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ > -- https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 16:04:07 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:04:07 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: They said they're going to try to get a picture of Sagittarius A Star next but It's not entirely clear to me why they chose M87 first. I'm just guessing but I do know that the luminosity of a supermassive Black Hole has more to do with the amount of gas outside that is falling into it than the mass of the hole, and the important thing as far as pictures are concerned is not the luminosity but the resolution. Another factor may be that because we're in the Galaxy we have to look through it to see the center and that means looking through lots more obscuring dust than to see the Black Hole in M87. John K Clark On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:36 AM Tomaz Kristan wrote: > > because it is about 1000 times more massive. > > Yeah, but Sagittarius is 2000 times closer. Per unit of mass therefore > 4000000 million times more luminous. 4000 times more luminous in absolute > terms. > > Sagittarius should be the most "luminous" black hole for us, just as the > Sun is the most luminous star for us. > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:34 PM John Clark wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:54 AM wrote: >> >> > COOL! >>> >>> I am amazed that it is asymmetric and the thermal spectrum is so >>> non-uniform. >>> >> >> It looks asymmetric because the matter in the accretion disk is moving >> very close to the speed of light and as it orbits some of it is going >> toward us and some is going away so one side looks brighter than the other. >> The inner edge of the bright part comes from the photosphere, the last >> place where light can stably orbit and has a radius of 1.5 times >> the Schwarzschild event horizon, however because gravity is so strong we >> are able to see the back side of the Black Hole too so it works out >> that the dark part in the center of the picture is 2.6 times the radius of >> the event horizon. To the limits of measurement it looks exactly how >> Einstein said it should, it would have been even more exciting if it didn't. >> >> I assume they chose to image M87 instead of the Black Hole in the center >> of our own galaxy because it is about 1000 times more massive. >> >> John K Clark >> _______________________________________________ >> extropy-chat mailing list >> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org >> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat >> > > > -- > https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 16:25:46 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:25:46 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:36 AM Tomaz Kristan wrote: > Yeah, but Sagittarius is 2000 times closer. > And M87 is about 1600 times larger than Sagittarius (not 1000 as I said before) so from Earth they should have almost the same angular size, and there would be less dust to look through with M87. That must have been the reason they picked it. John K Clark > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 17:13:42 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:13:42 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: I thought of another reason for picking M87, it's located near the equator so radio telescopes in both hemispheres can see it but the center of the Milky Way can only be seen in the southern hemisphere. The resolution they achieved is really amazing, it's equivalent to reading the date on a dime in Los Angeles from New York. Another record they achieved is the fastest data transfer when they put several tons of state of the art hard drives on a 747 and flew them across the atlantic. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From protokol2020 at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 23:13:49 2019 From: protokol2020 at gmail.com (Tomaz Kristan) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 01:13:49 +0200 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <000d01d4efa4$3bbc2cd0$b3348670$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: And then they swiftly changed one planeload of hard drives data with another planeload of hard drives data. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 7:18 PM John Clark wrote: > I thought of another reason for picking M87, it's located near the > equator so radio telescopes in both hemispheres can see it but the center > of the Milky Way can only be seen in the southern hemisphere. The > resolution they achieved is really amazing, it's equivalent to reading the > date on a dime in Los Angeles from New York. Another record they achieved > is the fastest data transfer when they put several tons of state of the art > hard drives on a 747 and flew them across the atlantic. > > John K Clark > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -- https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Thu Apr 11 01:26:10 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:26:10 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! Message-ID: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Tomaz Kristan wrote: > > Shouldn't it be the Sagittarius? Much smaller and much closer one? > > Why is that now? > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:38 PM John Clark wrote: > >> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/science/black-hole-picture.html >> As John pointed out their angular widths should be about almost equal at 5:4 for SgrA* vs M-87*. While there is a lot of dust between us and SgrA*, that shouldn't affect meters-wide radiowaves. So my guess is that the paper published back in January that suggested that the radio jet of Sagittarius A* is pointed directly at us is actually correct. http://www.astronomy.com/news/2019/01/radio-jets-from-the-milky-ways-black-hole-could-be-pointing-right-at-earth The radio jet pointing directly at us would make the picture of SgrA* just look like a bright blotch of light with no dark "shadow" apparent so it would not look much like a "black" hole. Even in the picture M-87* they have, the shadow is not quite as dark as the peripheral space suggesting there is some radio emission occurring between it and us. And also, I know they billed it as a mere "picture" but would it have killed them to put in some form of scale or the galactic plane of M-87 or something for reference? The shadow of the BH looks like an ellipse elongated in the NE to SW direction. That could be the equatorial plane of the black hole's rotation in which case it would be spinning pretty fast. But with no frame of reference it might as well be a photo of a UFO. Stuart LaForge From dsunley at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 03:11:53 2019 From: dsunley at gmail.com (Darin Sunley) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:11:53 -0600 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: Ask, and ye shall receive : https://xkcd.com/2135/ On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:59 PM Stuart LaForge wrote: > > Tomaz Kristan wrote: > > > > > Shouldn't it be the Sagittarius? Much smaller and much closer one? > > > > Why is that now? > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:38 PM John Clark wrote: > > > >> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/science/black-hole-picture.html > >> > > As John pointed out their angular widths should be about almost equal > at 5:4 for SgrA* vs M-87*. While there is a lot of dust between us and > SgrA*, that shouldn't affect meters-wide radiowaves. So my guess is > that the paper published back in January that suggested that the radio > jet of Sagittarius A* is pointed directly at us is actually correct. > > > http://www.astronomy.com/news/2019/01/radio-jets-from-the-milky-ways-black-hole-could-be-pointing-right-at-earth > > The radio jet pointing directly at us would make the picture of SgrA* > just look like a bright blotch of light with no dark "shadow" apparent > so it would not look much like a "black" hole. Even in the picture > M-87* they have, the shadow is not quite as dark as the peripheral > space suggesting there is some radio emission occurring between it and > us. > > And also, I know they billed it as a mere "picture" but would it have > killed them to put in some form of scale or the galactic plane of M-87 > or something for reference? The shadow of the BH looks like an ellipse > elongated in the NE to SW direction. That could be the equatorial > plane of the black hole's rotation in which case it would be spinning > pretty fast. But with no frame of reference it might as well be a > photo of a UFO. > > Stuart LaForge > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Thu Apr 11 05:07:36 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 22:07:36 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: <006001d4f024$7af013f0$70d03bd0$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Darin Sunley Subject: Re: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! >?And also, I know they billed it as a mere "picture" but would it have killed them to put in some form of scale or the galactic plane of M-87 or something for reference? Stuart Ask, and ye shall receive : https://xkcd.com/2135/ Can we elect Randall Monroe as God? Is he running for that job? When can I start praying to him? Anyone know which direction I need to face when I do? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 11:39:01 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:39:01 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:00 PM Stuart LaForge wrote: > > > * > As John pointed out their angular widths should be about almost equal > at 5:4 for SgrA* vs M-87*. While there is a lot of dust between us and > SgrA*, that shouldn't affect meters-wide radiowaves.* Meter-wide waves couldn't give you the resolution required even with a telescope the size of the Earth, they used millimeter and sub-millimeter microwaves. John K Clark > The radio jet pointing directly at us would make the picture of SgrA* > just look like a bright blotch of light with no dark "shadow" apparent > so it would not look much like a "black" hole. Even in the picture > M-87* they have, the shadow is not quite as dark as the peripheral > space suggesting there is some radio emission occurring between it and > us. > > And also, I know they billed it as a mere "picture" but would it have > killed them to put in some form of scale or the galactic plane of M-87 > or something for reference? The shadow of the BH looks like an ellipse > elongated in the NE to SW direction. That could be the equatorial > plane of the black hole's rotation in which case it would be spinning > pretty fast. But with no frame of reference it might as well be a > photo of a UFO. > > Stuart LaForge > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 12:06:37 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:06:37 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:17 PM Darin Sunley wrote: Ask, and ye shall receive : > > https://xkcd.com/2135/ > It's interesting that because the density of a Black Hole is inversely proportional to the square of the mass the density of M87's Black Hole is about that of air. Well it is if you count the Event Horizon as being the boundary of the thing; Einstein says there is a point of infinite density at the center although Quantum Mechanics disagrees. Nobody knows who's right. John K Clark > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From protokol2020 at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 15:54:01 2019 From: protokol2020 at gmail.com (Tomaz Kristan) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:54:01 +0200 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: > the density of M87's Black Hole is about that of air. Which is incredibly cool. But if an interpretation of the Holographic Principle is true, then a black hole has no interior, just its event horizon, where all the mass resides. Or rather, its volume is indistinguishable from its surface, the event horizon. All area, no volume, just a 2D quantum screen. I am not sure, that this would be any cooler. Thinner then air may still be cooler. On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 2:11 PM John Clark wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:17 PM Darin Sunley wrote: > > Ask, and ye shall receive : >> >> https://xkcd.com/2135/ >> > > It's interesting that because the density of a Black Hole is inversely > proportional to the square of the mass the density of M87's Black Hole is > about that of air. Well it is if you count the Event Horizon as being the > boundary of the thing; Einstein says there is a point of infinite density > at the center although Quantum Mechanics disagrees. Nobody knows who's > right. > > John K Clark > > > >> _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -- https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 16:57:42 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:57:42 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:00 PM Tomaz Kristan wrote: *> incredibly cool. But if an interpretation of the Holographic Principle > is true, then a black hole has no interior, just its event horizon, where > all the mass resides.* Speaking of cool...the picture of the Black Hole we saw yesterday is at the center of M87, a giant elliptical galaxy, one of the largest known, that has 200 times as many stars as the Milky Way. And M87 is at the center of the Virgo cluster which contains 1300 Galaxies. And the Virgo cluster is at the center of the Virgo supercluster, a cluster of clusters, and one of those clusters is the "Local Group" that contains Andromeda, the Milky Way, and a few dwarf galaxies. So the Earth goes around the sun, and the sun goes around the center of the Milky Way and the Milky Way goes around the center of the Local Group and the Local Group goes around the Virgo Supercluster and the center of the Virgo Supercluster is the Virgo Cluster and the center of the Virgo Cluster is M87 and the center of M87 is the black Hole we saw yesterday and the center of that is a mystery. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Thu Apr 11 17:26:54 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:26:54 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of John Clark >?and the center of the Virgo Cluster is M87 and the center of M87 is the black Hole we saw yesterday and the center of that is a mystery. John K Clark Oh my Evolution, what a time to be living. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From protokol2020 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 09:07:15 2019 From: protokol2020 at gmail.com (Tomaz Kristan) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:07:15 +0200 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: What can be even cooler than the accretion disk around a black hole? No accretion disk around a black hole. Instead some stars behind that black hole. Their images pretty much gravity lensed by the black hole. That's why I insist on to see Sagittarius. On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:32 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* extropy-chat *On Behalf > Of *John Clark > > > > > > *>?*and the center of the Virgo Cluster is M87 and the center of M87 is > the black Hole we saw yesterday and the center of that is a mystery. > > > > John K Clark > > > > > > > > Oh my Evolution, what a time to be living. > > > > spike > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -- https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 12:36:07 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:36:07 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 5:14 AM Tomaz Kristan wrote: *> What can be even cooler than the accretion disk around a black hole? * > > *No accretion disk around a black hole. Instead some stars behind that > black hole. Their images pretty much gravity lensed by the black hole. > That's why I insist on to see Sagittarius.* > Why is that important? Plenty of things can cause detectable gravitational lensing, even our own sun can do it, but as far as we know the only thing that can cause a large star moving at 4800 miles a second make a super tight hairpin turn around a point that emits no light is a 4 million solar mass Black Hole. And we've been observing that for years. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05825-3 John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 12 12:42:36 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:42:36 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> From: Tomaz Kristan Subject: Re: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! >?What can be even cooler than the accretion disk around a black hole? >?No accretion disk around a black hole. Instead some stars behind that black hole. Their images pretty much gravity lensed by the black hole. That's why I insist on to see Sagittarius. Ja, because the accretion disk blocks the faint gravity lensed images of the stuff behind it. I am struggling to understand why an accretion disk looks like this. The whole thing is baffling, defying my intuition violently. For starters, I don?t see why so much of the material is approximately in one plane. My best guess is that it is mostly from one star, then as other material in other orbit planes comes down, it collides with material primarily in that very visible plane. Oh this is so cool. I am a total data addict: I have had that one monster hit, now I want another one. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 12 12:51:49 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:51:49 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <002201d4f12e$7f0a2d30$7d1e8790$@rainier66.com> From: spike at rainier66.com Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 5:43 AM To: 'Tomaz Kristan' ; 'ExI chat list' Cc: spike at rainier66.com Subject: RE: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! From: Tomaz Kristan > Subject: Re: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! >?What can be even cooler than the accretion disk around a black hole? >?No accretion disk around a black hole. Instead some stars behind that black hole. Their images pretty much gravity lensed by the black hole. That's why I insist on to see Sagittarius. Ja, because the accretion disk blocks the faint gravity lensed images of the stuff behind it. I am struggling to understand why an accretion disk looks like this. The whole thing is baffling, defying my intuition violently. For starters, I don?t see why so much of the material is approximately in one plane. My best guess is that it is mostly from one star, then as other material in other orbit planes comes down, it collides with material primarily in that very visible plane. Oh this is so cool. I am a total data addict: I have had that one monster hit, now I want another one. spike Oh boy, retract, I realized what I am seeing and answered my own question: the image isn?t what I was thinking. It occurred to me that there is material in various orbits. However because of lensing, the light from the accretion disk will always appear circular from every point of view everywhere. Oh I have so much to learn. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From protokol2020 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 12:59:13 2019 From: protokol2020 at gmail.com (Tomaz Kristan) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:59:13 +0200 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <002201d4f12e$7f0a2d30$7d1e8790$@rainier66.com> References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> <002201d4f12e$7f0a2d30$7d1e8790$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: > Why is that important? Plenty of things can cause detectable gravitational lensing Because we MIGHT see a very enlarged star there. Like through a natural magnifying lens. On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:51 PM wrote: > > > > > *From:* spike at rainier66.com > *Sent:* Friday, April 12, 2019 5:43 AM > *To:* 'Tomaz Kristan' ; 'ExI chat list' < > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> > *Cc:* spike at rainier66.com > *Subject:* RE: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! > > > > > > > > *From:* Tomaz Kristan > *Subject:* Re: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! > > > > >?What can be even cooler than the accretion disk around a black hole? > > > > >?No accretion disk around a black hole. Instead some stars behind that > black hole. Their images pretty much gravity lensed by the black hole. > That's why I insist on to see Sagittarius. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ja, because the accretion disk blocks the faint gravity lensed images of > the stuff behind it. > > > > I am struggling to understand why an accretion disk looks like this. The > whole thing is baffling, defying my intuition violently. For starters, I > don?t see why so much of the material is approximately in one plane. My > best guess is that it is mostly from one star, then as other material in > other orbit planes comes down, it collides with material primarily in that > very visible plane. > > > > Oh this is so cool. I am a total data addict: I have had that one monster > hit, now I want another one. > > > > spike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh boy, retract, I realized what I am seeing and answered my own question: > the image isn?t what I was thinking. It occurred to me that there is > material in various orbits. However because of lensing, the light from the > accretion disk will always appear circular from every point of view > everywhere. Oh I have so much to learn. > > > > spike > > > > > > > > > -- https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 13:12:22 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 06:12:22 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Another branch on the tree Message-ID: <91FA5BAE-0464-45E9-88D7-149E1F3F7744@gmail.com> https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01152-3 Too bad H. erectus populations didn?t make it to the Western Hemisphere... Anyhow, not surprised yet another island species has been found. Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 13:20:56 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:20:56 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 8:54 AM wrote: > *I don?t see why so much of the material is approximately in one plane.* Actually part of what you're seeing is light from the accretion disk from behind the Black Hole that normally you couldn't see but because of the intense gravity bending light around it you can. For example, the hole in the doenut should be 1.5 times the Schwarzwild radius (because there are no stable orbits between 1 and 1.5) but because of the distortion caused by gravity bending light the hole in the doenut looks to us as if it has a radius of 2.6 times the Schwarzwild radius. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 13:36:46 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:36:46 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> <002201d4f12e$7f0a2d30$7d1e8790$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:18 AM Tomaz Kristan wrote: >> Why is that important? Plenty of things can cause detectable >> gravitational lensing > > > *> Because we MIGHT see a very enlarged star there. Like through a natural > magnifying lens.* > The probability that the line from Earth to something as small as a star should just happen to pass super close to something as small as a Black Hole is extremely low. But there are lots of lines from Earth to something as large as a galaxy and there is a pretty good chance that one of them will pass close to something as large as another galaxy. That's why we've seen gravitational lensing of distant galaxies caused by nearer galaxies but have not seen the same thing in stars. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 12 14:21:51 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 07:21:51 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <003d01d4f13b$131f7460$395e5d20$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of John Clark Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 6:21 AM To: ExI chat list Subject: Re: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 8:54 AM > wrote: > I don?t see why so much of the material is approximately in one plane. Actually part of what you're seeing is light from the accretion disk from behind the Black Hole that normally you couldn't see but because of the intense gravity bending light around it you can. For example, the hole in the doenut should be 1.5 times the Schwarzwild radius (because there are no stable orbits between 1 and 1.5) but because of the distortion caused by gravity bending light the hole in the doenut looks to us as if it has a radius of 2.6 times the Schwarzwild radius. John K Clark Ja I pondered why that image would look like that and came to these conclusions except without the numbers. The cool thing about this is that it confirms the math: we can calculate the Schwarzschild radius based on the inner radius of the photo-ring, then do it a second way based on red/blue shifts of the nearby orbiting stars, and see that the mass agrees with the calcs. Through all this, I am astonished at how much mass is in there. It also makes me understand why the LIGO results keep coming back with two black holes of the same magnitude rather than a smaller black hole with a biggie. Reason: the really biggies don?t make that kind of signal when they eat a smaller black hole. Another reminder of a calc I did some time ago: given a big enough black hole, the event horizon doesn?t have that huge gravitational gradient. From the point of view of the outside world, an object passing into the event horizon of one of these biggies would disappear into a red (well, very red) whoosh, but from the point of view of the object, not much happened. Yet. Hmmm, I might need to retract that notion too: the clock of the object slowed down to nothing as it passes into the event horizon. Black holes are so cool. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 12 17:10:49 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:10:49 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <003d01d4f13b$131f7460$395e5d20$@rainier66.com> References: <20190410182610.Horde.U32t-dx0_bk7QAt0X-RI-yG@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <000501d4f08b$c2719110$4754b330$@rainier66.com> <000c01d4f12d$35d30070$a1790150$@rainier66.com> <003d01d4f13b$131f7460$395e5d20$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <000001d4f152$ad5b96a0$0812c3e0$@rainier66.com> From: spike at rainier66.com >?Ja I pondered why that image would look like that and came to these conclusions except without the numbers. The cool thing about this is that it confirms the math: we can calculate the Schwarzschild radius based on the inner radius of the photo-ring, then do it a second way based on red/blue shifts of the nearby orbiting stars, and see that the mass agrees with the calcs?spike Even cooler: it occurred to me that a smaller black hole would have a circular ring that is smaller of course but also more uniform and more tightly packed. Oh I learned a lot from that image. Fun aside: Einstein was sitting around thinking of all these things way back over 100 yrs ago, and going way the hell deeper in it than I can follow even now. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 19:47:43 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:47:43 -0500 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides Message-ID: Examples of right-wing anti-science: 1. Creationism. 2. Global warming denialism. 3. Anti-environmentalism generally. 4. Exaggerated claims about fetal development. 5. Rejection of epidemiology as it pertains to sex, pregnancy, and sexually transmitted disease. 6. Rejection of genetics, neurology, and psychology as they pertain to sex and gender. 7. Pseudo-biological justifications for racism and sexism. 8. Supply-side economics, if you count economics as a science. That?s a whole ?nother discussion. Examples of left-wing anti-science: 1. Anti-GMO hysteria. 2. Opposition to nuclear power under any and all circumstances. 3. Other extremes of environmentalism, with predictions of immediate doom rather than slow long-term change. 4. Opposition to space exploration: ?why are we spending money up there when people are starving down here?? Examples of anti-science shared by both left and right: 1. Antivax. Started as a left-wing mania, and still more common in liberal communities, but some of the most prominent advocates are right-wing politicians, e.g. Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin. 2. Abuse of statistics regarding crime issues, especially gun control. Left- and right-wingers draw opposite conclusions from the same data, and they both go to absurd extremes. Principled statisticians are left crying in the wilderness. 3. Suspicion of the enterprise of science: the idea that there are giant cabals of scientists working in secret with no oversight and ?playing God? or uncovering ?things we weren?t meant to know.? 4. Closely related, the common cultural stereotypes of scientists as arrogant, aloof, and out of touch with the lives of ?regular people.? bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 19:57:12 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:57:12 -0700 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: From Quora, no? Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst > On Apr 12, 2019, at 12:47 PM, William Flynn Wallace wrote: > > > Examples of right-wing anti-science: > > Creationism. > Global warming denialism. > Anti-environmentalism generally. > Exaggerated claims about fetal development. > Rejection of epidemiology as it pertains to sex, pregnancy, and sexually transmitted disease. > Rejection of genetics, neurology, and psychology as they pertain to sex and gender. > Pseudo-biological justifications for racism and sexism. > Supply-side economics, if you count economics as a science. That?s a whole ?nother discussion. > Examples of left-wing anti-science: > > Anti-GMO hysteria. > Opposition to nuclear power under any and all circumstances. > Other extremes of environmentalism, with predictions of immediate doom rather than slow long-term change. > Opposition to space exploration: ?why are we spending money up there when people are starving down here?? > Examples of anti-science shared by both left and right: > > Antivax. Started as a left-wing mania, and still more common in liberal communities, but some of the most prominent advocates are right-wing politicians, e.g. Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin. > Abuse of statistics regarding crime issues, especially gun control. Left- and right-wingers draw opposite conclusions from the same data, and they both go to absurd extremes. Principled statisticians are left crying in the wilderness. > Suspicion of the enterprise of science: the idea that there are giant cabals of scientists working in secret with no oversight and ?playing God? or uncovering ?things we weren?t meant to know.? > Closely related, the common cultural stereotypes of scientists as arrogant, aloof, and out of touch with the lives of ?regular people.? > bill w > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 21:56:11 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:56:11 -0500 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes - I should have said that. bill w On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:04 PM Dan TheBookMan wrote: > From Quora, no? > > Regards, > > Dan > Sample my Kindle books at: > > http://author.to/DanUst > > On Apr 12, 2019, at 12:47 PM, William Flynn Wallace > wrote: > > > Examples of right-wing anti-science: > > 1. Creationism. > 2. Global warming denialism. > 3. Anti-environmentalism generally. > 4. Exaggerated claims about fetal development. > 5. Rejection of epidemiology as it pertains to sex, pregnancy, and > sexually transmitted disease. > 6. Rejection of genetics, neurology, and psychology as they pertain to > sex and gender. > 7. Pseudo-biological justifications for racism and sexism. > 8. Supply-side economics, if you count economics as a science. That?s > a whole ?nother discussion. > > Examples of left-wing anti-science: > > 1. Anti-GMO hysteria. > 2. Opposition to nuclear power under any and all circumstances. > 3. Other extremes of environmentalism, with predictions of immediate > doom rather than slow long-term change. > 4. Opposition to space exploration: ?why are we spending money up > there when people are starving down here?? > > Examples of anti-science shared by both left and right: > > 1. Antivax. Started as a left-wing mania, and still more common in > liberal communities, but some of the most prominent advocates are > right-wing politicians, e.g. Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin. > 2. Abuse of statistics regarding crime issues, especially gun control. > Left- and right-wingers draw opposite conclusions from the same data, and > they both go to absurd extremes. Principled statisticians are left crying > in the wilderness. > 3. Suspicion of the enterprise of science: the idea that there are > giant cabals of scientists working in secret with no oversight and ?playing > God? or uncovering ?things we weren?t meant to know.? > 4. Closely related, the common cultural stereotypes of scientists as > arrogant, aloof, and out of touch with the lives of ?regular people.? > > bill w > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ablainey at aol.com Sat Apr 13 01:40:35 2019 From: ablainey at aol.com (Alex Blainey) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 01:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [ExI] What happened to the good guys? References: <1800799737.2878325.1555119635020.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1800799737.2878325.1555119635020@mail.yahoo.com> Remember when the good guys won at the end of the film? When after the long chase avoiding the minions of the evil shadow puppet masters, Finally the dossier was handed to the press or spread onto the Net. Then the baddies were instantly cuffed, put tin a cell and the key thrown away. When did it change to those who publish the criminals deeds being thrown in the cell and the criminal talking about it on primetime TV, saying how wrong it is that social media allows this kind of thing to happen??? What went wrong? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ablainey at aol.com Sat Apr 13 03:03:25 2019 From: ablainey at aol.com (Alex Blainey) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 03:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [ExI] bad news for T haters References: <251475776.1364455.1555124605447.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <251475776.1364455.1555124605447@mail.yahoo.com> Huh? My own theory is that gravity is both positive and negative and the pull/push felt is simply a Net effect depending on factors of density, mass, charge etc of the atom being influenced. But as for "...empty space contains the dominant energy in the universe" would imply that the void somehow repells everything. ........maybe its some kind of evil twin to nature abores a vacuum. Maybe the vacuum abores nature? In general terms, in the ying yang way the universe works that almost kinda makes, a bit of sense......maybe. A. -----Original Message----- From: William Flynn Wallace To: ExI chat list Sent: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:18 Subject: [ExI] bad news for T haters In a preface to a collection of scifi stories (Hieroglyph), a theoretical physicist, Lawrence Krauss, says, in an apparent reference to T's head..... "...empty space contains the dominant energy in the universe, producing a kind of cosmic antigravity that will determine our ultimate future." btw - just what the hell does that really mean? bill w_______________________________________________ extropy-chat mailing list extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com Sat Apr 13 09:24:22 2019 From: rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com (Rafal Smigrodzki) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 05:24:22 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:52 PM William Flynn Wallace wrote: > > Examples of right-wing anti-science: > > 1. Creationism. > > ### Well, yeah, this is the one real right-wing piece of science denial on this list. > > 1. Global warming denialism. > > ### So say the same leftists who corrupted climate science, expelled independent scientists, silenced opposition, forged data and colluded in hiring activists into positions of power. ------------------ > > 1. Anti-environmentalism generally. > > ### So it's anti-scientific to be a humanist, someone who sees value in humans, and not in the "environment"? ----------------- > > 1. Exaggerated claims about fetal development. > > ### The faithful believe fetuses have souls, they don't make any unusual claims about fetal development. ------------------- > > 1. Rejection of epidemiology as it pertains to sex, pregnancy, and > sexually transmitted disease. > > ### Right wingers claim that homosexuality and promiscuity do not contribute to the risk of STDs, don't they? --------------- > > 1. Rejection of genetics, neurology, and psychology as they pertain to > sex and gender. > > ### No, really? Rejection of the science of gender is one of the most prominent features of modern leftist identity, not right-identity, at least among whites. ----------------- > > 1. Pseudo-biological justifications for racism and sexism. > > ### Really? So the gender and grievance studies departments that fabricate justifications for institutionalized leftist racism (like affirmative action) or sexism (title IX) are in fact staffed by right-wingers? ------------------ > > 1. Supply-side economics, if you count economics as a science. That?s > a whole ?nother discussion. > > ### Because central planning and the 5 year plan are scientific? ---------------------- > Examples of left-wing anti-science: > > 1. Anti-GMO hysteria. > 2. Opposition to nuclear power under any and all circumstances. > 3. Other extremes of environmentalism, with predictions of immediate > doom rather than slow long-term change. > 4. Opposition to space exploration: ?why are we spending money up > there when people are starving down here?? > > ### This is letting leftists off the hook so easily. What about IQ-denialism, race-denialism, opposition to climate engineering, gender-denialism, attacks on STEM and Western science as racist or sexist? It's sad when a piece of leftist propagandizing presents itself as balanced centrism. The Overton window is so far left it fell out of the house. Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Sat Apr 13 11:31:19 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 07:31:19 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 5:30 AM Rafal Smigrodzki wrote: >>Anti-environmentalism generally. > > > ### So it's anti-scientific to be a humanist, someone who sees value in > humans, and not in the "environment"? > All right wingers are clowns on environmental issues and most left wingers are too but there are a few serious people, Stewart Brand comes to mind. >> Exaggerated claims about fetal development. > > > ### The faithful believe fetuses have souls, > Forget fetuses, the faithful believe one celled zygotes have soles and the morning after pill is murder, paradoxically they also believe souls are immortal and and most believe that a soul that has left this life before sinning goes to heaven, although some believe if unbaptised it will be tortured for eternity by an all loving God. I went to a religious grade school and was told it was wrong to kill a person but OK to kill an animal because the person has an immortal soul but the animal didn't; I remember asking why that didn't mean it was more immoral to kill a amamal than a person because unlike the person this life was all the animal had but was hooted down with derision by the class before I got an answer to my question. > Rejection of epidemiology as it pertains to sex, pregnancy, and sexually >> transmitted disease >> > > ### Right wingers claim that homosexuality and promiscuity do not > contribute to the risk of STDs, don't they? > ?*legitimate rape rarely causes pregnancy because the female body has ways of shutting that down*." Republican Senator Todd Akin August 19 2012 >>Supply-side economics, if you count economics as a science. >> > >### Because central planning and the 5 year plan are scientific? > Right wingers ignore the scientific method and the OVERWHELMING evidence that other countries provide much better health care to their citizens than the USA and spend much much less money than the USA when doing so, and continue to believe and, being totally impervious to contrary evidence, will always believe the USA has the best health care system in the world and we can learn absolutely nothing from anybody else about this. In short both sides do the same unscientific thing, they use political ideology to determine what must be true and how to solve social problems and only then go looking for evidence that supports their view while carefully ignoring any evidence that contradicts it. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sat Apr 13 13:37:52 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:37:52 -0500 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Rafal, you are stereotyping, just like the person you are attacking. I am a left/liberal/progressive - moderately so - and I don't believe in any of those things you ascribe to liberals. You are referring to upper East Ivy League school far leftists and I am against them just as much as you are. bill w On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 6:36 AM John Clark wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 5:30 AM Rafal Smigrodzki < > rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com> wrote: > > >>Anti-environmentalism generally. >> >> > > > ### So it's anti-scientific to be a humanist, someone who sees value in >> humans, and not in the "environment"? >> > > All right wingers are clowns on environmental issues and most left wingers > are too but there are a few serious people, Stewart Brand comes to mind. > > > >> Exaggerated claims about fetal development. >> >> > > > ### The faithful believe fetuses have souls, >> > > Forget fetuses, the faithful believe one celled zygotes have soles and the > morning after pill is murder, paradoxically they also believe souls are > immortal and and most believe that a soul that has left this life before > sinning goes to heaven, although some believe if unbaptised it will be > tortured for eternity by an all loving God. > I went to a religious grade school and was told it was wrong to kill a > person but OK to kill an animal because the person has an immortal soul but > the animal didn't; I remember asking why that didn't mean it was more > immoral to kill a amamal than a person because unlike the person this life > was all the animal had but was hooted down with derision by the class > before I got an answer to my question. > > > Rejection of epidemiology as it pertains to sex, pregnancy, and >>> sexually transmitted disease >>> >> > > > ### Right wingers claim that homosexuality and promiscuity do not >> contribute to the risk of STDs, don't they? >> > > ?*legitimate rape rarely causes pregnancy because the female body has > ways of shutting that down*." > Republican Senator Todd Akin August 19 2012 > > >>Supply-side economics, if you count economics as a science. >>> >> > > >### Because central planning and the 5 year plan are scientific? >> > > Right wingers ignore the scientific method and the OVERWHELMING evidence > that other countries provide much better health care to their citizens than > the USA and spend much much less money than the USA when doing so, and > continue to believe and, being totally impervious to contrary evidence, > will always believe the USA has the best health care system in the world > and we can learn absolutely nothing from anybody else about this. > > In short both sides do the same unscientific thing, they use political > ideology to determine what must be true and how to solve social problems > and only then go looking for evidence that supports their view while > carefully ignoring any evidence that contradicts it. > > John K Clark > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Sat Apr 13 18:55:16 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 11:55:16 -0700 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <88CEE5E3-9DC8-422C-99D1-2DC5A369AAB5@gmail.com> On Apr 13, 2019, at 2:24 AM, Rafal Smigrodzki wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:52 PM William Flynn Wallace wrote: > > >> Rejection of genetics, neurology, and psychology as they pertain to sex and gender. > ### No, really? Rejection of the science of gender is one of the most prominent features of modern leftist identity, not right-identity, at least among whites. I?m curious what you mean here by rejecting of the science of gender. Do you rejection of binary gender and of bioessentialism in gender? If so, it seems to me that the science tends to support non-binary gender and also that gender is definitely influenced by things aside from biology (in other words, there?s no uncomplicated path from allosomes to hormones to genitals to gender). See the work of Cordelia Fine, especially her _Delusions of Gender_, and Anne Fausto-Sterling on this. Both of them rely on science to challenge binary gender and the simple model of sex/gender that many adhere to. Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Sat Apr 13 19:31:26 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 12:31:26 -0700 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8EF61C3C-3925-4E65-9D20-8CA1AC9FCD84@gmail.com> On Apr 13, 2019, at 2:24 AM, Rafal Smigrodzki wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:52 PM William Flynn Wallace wrote: >> Exaggerated claims about fetal development. > ### The faithful believe fetuses have souls, they don't make any unusual claims about fetal development. I guess that this is probably meant to cover fetuses feeling pain. The dominant view seems to be that before 24 weeks, fetuses don?t feel pain. Also, I?ve seen pro-life folks make other wrong statements about abortion, including that it causes depression, breast cancer, and fertility. And, sure, it might be true that their core view is there?s a soul in there (starting at conception), but usually anyone making a pro-life case will bring in other stuff since the soul argument isn?t likely to convince people who don?t already believe that. (I?m not going to blame anyone trying to persuade people for bringing in additional arguments provided the additional arguments are valid or don?t fly in the face of evidence. For instance, with myself, I?ll argue in favor of open immigration based on the right of people to peacefully travel and migrate, but I?ll also bring in the economic benefits and the fact that the major arguments for restricting immigration (one?s made both by folks like Bernie Sanders and the current president) are questionable at best.) That said, when Bill W posted this, I took this to mean typical anti-science views held by one part of the spectrum and not that every last person on that part of the spectrum held those views. Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Sun Apr 14 01:30:19 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:30:19 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! Message-ID: <20190413183019.Horde.dh6nIYjP9n13VFSAHIZQmD1@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> John Clark wrote: > It's interesting that because the density of a Black Hole is inversely > proportional to the square of the mass the density of M87's Black Hole is > about that of air. Yes. It was considerations like this that motivated my research into what I called causal cells a couple of years ago. I was on the right track but then I found out that Leonard Susskind already described the same concept only he called them "causal patches" instead of causal cells. In any case, what you describe is a direct consequence of the density and surface area of a black hole or causal cell being inversely proportional i.e. their products are a constant: D*A = 3c^2/(2G) > Well it is if you count the Event Horizon as being the boundary of the thing; Why wouldn't you count it? To an outside observer, it is certainly is the boundary. And no infalling observer will ever be able to disagree with you because the moment he crosses it, (which must be from his point of view) he no longer has the ability to cause events in our causal cell. But from our point of view, he never crosses it. It is a separate discontinuous space-time a different casual cell, with the event horizon as a real boundary. > Einstein says there is a point of infinite density > at the center although Quantum Mechanics disagrees. Nobody knows who's > right. Probably quantum mechanics. My argument is mathematical and goes as follows: Dividing a finite mass by zero volume is not an infinite density, it is a mathematically UNDEFINED density. In other words mass/zero does not equal infinity because infinity*zero cannot equal every possible mass a black hole can have. If a singularity actually exists in the center of a black hole, it should be thought of as a point that is missing from the interior space of the black hole rather than a point that contains all the mass. The mass is instead the vacuum energy of the inside of the black hole and is spread evenly throughout its interior the way dark energy is spread throughout our space-time. This is because time and space axes get swapped when you cross an event horizon so they represent real discontinuities in space-time. The two causal cell separated by event horizons (or cosmological horizons) are causally independent space-times and times and places are exchanged when you cross them. Thus those outside of the black hole conceive of as a location (a point at the center) while those inside would perceive it as a time in the future, e.g. next Tuesday. And it doesn't make sense for next Tuesday to have a mass at all. Even though empty space can in the form of vacuum or dark energy. Stuart LaForge From johnkclark at gmail.com Sun Apr 14 12:05:12 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:05:12 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <20190413183019.Horde.dh6nIYjP9n13VFSAHIZQmD1@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <20190413183019.Horde.dh6nIYjP9n13VFSAHIZQmD1@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 9:36 PM Stuart LaForge wrote: > * >* Einstein says there is a point of infinite density at the center >> although Quantum Mechanics disagrees. Nobody knows who's right. > > > * > Probably quantum mechanics.* That is certainly the conventional approach. People, including Einstein, have been monkeying around with General Relativity for a century trying to make it fit in with Quantum Mechanics and all have failed. And meanwhile unmodified General Relativity has passed with flying colors every experimental test thrown at it even the ones in recent years involving super intense gravitational fields. Maybe it's time to try things from the other direction and leave General Relativity alone and start monkeying around with Quantum Mechanics to make it compatible with General Relativity. * > My argument is mathematical and goes as follows: Dividing a finite mass > by zero volume is not an infinite density, it is a mathematically > UNDEFINED density. * Mathematics is a language, the best language ever found for describing the workings of nature but there is no reason to think it's perfect. Nature is the way it is and doesn't care if humans have defined something or not. And besides, Einstein's theory may produce nonsense at one point (the center of a Black Hole) but Quantum Mechanics produces nonsense at every point, it says every volume in a vacuum has an infinite matter/energy density (or if one makes the assumption unsupported by evidence that spacetime is quantized then not infinite but *only* 10^120 times the density of lead) and thus produces a infinite gravitational field (or a gravitational field 10^120 stronger that what lead can produce). If we could come up with a theory that could describe how everything works everywhere except at the mathematical point at the center of a Black Hole that would be a huge advance. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sparge at gmail.com Sun Apr 14 14:30:26 2019 From: sparge at gmail.com (Dave Sill) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 5:29 AM Rafal Smigrodzki wrote: > ### So it's anti-scientific to be a humanist, someone who sees value in > humans, and not in the "environment"? > Yeah, I'd say it is. We're not at all close to being able to thrive without the environment that formed us and supports us. Maybe we'll be there someday, but until then we should probably try not to ignore our need for our environment. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sun Apr 14 18:19:42 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 13:19:42 -0500 Subject: [ExI] quote Message-ID: >From Sal Khan, in USA Today: "Cats playing piano can now get more attention than political leaders - perhaps deservedly so." Good article on tech bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pharos at gmail.com Sun Apr 14 21:12:27 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:12:27 +0100 Subject: [ExI] Black Hole - How they did it documentary video. Message-ID: BBC TV has a 1 hour video documentary showing how they linked all the telescopes and got the black hole picture. They had a lot of problems over the years to build the system. Worth watching. or If that doesn't work in your country, try - If these don't work try a search for- how-to-see-a-black-hole BillK From foozler83 at gmail.com Sun Apr 14 22:38:45 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:38:45 -0500 Subject: [ExI] free time Message-ID: Where is our time going? Got a request on Quora and Googled the answer. Here it is: https://www.businessinsider.com/no-free-time-adam-alter-2017-5 bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Mon Apr 15 01:03:16 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:03:16 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <395277199.2981659.1555263796209@mail.yahoo.com> References: <20190413183019.Horde.dh6nIYjP9n13VFSAHIZQmD1@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <395277199.2981659.1555263796209@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20190414180316.Horde.zaWGk6bwQl3glLLfEIltBoM@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> John Clark wrote: >> Einstein says there is a point of infinite density at the center >> although Quantum Mechanics disagrees. Nobody knows who's right. > >> Probably quantum mechanics. > > That is certainly the conventional approach. People, including > Einstein, have been monkeying around with General Relativity for a > century trying to make it fit in with Quantum Mechanics and all have > failed. And meanwhile unmodified General Relativity has passed with > flying colors every experimental test thrown at it even the ones in > recent years involving super intense gravitational fields. Maybe > it's time to try things from the other direction and leave General > Relativity alone and start monkeying around with Quantum Mechanics > to make it compatible with General Relativity. Ok, so let's assume that the GR singularity is a literal point mass and lets forget about density for a minute. Let's model its position as a Dirac delta function. Since it is at an exact location in space that Einstein gives us, our uncertainty in the singularity's position is minimized. However, Heisenberg says this should result in us having maximum uncertainty of the singularity's momentum, that is to say its mass, trajectory, and speed. It could be headed away from us or toward us and we wouldn't know until it was too late. The most massive things in the universe can also be the sneakiest, how's that for irony? Another way to think about it is that the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta function (i.e. position) in the time domain to the frequency domain yields a single frequency sine wave as the momentum probability amplitude which means that it could have any number of possible momenta with equal probability and we have no way of knowing which momentum it actuality has. I will leave it up to you whether you allow Heisenberg to divide by zero the way you allowed Einstein to. But the problem is that all black holes and causal cells are finite in size regardless of the size of the universe as a whole. That is to say that even if the universe is infinite, our patch of causally-connected space-time is not. Therefore nothing we can measure should ever be allowed to be infinite in our calculations. >> My argument is mathematical and goes as follows: Dividing a finite >> mass by zero volume is not an infinite density, it? is a >> mathematically UNDEFINED density. > > Mathematics is a language, the best language ever found for > describing the workings of nature but there is no reason to think > it's perfect. Nature is the way it is and doesn't care if humans > have defined something or not. This is precisely why I pay more attention to the measured value of dark energy than the nonsense the quantum field theorists calculated using infinity in their calculations. > And besides, Einstein's theory may produce nonsense at one point > (the center of a Black Hole) but Quantum Mechanics produces nonsense > at every point, it says every volume in a vacuum has an infinite > matter/energy density (or if one makes the assumption unsupported by > evidence that spacetime is quantized then?not infinite but *only* > 10^120 times the density of lead) and thus produces a infinite > gravitational field (or a gravitational?field 10^120 stronger that > what lead can produce). The whole problem rests on the fact that we let quantum field theorists use infinity instead of forcing them to use discrete math with finite boundary conditions for what is by definition a discrete phenomenon. You can't let the wave functions of quantum harmonic oscillators or particles or anything else take on infinite values because our causal cell is not infinite in extent nor is the observable universe. Allow me to demonstrate how to "fix" the quantum vacuum energy calculation. First we treat the entire causal cell as a large but not infinite collection of quantum oscillators that can assume many different vibrational modes but NOT an infinite number of vibrational modes since our causal cell is finite in both space and time. That is to say that our causal cell is 13.8 billion years old. That is approximately Tu = 4.45*10^17 seconds old. So we set the fundamental frequency as Fmin = 1/Tu or 2.30*10^-18 Hertz. The intuition here is that the lowest possible frequency oscillator that can possibly be measured is one that has only vibrated half-way since the beginning of time, i.e. the Big Bang. Similarly there is a maximum frequency to a quantum oscillator within our causal and that Now according to QM, the equation for the nth energy state of the quantum harmonic oscillator is E(n) = (h*Fmin/2)(n+1/2) with n=0 being the ground state and n only taking integer values. h is Planck's constant and F is the frequency as usual. The next step is to realize that the only possible frequencies that the quantum harmonic oscillators can vibrate at are whole number multiples of the fundamental frequency. This is the whole meaning of the term "harmonic". That is to say that the number of possible frequencies are finite and bounded both from above as well as below. In other words, there is a maximum frequency that a quantum oscillator can vibrate at and that is the Planck frequency or one cycle per Planck time or Fmax = 1/Tp = 1.85*10^43 Hertz. That means that the highest harmonic of the fundamental frequency that a quantum oscillator can attain is n_max = Fmax/Fmin = 8.08*10^60. Now to figure out what the vacuum energy of our causal cell is requires one final assumption which is that no two quantum harmonic oscillators in our causal cell can vibrate with the exact same frequency or have the same value of "n". Now we can calculate the total vacuum energy of our causal cell as E_vac = E(0) + E(1) + E(2) + . . . + E(n_max) = (h*Fmin/2)*(n_max+1)^2 = 2.48*10^70 Joules or dividing by c^2 gives 2.76*10^53 kilograms. This is pretty darn close to current estimates of the mass of the observable universe, which makes sense as since the mass of the universe is dominated by dark energy s you can see here: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-mass-of-the-universe?redirected_qid=21252687 And all I used were the observed age of the universe, the Planck time, and the equation for the quantum harmonic oscillator. Stuart LaForge From rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 00:04:13 2019 From: rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com (Rafal Smigrodzki) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:04:13 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 9:42 AM William Flynn Wallace wrote: > Rafal, you are stereotyping, just like the person you are attacking. I am > a left/liberal/progressive - moderately so - and I don't believe in any of > those things you ascribe to liberals. You are referring to upper East Ivy > League school far leftists and I am against them just as much as you are. > > ### I am not attacking anybody, just observing that the listicle was written by a leftist with only minor quibbles with the typical leftist dogma. Why pay attention to it then? It doesn't help to quote low quality materials on the list. Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 00:28:55 2019 From: rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com (Rafal Smigrodzki) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:28:55 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: <88CEE5E3-9DC8-422C-99D1-2DC5A369AAB5@gmail.com> References: <88CEE5E3-9DC8-422C-99D1-2DC5A369AAB5@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 2:55 PM Dan TheBookMan wrote: > On Apr 13, 2019, at 2:24 AM, Rafal Smigrodzki > wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:52 PM William Flynn Wallace > wrote: > > >> >> 1. Rejection of genetics, neurology, and psychology as they pertain >> to sex and gender. >> >> ### No, really? Rejection of the science of gender is one of the most > prominent features of modern leftist identity, not right-identity, at least > among whites. > > > I?m curious what you mean here by rejecting of the science of gender. Do > you rejection of binary gender and of bioessentialism in gender? If so, it > seems to me that the science tends to support non-binary gender and also > that gender is definitely influenced by things aside from biology (in other > words, there?s no uncomplicated path from allosomes to hormones to genitals > to gender). See the work of Cordelia Fine, especially her _Delusions of > Gender_, and Anne Fausto-Sterling on this. Both of them rely on science to > challenge binary gender and the simple model of sex/gender that many adhere > to. > ### Gender is of course a biological trait, with culturally modified manifestations. As any complex biological trait gender is not "binary", since thousands of moving parts don't neatly partition into two sets - there are always millions of ways for a mechanism to go wrong and produce all kinds of more or less bizarre versions. What today's extreme leftists do is they deny the importance of the biological underpinnings of gender and they claim that a person's expressed preference to be included in some gender category is sufficient for inclusion, regardless of other measurables. They also deny the normative distinction between healthy, adaptive genders, of which there are two, and the diverse gradations of deviancy. So, they say that a psychologically disturbed man or a malingering man may claim himself to be a woman and we, normal people, are obliged to respect his claims. Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 00:38:40 2019 From: rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com (Rafal Smigrodzki) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:38:40 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:30 AM Dave Sill wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 5:29 AM Rafal Smigrodzki < > rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com> wrote: > >> ### So it's anti-scientific to be a humanist, someone who sees value in >> humans, and not in the "environment"? >> > > Yeah, I'd say it is. We're not at all close to being able to thrive > without the environment that formed us and supports us. Maybe we'll be > there someday, but until then we should probably try not to ignore our need > for our environment. > > ### Wait, what is it that you are actually saying: 1. It is anti-scientific to be a humanist 2. It is anti-scientific to not be an environmentalist (i.e. somebody who ascribes moral subjectship to a collection of non-human entities, including inanimate, plant and animal ones) 3. For a humanist it is advisable to pay attention to the environment in order to avoid harming humans All of the above? Only #3? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 01:27:45 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:27:45 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:10 PM Rafal Smigrodzki wrote: >### I am not attacking anybody, just observing that the listicle was > written by a leftist > In politics do the terms "left"and "right" still mean anything?. At one time the right stood for people who thought the budget deficit was super important but now they think it is of no importance whatsoever. And the left said you could put any drug you want into your body, but no longer. The right once though government had no right to pass laws preventing free trade, but now the right is full of self described "tariff men". The left says there is no greater problem than global warming but despite nuclear power's excellent safety record and its zero emission of greenhouse gasses will shout down anyone who even tries to consider it. In the past the left was as absolute in its support of the first amendment as the right is of the second, but that is no longer true. And the left, for some bizarre reason I don't pretend to understand now opposes vaccines, an invention that has saved more lives than any other. About the only thing that hasn't changes is the right still opposes Evolution, they still hear a invisible man is the sky telling then what to do, and they still believe that life begins at erection. So I don't know if I'm a leftist or a rightest, but I do know I'm not a moderate. John K Clark . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 02:28:49 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 22:28:49 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <20190414180316.Horde.zaWGk6bwQl3glLLfEIltBoM@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <20190413183019.Horde.dh6nIYjP9n13VFSAHIZQmD1@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <395277199.2981659.1555263796209@mail.yahoo.com> <20190414180316.Horde.zaWGk6bwQl3glLLfEIltBoM@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 9:09 PM Stuart LaForge wrote: > > *> I will leave it up to you whether you allow Heisenberg to divide by > zero the way you allowed Einstein to.* General Relativity only divides by zero at the center of a Black Hole and I'm sure even Einstein would agree that his theory breaks down at that point, but at every other point it either makes correct predictions or it remains silent and makes no prediction at all, at no other point does it make absurd predictions as Quantum Mechanics does when it attempts to calculate the mass/energy density of the vacuum. > > > *The whole problem rests on the fact that we let quantum field theorists > use infinity* We let them because it works, at least for electromagnetism. In a vacuum the average value of a electric field is zero if you add up all the plus and minus values, but the energy density is proportional to the field squared and that is infinite. But Feynman with his re-normalization found that the absolute value of the energy density doesn't matter and only the changes in it are important. Feynman admitted that a mathematician might not approve of how he did it but nature did approve because it allow him to make predictions that agreed with experiment to better than one part in a trillion. But his method won't work with gravity because it does depend on the absolute value of the energy density. > > *> You can't let the wave functions of quantum harmonic oscillators or > particles or anything else take on infinite values * > You can if the thing has both positive and negative infinities and you can get them to cancel out as Feynman did. People thought that with supersymmetry the positive and negative infinities would cancel out and the mass/energy density would turn out to be exactly zero, and then we'd be well on our way to having a quantum theory of gravity. But then just as we thought we were making real progress 2 ENORMOUS problems showed up: 1) Supersymmetric particles don't seem to exist, the LHC hasn't seen even a hint of them and it should have. 2) We know know from the observation of a accelerating universe that the mass/energy density is not infinite or 10^120 or zero, it is instead a very very small finite number. So now we have to find a way to cancel out everything EXCEPT for one part in 10^120, a vastly more difficult task than just canceling everything out. >* So we set the fundamental frequency as Fmin = 1/Tu or 2.30*10^-18 Hertz. > The intuition here is that the lowest possible frequency oscillator that > can possibly be measured is one that has only vibrated half-way since the > beginning of time, i.e. the Big Bang.* A electromagnetic wave with a frequency that low would contain such a absurdly small amount of mass/energy it's not worth considering. > > there is a maximum frequency that a quantum oscillator can vibrate at That would be true only if spacetime was not continuous, and there is no experimental evidence for that. > > > > > *Now to figure out what the vacuum energy of our causal cell is requires > one final assumption which is that no two quantum harmonic oscillators in > our causal cell can vibrate with the exact same frequency or have the same > value of "n".* > That's true for Fermions like electrons protons and neutrons but not for Bosons like photons of light; any number of photons can be in the same quantum state. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 16 03:51:22 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:51:22 -0700 Subject: [ExI] auto-braking Message-ID: <028b01d4f407$a8e86d20$fab94760$@rainier66.com> My neighbor bought one of those cars which is supposed to automatically hit the brakes to prevent hitting the car in front, but he is afraid to test it. I inquired about the wisdom of buying such a system if one does not test it to see if it works. He agreed he would like to know, but is unwilling to risk his life or allow anyone else to risk theirs to test it. It occurred to me this is our chance to make a buttload of money. We could get some big foam-rubber blocks, perhaps 50 x 30 x 30 cm, stack them to make a "brick wall" which will not hurt the car or the driver if the computer decides to drive through, or misjudges the distance or any other thing. We could set up a hose, test the car, wet the pavement, repeat. Anyone here have one of those cars? Have you tested it? We could let proles race towards that foam block wall, test their cars for 50 bucks. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stathisp at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 04:17:06 2019 From: stathisp at gmail.com (Stathis Papaioannou) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:17:06 +1000 Subject: [ExI] auto-braking In-Reply-To: <028b01d4f407$a8e86d20$fab94760$@rainier66.com> References: <028b01d4f407$a8e86d20$fab94760$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 13:54, Spike Jones wrote: > > > > > My neighbor bought one of those cars which is supposed to automatically > hit the brakes to prevent hitting the car in front, but he is afraid to > test it. I inquired about the wisdom of buying such a system if one does > not test it to see if it works. He agreed he would like to know, but is > unwilling to risk his life or allow anyone else to risk theirs to test it. > > > > It occurred to me this is our chance to make a buttload of money. We > could get some big foam-rubber blocks, perhaps 50 x 30 x 30 cm, stack them > to make a ?brick wall? which will not hurt the car or the driver if the > computer decides to drive through, or misjudges the distance or any other > thing. > > > > We could set up a hose, test the car, wet the pavement, repeat. > > > > Anyone here have one of those cars? Have you tested it? > > > > We could let proles race towards that foam block wall, test their cars for > 50 bucks. > Big empty cardboard boxes are probably easier to come by than foam blocks. My car puts on the brakes if you approach a wall too fast when parking. -- Stathis Papaioannou Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 16 04:39:26 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:39:26 -0700 Subject: [ExI] auto-braking In-Reply-To: References: <028b01d4f407$a8e86d20$fab94760$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <02b201d4f40e$60234270$2069c750$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Stathis Papaioannou Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 9:17 PM To: ExI chat list Subject: Re: [ExI] auto-braking On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 13:54, Spike Jones > wrote: ? Anyone here have one of those cars? Have you tested it? We could let proles race towards that foam block wall, test their cars for 50 bucks. >?Big empty cardboard boxes are probably easier to come by than foam blocks. My car puts on the brakes if you approach a wall too fast when parking. -- Stathis Papaioannou Good point. We could use the lightweight boxes, which don?t cost much. The foam blocks might hold up better, but if the systems work (one must assume they do) then the paper boxes might be a better way to go. One might assume the manufacturer would not be selling these things if they don?t work. I thought of something else. If one has driven in the American desert, one has likely seen tumbleweeds blow across the road in one?s path. If one is driving at night, encounters with the wretched flora is inevitable. These can be huge, two or even three meters in diameter, but there is nothing to them. They are kinda fun to hit at high speed: they explode in a most satisfying manner. Now I am wondering: would those auto-braking systems see right thru a tumbleweed, or would it try to stop? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 06:40:31 2019 From: rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com (Rafal Smigrodzki) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:40:31 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:28 PM John Clark wrote: > > So I don't know if I'm a leftist or a rightest, but I do know I'm not a > moderate. > > ### I am pretty sure I am neither leftist nor rightist nor moderate, which on this list should be par for the course. But, I must say that leftists anger me more nowadays because they have all the power and they can harm me, while right wingers are has-beens as far as power goes, so they don't bother me anymore. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From atymes at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 07:05:42 2019 From: atymes at gmail.com (Adrian Tymes) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:05:42 -0700 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:45 PM Rafal Smigrodzki < rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com> wrote: > > But, I must say that leftists anger me more nowadays because they have all > the power and they can harm me, while right wingers are has-beens as far as > power goes, so they don't bother me anymore. > You mean, in spite of right wingers controlling the US Senate and occupying the White House? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sparge at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 12:34:37 2019 From: sparge at gmail.com (Dave Sill) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:34:37 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:45 PM Rafal Smigrodzki wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:30 AM Dave Sill wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 5:29 AM Rafal Smigrodzki < >> rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> ### So it's anti-scientific to be a humanist, someone who sees value in >>> humans, and not in the "environment"? >>> >> >> Yeah, I'd say it is. We're not at all close to being able to thrive >> without the environment that formed us and supports us. Maybe we'll be >> there someday, but until then we should probably try not to ignore our need >> for our environment. >> >> ### Wait, what is it that you are actually saying: > > 1. It is anti-scientific to be a humanist > 2. It is anti-scientific to not be an environmentalist (i.e. somebody who > ascribes moral subjectship to a collection of non-human entities, including > inanimate, plant and animal ones) > 3. For a humanist it is advisable to pay attention to the environment in > order to avoid harming humans > > All of the above? Only #3? > I'm saying it's anti-scientific to value humans but not the environment they need in order to thrive. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 12:43:33 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:43:33 -0400 Subject: [ExI] antiscience from both sides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:48 AM Rafal Smigrodzki wrote: > ### *I am pretty sure I am neither leftist nor rightist nor moderate, > which on this list should be par for the course.* > Today, at least in the USA, "right" and "left" are just tribal labels that have little to do with ideas and only one thing keeps the tribes together, the right are in blind love with Donald Trump while the left are appalled by his dishonesty and willful ignorance of facts. That's why Trump's approval ratings stay put at about 40% regardless of what happens in the world around him or what he does or doesn't do. > *But, I must say that leftists anger me more nowadays because they have > all the power and they can harm me* The right terrifies me more nowadays because an H-bomb can harm me and only they have the keys to a nuclear submarine. And the right has the power, and I think the will, to put tanks in the streets the day after the 2020 election if things don't turn out the way they like. I know some will say I'm being paranoid and I really hope they turn out to have been right. > > *while right wingers are has-beens as far as power goes,* > It is a metaphysical certitude that those who claim the acceleration of the wealth gap between the top 0.01% and everybody else can continue forever just as it has for the last few years and believe measures should be taken to accelerate the acceleration (as with recent tax legislation) will loose. It's only a matter of time. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Tue Apr 16 23:55:30 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:55:30 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <792315285.90742.1555382891127@mail.yahoo.com> References: <20190413183019.Horde.dh6nIYjP9n13VFSAHIZQmD1@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <395277199.2981659.1555263796209@mail.yahoo.com> <20190414180316.Horde.zaWGk6bwQl3glLLfEIltBoM@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <792315285.90742.1555382891127@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20190416165530.Horde.CyXdBlsXe5M0u4jR9hBYNCQ@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> John Clark wrote: >> I will leave it up to you whether you allow Heisenberg to divide by? > zero the way you allowed Einstein to. > > General Relativity only divides by zero at the center of a Black > Hole and I'm sure even Einstein would agree that his theory breaks > down at that point, but at every other point it either makes correct > predictions or it remains silent and makes no prediction at all, at > no other point does it make absurd predictions as Quantum Mechanics > does when it attempts to calculate the mass/energy density of the > vacuum.?? I think too much "shut up and calculate" Copenhagen indoctrination has caused generations of physicists to learn the math of QM without trying to understand its significance. Itis ultimately about waves and waves have certain behaviors. Harmonics being among them. >> The whole problem rests on the fact that we let quantum field? > theorists use infinity > > We let them because it works, at least for electromagnetism. In a > vacuum the average value of a electric field is zero if you add up > all the plus and minus values, but the energy density is > proportional to the field squared and that is infinite. But Feynman > with his re-normalization found that the absolute value of the > energy density doesn't matter and only the changes in it are > important. Feynman admitted that a ?mathematician might not approve > of how he did it but nature did approve because it allow him to make > predictions that agreed with experiment to better than one part in a > trillion. But his method won't work with gravity because it does > depend on the?absolute value of the energy density. Ok. So maybe an infinite number of quantum oscillators destructively interfere with each other except for the first 10^60 harmonics of the fundamental frequency. My result stands. You want me to bring in unnecessary infinities just to show you that they cancel out? >> You can't let the wave functions of quantum harmonic? > oscillators or particles or anything else take on infinite values? > > You can if the thing has both positive and ?negative infinities and > you can get them to cancel out as Feynman did.? People thought that > with supersymmetry? the positive and negative infinities would > cancel out and the mass/energy density would turn out to be exactly > zero, and then we'd be well on our way to having a quantum theory of > gravity. But then just as we thought we were making real progress 2 > ENORMOUS problems showed up: > 1) Supersymmetric particles don't seem to exist, the LHC hasn't seen > even a hint of them and it should have. > 2) We know know from the observation of a accelerating universe that > the mass/energy density is not infinite or 10^120 or? zero, it is > instead a very very small finite number. So now we have to find a > way to cancel out everything EXCEPT? for one part in 10^120, a > vastly more difficult task than just canceling everything out. Dark Energy doesn't cancel out because it is in resonance with the big bang. That would be my guess. After all vacuum energy is caused by quantum fluctuations which is also what purportedly caused the big bang. >> So we set the fundamental frequency as Fmin = 1/Tu or 2.30*10^-18 >> Hertz. The intuition here is that the lowest possible frequency >> oscillator that can possibly be ?measured is one that has only >> vibrated half-way since the beginning of ?time, i.e. the Big Bang. > > A electromagnetic wave with a ?frequency that low would contain > such?a absurdly small amount of mass/energy it's not worth > considering. I never claimed dark energy was electromagnetic in nature. All I claimed was that dark energy was the sum of the fundamental frequency of the universe and its harmonic overtones. Think of Fmin as the frequency of occurrence of big bangs (which will change the older the universe gets without another big bang) and Fmax the frequency of the energy released from the big bang. Every other frequency we measure must logically fall within those bounds. >> there is a maximum frequency that a quantum oscillator? can vibrate at > That would be true only if spacetime was not continuous, and there > is no experimental evidence for that. ? ?? Not necessarily. I can't rule out discrete space-time but a maximum frequency cutoff can exist even if space-time is continuous. Consider this: The shorter the wavelength of a wave, the higher the frequency. The higher the frequency of a wave, the higher the energy of the wave. The higher the energy of a wave, the more it bends its surrounding space-time. If the frequency exceeds 5.23*10^42 Hertz, then the wavelength is shorter than the Schwarzschild radius of the wave which means that you get a tiny black hole and the wave can't propagate anywhere because it is stuck. This is called either a kugelblitz or a geon. Of course such a micro-sized black hole should be very unstable and instantly evaporate into Hawking radiation but chances are it would decay into lower energy particles with a lower frequency. Nonetheless kugelblitzes and geons do suggest that that there is a maximum frequency at which a wave can propagate. Curiously, if I use the kugelblitz frequency instead of the Planck frequency as the Fmax in my harmonic oscillator calculations, I get a mass of 8.79*10^52 kilograms for the vacuum energy. Which puts the mass of ordinary matter in the observable universe listed by wikipedia as 4.5*10^51 kilograms at 4.87% of the mass of the universe. 4.5*10^51/(8.79*10^52 + 4.5*10^51) = .0487 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe I don't understand how my calculations could be a mere coincidence when there are 122 orders of magnitude at play and I am off by a mere 3/100th of 1 percent from observed experimental results. >> Now to figure out what the vacuum energy of our causal cell is? > requires one final assumption which is that no two quantum harmonic? > oscillators in our causal cell can vibrate with the exact same? > frequency or have the same value of "n". > > > That's true for Fermions like electrons protons and neutrons but not > for Bosons like photons of light; any number of photons can be in > the same quantum state. Well if dark energy were made of photons of light, then it probably wouldn't be so mysterious. Perhaps this is evidence that gravitons are fermions. Stuart LaForge From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 02:16:27 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:16:27 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Bill Weld Message-ID: Bill Weld was the 2016 vice presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party and has announced he will challenge Donald Trump for the Republican nomination. https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/15/politics/bill-weld-2020-trump/index.html John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From atymes at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 04:32:18 2019 From: atymes at gmail.com (Adrian Tymes) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:32:18 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Bill Weld In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Is there a snowball's chance of him getting the California Republican primary votes? If so, with California no longer being at the end of the primaries, might that translate into enough support to dump Trump from the nomination? On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:26 PM John Clark wrote: > Bill Weld was the 2016 vice presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party > and has announced he will challenge Donald Trump for the > Republican nomination. > > https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/15/politics/bill-weld-2020-trump/index.html > > John K Clark > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 13:50:07 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:50:07 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Bill Weld In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:38 AM Adrian Tymes wrote: > *> Is there a snowball's chance of him getting the California Republican > primary votes?* > Probably not, but even so this is good news. Incumbent presadent Lyndon Johnson was challenged for the Democratic nomination in 1968 by Eugene Mccarthy, Gerald Ford was challenged for the Republican nomination in 1976 by Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter was challenged for the Democratic nomination in 1980 by Edward Kennedy, George H W Bush was challenged for the Republican nomination in 1992 by Pat Buchanan. In each case the challenger failed however the incumbent presadent was so weakened in the fight he failed to win a second term in the general election. Of course in this case whether Trump's failure to win the general election means he won't be Commander In Chief for another 4 years, or for the rest of his life, is another question entirely. At any rate I applaud Weld for making this effort, perhaps he is trying to make amends for the colossal damage he caused to the country and to the world in 2016. If the Libertarian Party has one ounce of remaining integrity (which I doubt) then they will not nominate anybody for presadent but will instead aim all their support toward Weld. And every libertarian in California (both small l and large) should immediately change their voter affiliation to Republican so they can vote in the primary. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From atymes at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 16:06:04 2019 From: atymes at gmail.com (Adrian Tymes) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:06:04 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Bill Weld In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:59 AM John Clark wrote: > If the Libertarian Party has one ounce of remaining integrity (which I > doubt) then they will not nominate anybody for presadent but will instead > aim all their support toward Weld. > Assuming Weld loses, as is likely, what would be the damage if the LP both nominated someone and supported Weld? The LP's nomination would presumably happen well after the Republican primaries, so these would be two separate contests. And, the LP seems likely to draw off far more Republicans who don't like Trump but refuse to vote Democratic, than all other groups of voters combined - so if anything, they would deprive Trump of Electoral College votes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 17:20:41 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:20:41 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <20190416165530.Horde.CyXdBlsXe5M0u4jR9hBYNCQ@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <20190413183019.Horde.dh6nIYjP9n13VFSAHIZQmD1@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <395277199.2981659.1555263796209@mail.yahoo.com> <20190414180316.Horde.zaWGk6bwQl3glLLfEIltBoM@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <792315285.90742.1555382891127@mail.yahoo.com> <20190416165530.Horde.CyXdBlsXe5M0u4jR9hBYNCQ@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 8:43 PM Stuart LaForge wrote: >>A electromagnetic wave with a frequency that low would contain such a >> absurdly small amount of mass/energy it's not worth considering. > > *> I never claimed dark energy was electromagnetic in nature.* With any sort of wave the longer the wavelength the less energy it contains, and you're talking about a wave almost as large as the observable universe. * > Dark Energy doesn't cancel out because it is in resonance with the > big bang. That would be my guess. * It would be easy to understand if Dark Energy didn't cancel out and only a little harder to understand if it didn't, but trying to figure out why everything cancels out EXCEPT for one part in 10^120 is ridiculously hard. > >*I never claimed dark energy was electromagnetic in nature.* The mystery is not that Dark Energy exists but that it's so weak. It's been known for many years that electromagnetism should cause Dark Energy but the calculated strength is so huge the universe would accelerate so fast that a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang no proton would be closer than a billion light years from another proton. Needless to say that's not the universe we live in, it's been called the worse disagreement between theory and observation in the entire history of science. > > > > > > > * > a maximum frequency cutoff can exist even if space-time is > continuous. Consider this: The shorter the wavelength of a wave, the > higher the frequency. The higher the frequency of a wave, the higher the > energy of the wave. The higher the energy of a wave, the more it bends its > surrounding space-time. If the frequency exceeds 5.23*10^42 Hertz, then > the wavelength is shorter than the Schwarzschild radius of the wave which > means that you get a tiny black hole and the wave can't propagate * *anywhere because it is stuck. This is called either a kugelblitz * If spacetime is continuous then there there is always a discernible different between 2 points regardless of how close together they are, but if a kugelblitz always forms when you pack enough energy into a small enough volume then there can't be a detectable difference between the 2 points and it would be meaningless to say spacetime is continuous. And a kugelblitz can't form unless both Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity always work the way current textbooks say they do, and everybody agrees that at the center of a Black Hole at least one of those theories and probably both breaks down. >>> >>> *>>>one final assumption which is that no two quantum >>> harmonic oscillators in our causal cell can vibrate with the exact >>> same frequency or have the same value of "n".* >> >> >> >> That's true for Fermions like electrons protons and neutrons but not >> for Bosons like photons of light; any number of photons can be in >> the same quantum state. > > > *>* > *Well if dark energy were made of photons of light, then it probably > wouldn't be so mysterious. * If you assume spacetime is continuous then Dark Energy should be infinitely strong. If we assume nothing can be smaller than the Planck Time or the Planck Length things are a little better but not much, then Dark Energy is not infinite but it would still cause the universe to accelerate 10^120 faster than what we observe. So something is obviously very very wrong but nobody knows what. > *> Perhaps this is evidence that gravitons are fermions.* > Nobody has ever detected a graviton it's a purely theoretical construct but if it exists it must have a spin of 2, and by definition bosons are particles with integer spin and thus the graviton must be a Boson just like all the other force carrying particles and be unaffected by the Pauli Exclusion Principle so an infinite number of them can be in the same quantum state. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sen.otaku at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 19:12:29 2019 From: sen.otaku at gmail.com (SR Ballard) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:12:29 -0500 Subject: [ExI] Brain Death "paused" In-Reply-To: <001a01d4e992$b58498d0$208dca70$@rainier66.com> References: <001a01d4e992$b58498d0$208dca70$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: NatGeo has come out with an interesting article : https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/04/pig-brains-partially-revived-what-it-means-for-medicine-death-ethics/ "Scientists have restored cellular function in 32 pig brains that had been dead for hours, opening up a new avenue in treating brain disease" "Announced on Wednesday in the journal *Nature*, researchers at the Yale University School of Medicine devised a system roughly analogous to a dialysis machine, called BrainEx, that restores circulation and oxygen flow to a dead brain." "And technically, the pig brains remained dead?by design, the treated brains did not show any signs of the organized electrical neural activity required for awareness or consciousness. " Nature Article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1099-1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Wed Apr 17 20:45:02 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:45:02 -0700 Subject: [ExI] lc0 wins tournament Message-ID: <006301d4f55e$6f9b59d0$4ed20d70$@rainier66.com> This article is claiming that LeelaChess 0 taught itself to play chess using online games and has won a major computer chess championship: https://www.chess.com/news/view/lc0-wins-computer-chess-championship-makes-h istory The whole concept reminds me of a notion we used to kick around about 20 yrs ago here: an AI emerges, goes into internet archives and learns about its new subjects by reading our internet posts. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 22:54:53 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:54:53 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Bill Weld In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:12 PM Adrian Tymes wrote: *> Assuming Weld loses, as is likely, what would be the damage if the LP > both nominated someone and supported Weld? * > If the Libertarian Party is really sincere when they wax poetic about the value of libertarian ideas then their number one priority should be preventing the most anti-libertarian president in American history from winning another general election. And, because there is only one person who has a realistic chance of stopping Trump, that means supporting *ANY FUNCTIONAL ADULT* the Democrats nominate and doing so with enthusiasm. Its the least they can do after their disgraceful 2016 performance. > *> The LP's nomination would presumably happen well after the Republican > primaries, so these would be two separate contests. And, the LP seems > likely to draw off far more Republicans who don't like Trump but refuse to > vote Democratic,* > If we lived in a rational world there might be some truth in that, but we don't. It's hard to imagine 2 more different politicians than Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders and yet 12% of the many millions of Sanders fans voted for Trump in the general election, 5% did not vote at all and 10% did the equivalent by voting for a third party nonentity. I think that a substantial minority of voters want a candidate who has no chance of winning, they hate Trump and fool themselves into thinking a vote for Joe Nobody is a vote against him and, because they know he can't win, they don't have to take responsibility for actions taken by somebody who might actually win. Currently there are about 20 people trying to get the Democratic nomination and 19 of them will fail, its inevitable that some fans of those 19 are going to have hard feelings against the winner, most intensely hate Trump so they won't vote for him but if they don't think it through they might vote for Joe Nobody the Bozo Party candidate. > *> than all other groups of voters combined - so if anything, they would > deprive Trump of Electoral College votes.* > Although they will receive millions of popular votes I would bet money that in 2020 third parties will get ten times as many electoral votes as they did in 2016, and if I've performed the multiplication correctly that works out to be precisely zero. John K Clark > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From atymes at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 23:30:08 2019 From: atymes at gmail.com (Adrian Tymes) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:30:08 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Bill Weld In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All that, and you missed the question that I actually asked. By the time the LP can nominate someone, either Bill Weld will be out of the running in which case the LP's nomination has no bearing on support of Weld or lack thereof, or (somehow) he will have defeated Trump for the Republican nomination in which case the LP's further impact on the election is moot so far as defeating Trump goes. (If the latter happens and Trump does go martial law, the LP's further actions become irrelevant to the matter of removing Trump from office.) Thus, there seems to be no case in which the LP not nominating anyone would help Weld defeat Trump. However, you requested the LP not nominate anyone and instead support Weld. There does not seem to be any chain of events by which these are mutually exclusive: first Weld gets defeated or not, with the LP's support or not, and then the LP's nomination happens. That being the case, how would the LP not nominating anyone help Weld? On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:59 PM John Clark wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:12 PM Adrian Tymes wrote: > > *> Assuming Weld loses, as is likely, what would be the damage if the LP >> both nominated someone and supported Weld? * >> > > If the Libertarian Party is really sincere when they wax poetic about the > value of libertarian ideas then their number one priority should be > preventing the most anti-libertarian president in American history from > winning another general election. And, because there is only one person who > has a realistic chance of stopping Trump, that means supporting *ANY > FUNCTIONAL ADULT* the Democrats nominate and doing so with enthusiasm. > Its the least they can do after their disgraceful 2016 performance. > > >> *> The LP's nomination would presumably happen well after the Republican >> primaries, so these would be two separate contests. And, the LP seems >> likely to draw off far more Republicans who don't like Trump but refuse to >> vote Democratic,* >> > > If we lived in a rational world there might be some truth in that, but we > don't. It's hard to imagine 2 more different politicians than Donald Trump > and Bernie Sanders and yet 12% of the many millions of Sanders fans voted > for Trump in the general election, 5% did not vote at all and 10% did the > equivalent by voting for a third party nonentity. > > I think that a substantial minority of voters want a candidate who has no > chance of winning, they hate Trump and fool themselves into thinking a vote > for Joe Nobody is a vote against him and, because they know he can't win, > they don't have to take responsibility for actions taken by somebody who > might actually win. > > Currently there are about 20 people trying to get the Democratic > nomination and 19 of them will fail, its inevitable that some fans of > those 19 are going to have hard feelings against the winner, most intensely > hate Trump so they won't vote for him but if they don't think it through > they might vote for Joe Nobody the Bozo Party candidate. > > >> *> than all other groups of voters combined - so if anything, they would >> deprive Trump of Electoral College votes.* >> > > Although they will receive millions of popular votes I would bet money > that in 2020 third parties will get ten times as many electoral votes as > they did in 2016, and if I've performed the multiplication correctly that > works out to be precisely zero. > > John K Clark > > > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 00:43:58 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:43:58 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Bill Weld In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:35 PM Adrian Tymes wrote: > > there seems to be no case in which the LP not nominating anyone would > help Weld defeat Trump. However, you requested the LP not nominate anyone > and instead support Weld. > I also said that after the 2016 debacle, which couldn't have happened without them, the LP supporting any functional adult the Democrats nominate and doing so with enthusiasm is the least they could do. If they had supported Clinton in 2016 she would probably have won and in 2020 they could have nominated a candidate who had a real chance of winning, I'd vote for the guy myself and I said that on this very list at the time. But it's all ashes now and I will never vote Libertarian again or, it goes without saying, Republican. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 12:39:10 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:39:10 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Brain Death "paused" In-Reply-To: References: <001a01d4e992$b58498d0$208dca70$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:18 PM SR Ballard wrote: > NatGeo has come out with an interesting article : > > https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/04/pig-brains-partially-revived-what-it-means-for-medicine-death-ethics/ > "Scientists have restored cellular function in 32 pig brains that had been > dead for hours, opening up a new avenue in treating brain disease" > The scientists involved said they were worried about the brain becoming conscious 4 hours after the pigs were killed in a slaughterhouse, so in the solution they pumped through the brain that provided oxygen sugars and other nutrients they included a drug that inhibits organized 3D brain activity. And they employed a bioethicist ready to administer an anesthetic if they saw any sign of consciousness, which they didn't. Nobody knows what would have happened if the inhibiting drug had not been used. So although there was no sign of organized brain activity (and you wouldn't expect to find any with that inhibiting drug used) the individual cells regained metabolic activity and in the case of neurons electrical activity. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sen.otaku at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 15:18:31 2019 From: sen.otaku at gmail.com (SR Ballard) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:18:31 -0500 Subject: [ExI] Brain Death "paused" In-Reply-To: References: <001a01d4e992$b58498d0$208dca70$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <01A0199D-04FD-4920-A56E-1A6037647DE9@gmail.com> > The scientists involved said they were worried about the brain becoming conscious 4 hours after the pigs were killed in a slaughterhouse, so in the solution they pumped through the brain that provided oxygen sugars and other nutrients they included a drug that inhibits organized 3D brain activity. And they employed a bioethicist ready to administer an anesthetic if they saw any sign of consciousness, which they didn't. Nobody knows what would have happened if the inhibiting drug had not been used. > > So although there was no sign of organized brain activity (and you wouldn't expect to find any with that inhibiting drug used) the individual cells regained metabolic activity and in the case of neurons electrical activity. > > John K Clark TBH, this article is one of the more exciting things I?ve read recently. Really makes me feel like we might be ?getting there? to make cryonics work. SR Ballard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Fri Apr 19 04:05:55 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:05:55 -0700 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! Message-ID: <20190418210555.Horde.WOjdY1DETFNUFQLBjeNPV2o@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> John Clark wrote: > With any sort of wave the longer the wavelength the less energy it > contains, and you're talking about a wave almost as large as the observable > universe. Yes, that is exactly why it is the fundamental frequency of our causal space, because I could not think of a larger wave that could fit in our causal cell. And yes, it is extremely low energy wave but that is why it is the lowest possible energy state within our space-time i.e. the n=0 quantum ground state. The important thing is that it is not zero. Also consider that a wave is more than just energy, it is also quantum information. The energy is like a place holder for the information. >>> *I never claimed dark energy was electromagnetic in nature.* > > > The mystery is not that Dark Energy exists but that it's so weak. It's been > known for many years that electromagnetism should cause Dark Energy but the > calculated strength is so huge the universe would accelerate so fast that a > trillionth of a second after the Big Bang no proton would be closer than a > billion light years from another proton. Needless to say that's not the > universe we live in, it's been called the worse disagreement between theory > and observation in the entire history of science. I think that electromagnetic vacuum energy does cancel out to exactly zero, except as Casimir effects due to *very* local geometry, and Dark Energy is strictly gravitational vacuum energy instead of electromagnetism and that is why it is so comparatively weak. Wheeler called kugelblitzes made of gravitational waves instead of photons geons. >> * > a maximum frequency cutoff can exist even if space-time is >> continuous. Consider this: The shorter the wavelength of a wave, the >> higher the frequency. The higher the frequency of a wave, the higher the >> energy of the wave. The higher the energy of a wave, the more it bends its >> surrounding space-time. If the frequency exceeds 5.23*10^42 Hertz, then >> the wavelength is shorter than the Schwarzschild radius of the wave which >> means that you get a tiny black hole and the wave can't propagate anywhere >> because it is stuck. This is called either a kugelblitz * > > > If spacetime is continuous then there there is always a discernible > different between 2 points regardless of how close together they are, but > if a kugelblitz always forms when you pack enough energy into a small > enough volume then there can't be a detectable difference between the 2 > points and it would be meaningless to say spacetime is continuous. I have to admit that, by your logic, being able to calculate the observed gravitational vacuum energy density from first principles based on frequency cutoffs does raise the posterior probability that space-time is discrete. > And a > kugelblitz can't form unless both Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity > always work the way current textbooks say they do, and everybody agrees > that at the center of a Black Hole at least one of those theories and > probably both breaks down. Why do you you insist there is a center to a black hole but then turn around and deny that that there is a center to the universe? Just as the big bang happened "everywhere at once", so too does the singularity of a black hole if you are falling into it. It is not a place but is instead a time. A time that is in the past for universes and a time that is in the future for a black hole. Universes and black holes are like 3-dimensional spaces wrapped around the time axis so like the perimeter of a circle or the surface of a sphere, they have no "center" even if the surface is expanding or contracting. > > If you assume spacetime is continuous then Dark Energy should be infinitely > strong. If we assume nothing can be smaller than the Planck Time or the > Planck Length things are a little better but not much, then Dark Energy is > not infinite but it would still cause the universe to accelerate 10^120 > faster than what we observe. So something is obviously very very wrong but > nobody knows what. I think that what is wrong is that people think that dark energy is an electromagnetic phenomenon when it is clearly gravitational instead. Gravity is 10^33 times weaker than electromagnetism. I suspect that electromagnetic quantum oscillators completely cancel each other out over long distances while while gravitational quantum harmonic oscillators do not. >> *> Perhaps this is evidence that gravitons are fermions.* > > Nobody has ever detected a graviton it's a purely theoretical construct but > if it exists it must have a spin of 2, and by definition bosons are > particles with integer spin and thus the graviton must be a Boson just like > all the other force carrying particles and be unaffected by the Pauli > Exclusion Principle so an infinite number of them can be in the same > quantum state. Whatever these quantum gravitational harmonic oscillators are, they are not bosons therefore they are probably not gravitons. Could they be CDM particles then? Could CDM particles be fermions? If so, they seem like a good candidate for quantum gravitational harmonic oscillators. Stuart LaForge From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 19 17:50:33 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:50:33 -0700 Subject: [ExI] blackholes@home Message-ID: <003b01d4f6d8$63a05dd0$2ae11970$@rainier66.com> Is this cool or what? https://math.wvu.edu/~zetienne/SENR/ I have always found it crazy amazing how quickly that last little bit of rotational energy bleeds away when two black holes collide. If you do the I * R * omega^2 calculation before the merger and after, we know how to calculate the distance between the two black holes before collision (because we know their masses and their rotational frequency) and we know how far they had to fall inward, even a Newtonian guy can calculate how much energy that was that just went away and (SURPRISE) it agrees with what the LIGO people tell us. But it is a crazy big amount of energy. I confess to having been a flaming unbeliever, but now I found religion on LIGO: that was the most important scientific instrument since Hubble, and in some ways it was more informative than Hubble. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Fri Apr 19 17:52:06 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:52:06 -0700 Subject: [ExI] blackholes@home In-Reply-To: <003b01d4f6d8$63a05dd0$2ae11970$@rainier66.com> References: <003b01d4f6d8$63a05dd0$2ae11970$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <004c01d4f6d8$9c050310$d40f0930$@rainier66.com> I worded that first part incorrectly. It isn't a little bit of rotational energy, it's a huge amount of energy. From: Spike Jones Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 10:51 AM To: 'ExI chat list' Cc: spike at rainier66.com Subject: blackholes at home Is this cool or what? https://math.wvu.edu/~zetienne/SENR/ I have always found it crazy amazing how quickly that last little bit of rotational energy bleeds away when two black holes collide. If you do the I * R * omega^2 calculation before the merger and after, we know how to calculate the distance . spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hibbard at wisc.edu Fri Apr 19 20:31:24 2019 From: hibbard at wisc.edu (Bill Hibbard) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 20:31:24 +0000 Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? Message-ID: I recently had the opportunity to drive a friend's Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor Performance. It's very tempting: 1. Self driving seems to work. 2. Very smart and helpful map display and other internal electronics. 3. Expensive to buy but cheap to operate. 4. Last but surely not least: performance equal to the fastest motorcycle I owned in my youth. Zero to 60 in about 3 seconds without the noise and frantic gear shifting. Just pressed back in the seat and you're over the speed limit quicker than the reaction time of your foot on the accelerator. While we're waiting for significant biological enhancement, a vehicle can feel like an extension of your body. This Tesla is a very seductive extension. But, is buying a Tesla a good idea? Any advice? Bill From foozler83 at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 22:09:17 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:09:17 -0500 Subject: [ExI] randall monroe Message-ID: Has a new book out: How To - Absurd SCientific advice.... bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sparge at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 23:01:45 2019 From: sparge at gmail.com (Dave Sill) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:01:45 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 4:35 PM Bill Hibbard wrote: > I recently had the opportunity to drive a friend's Tesla > Model 3 Dual Motor Performance. It's very tempting: > 1. Self driving seems to work. > "seems to work". Sure, trust your life to it. What could go wrong? :-) > But, is buying a Tesla a good idea? Any advice? > Last I heard, Consumer Reports recommended against the Model 3, in part due to poor braking performance. I'd check with them before forking out $80k. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sat Apr 20 02:47:26 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:47:26 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <007601d4f723$64f8f3e0$2eeadba0$@rainier66.com> Bill look around at the local used market, the 2 yr olds before you decide to buy. spike -----Original Message----- From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Bill Hibbard Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 1:31 PM To: extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org Cc: Bill Hibbard Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? I recently had the opportunity to drive a friend's Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor Performance. It's very tempting: 1. Self driving seems to work. 2. Very smart and helpful map display and other internal electronics. 3. Expensive to buy but cheap to operate. 4. Last but surely not least: performance equal to the fastest motorcycle I owned in my youth. Zero to 60 in about 3 seconds without the noise and frantic gear shifting. Just pressed back in the seat and you're over the speed limit quicker than the reaction time of your foot on the accelerator. While we're waiting for significant biological enhancement, a vehicle can feel like an extension of your body. This Tesla is a very seductive extension. But, is buying a Tesla a good idea? Any advice? Bill _______________________________________________ extropy-chat mailing list extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat From pharos at gmail.com Sat Apr 20 09:52:43 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 10:52:43 +0100 Subject: [ExI] How can a Black Hole spin? Message-ID: Interesting article as Ethan Siegel tackles several black hole questions. "How is angular momentum conserved when stars collapse to black holes? What does it mean for a black hole to spin? What is actually spinning? How can a singularity spin? Is there a "speed limit" to this spin rate and how does the spin affect the size of the event horizon and the area immediately around it?" I won't spoil the article by quoting, but the conclusion reached at the end is worth the effort. :) BillK From msd001 at gmail.com Sat Apr 20 11:45:09 2019 From: msd001 at gmail.com (Mike Dougherty) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 07:45:09 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? In-Reply-To: <007601d4f723$64f8f3e0$2eeadba0$@rainier66.com> References: <007601d4f723$64f8f3e0$2eeadba0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 19, 2019, 10:51 PM Spike Jones wrote: > Bill look around at the local used market, the 2 yr olds before you decide > to buy. > 2 yr olds can't afford cars Oh wait, you are suggesting instead if a Tesla that Bill buy an Oldsmobile? He won't find one from 2 years ago, that company went defunct in 2004. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Sat Apr 20 14:01:36 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 07:01:36 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? In-Reply-To: References: <007601d4f723$64f8f3e0$2eeadba0$@rainier66.com> Message-ID: <003a01d4f781$92ba9410$b82fbc30$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Mike Dougherty Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2019 4:45 AM To: ExI chat list Subject: Re: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? On Fri, Apr 19, 2019, 10:51 PM Spike Jones > wrote: Bill look around at the local used market, the 2 yr olds before you decide to buy. 2 yr olds can't afford cars Oh wait, you are suggesting instead if a Tesla that Bill buy an Oldsmobile? He won't find one from 2 years ago, that company went defunct in 2004. ?harrrrrarrarararararaararrrrr? There is a local consignment lot with several Teslas on it. I was surprised at how low the resale value was. But now maybe they have the early bugs worked out. I was considering a young low-mileage Tesla but haven?t bought one yet. An all-electric is ideal for one who already has a dino-fuel rig for pulling a trailer (I do) and lives in a big suburb (I do.) One?s trips don?t need to be long. A 200 km range is plenty for what I need. Then if I want to go cross country I take the truck. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Sat Apr 20 15:17:53 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 10:17:53 -0500 Subject: [ExI] laugh of the day Message-ID: I answer a lot of questions on Quora. Many of them are really dumb, but this one is laugh out loud funny. "How is society demonstrably better off for being technological?" Should I say that making a better stone axe is technology in action? bill w -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Sat Apr 20 15:35:30 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 08:35:30 -0700 Subject: [ExI] laugh of the day In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000659BA-1D8E-44B1-80A1-A5CB3360E309@gmail.com> On Apr 20, 2019, at 8:17 AM, William Flynn Wallace wrote: > > I answer a lot of questions on Quora. Many of them are really dumb, but this one is laugh out loud funny. > > "How is society demonstrably better off for being technological?" > > Should I say that making a better stone axe is technology in action? The ordinal question though isn?t about making a better one... I mean a stone axe is technology even if it?s never improved, no? It seems to me that technology preceded humans (depending on where one draws the line; were H. erectus humans?) anyhow, so there never were human societies without some technology. But maybe the questioner meant something like technology more advanced than, say, the Paleolithic toolkit. Anyhow, the answer seems obvious. I wonder if many questions asked on Quora aren?t simply some lackadaisical student trying to write a high school essay and figuring that Quora might be a way to get someone else to do it for them. Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Sat Apr 20 20:14:44 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:14:44 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20190420131444.Horde.Gn77OmCaLlQOoOJNAphmB8H@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Bill Hibbert wrote: > I recently had the opportunity to drive a friend's Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor > Performance. It's very tempting: > 1. Self driving seems to work. > 2. Very smart and helpful map display and other internal > electronics. > 3. Expensive to buy but cheap to operate. > 4. Last but surely not least: performance equal to the > fastest motorcycle I owned in my youth. Zero to 60 > in about 3 seconds without the noise and frantic gear > shifting. Just pressed back in the seat and you're over > the speed limit quicker than the reaction time of your > foot on the accelerator. > > While we're waiting for significant biological enhancement, a vehicle can > feel like an extension of your body. This Tesla is a very seductive > extension. > > But, is buying a Tesla a good idea? Any advice? If you do most of your driving in the city and have the money, then yes. Those things have driven drunk people home practically on their own. Not that you would need it for that purpose of course but they are feats of modern engineering in my opinion. I would buy one if I could afford it. Half the hotels around here have free charging stations. Also the Kelley Book Book gives it 4.6 out of 5 stars as as an automobile in general. https://www.kbb.com/tesla/model-3/ So why not? Stuart LaForge From avant at sollegro.com Sat Apr 20 21:09:53 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 14:09:53 -0700 Subject: [ExI] blackholes@home Message-ID: <20190420140953.Horde.HOTt_ufAGBdwzLfiVBFE8kZ@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Spike wrote: > I have always found it crazy amazing how quickly that last little bit of > rotational energy bleeds away when two black holes collide. If you do the I > * R * omega^2 calculation before the merger and after, we know how to > calculate the distance between the two black holes before collision (because > we know their masses and their rotational frequency) and we know how far > they had to fall inward, even a Newtonian guy can calculate how much energy > that was that just went away and (SURPRISE) it agrees with what the LIGO > people tell us. Yup. It's completely astonishing that two singularities can collide so quickly when they are supposedly zero-dimensional point masses that have no cross-sectional area. Of course if you believe that they are true point masses, they could still be orbiting one another after the black holes have merged. Since what happens in a black hole stays in a black hole, we would be none the wiser. > I confess to having been a flaming unbeliever, but now I found religion on > LIGO: that was the most important scientific instrument since Hubble, and in > some ways it was more informative than Hubble. Amen. LIGO is like an invention that created its own whole new category of technology. Like a retina for gravitational waves and its creating a whole new field of science. Gravitometry? Gravitometrics? Gravitoscopy? What do you even call it? Stuart LaForge From spike at rainier66.com Sun Apr 21 04:48:31 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (Spike Jones) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 21:48:31 -0700 Subject: [ExI] blackholes@home In-Reply-To: <20190420140953.Horde.HOTt_ufAGBdwzLfiVBFE8kZ@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <20190420140953.Horde.HOTt_ufAGBdwzLfiVBFE8kZ@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: <010a01d4f7fd$7902cc00$6b086400$@rainier66.com> -----Original Message----- From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Stuart LaForge Subject: Re: [ExI] blackholes at home Spike wrote: .... > I confess to having been a flaming unbeliever, but now I found > religion on > LIGO: that was the most important scientific instrument since Hubble, > and in some ways it was more informative than Hubble. Amen. LIGO is like an invention that created its own whole new category of technology. Like a retina for gravitational waves and its creating a whole new field of science. Gravitometry? Gravitometrics? Gravitoscopy? What do you even call it? Stuart LaForge _______________________________________________ I would call it just crazy cool. Or call it an education in physics all by itself. Or me, I call it a lesson in humility: I thought I knew something about the big bang, but my understanding of it would have ruled out this many mergers this late in the day. Regarding point masses, I have always treated it as equivalent to a mass the size of the event horizon, then pretended that Newtonian physic still mostly works outside that event horizon. But Newtonian physics would not predict two of these guys could spiral inward that quickly. Conclusion: I suck. spike From johnkclark at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 17:25:38 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:25:38 -0400 Subject: [ExI] First Picture of a Black Hole! In-Reply-To: <20190418210555.Horde.WOjdY1DETFNUFQLBjeNPV2o@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <20190418210555.Horde.WOjdY1DETFNUFQLBjeNPV2o@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:12 AM Stuart LaForge wrote: >* I think that electromagnetic vacuum energy does cancel out to > exactly zero, except as Casimir effects due to *very* local geometry* The electromagnetic field is not the only problem, when we try to calculate the vacuum energy density cause by the Higgs field alone it comes out to 10^46 Joules per cubic meter if we assume spacetime is not continuous which we must to avoid getting infinity. If you sum up all the vibrational modes of all known fields using our best methods we calculate a value of 10^113 joules per cubic meter, however the observed value for the vacuum energy is 10^-10 joules per cubic meter. So theory disagrees with observation by a factor of 10^123 assuming spacetime is discrete (which there is no evidence of) and it disagrees by infinity if spacetime is continuous. Science has never made a worse prediction. > > > > *Whatever these quantum gravitational harmonic oscillators are, they are > not bosons therefore they are probably not gravitons. Could they be CDM > particles then? Could CDM particles be fermions? If so, they seem like a > good candidate for quantum gravitational harmonic * That sounds a little like Supersymmetry theory. The idea was that for every fermion we know of there is a corresponding Boson we haven't found yet and for every boson we know of there is a corresponding fermion we haven't found yet. It that was true the vacuum energies should all cancel out and sum up to exactly zero. But the LHC surprised everybody by not showing us even the hint of a Supersymmetric particle, and now we don't want everything to cancel out, we want everything to cancel out EXCEPT for one part in 10^123. Nobody has a clue how to do that. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hkeithhenson at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 03:07:36 2019 From: hkeithhenson at gmail.com (Keith Henson) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:07:36 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Wealth genes Message-ID: "An analysis of 286,000 Britons showed that the genetic make-up of those who earned over ?100,000 differed from those on low incomes." " A scan pointed to 24 ?golden genes? that affect intelligence, the immune system, and the strength of muscles and heart ? and so can make the difference" Keith -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Mon Apr 22 03:36:07 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:36:07 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Wealth genes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000e01d4f8bc$858234b0$90869e10$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Keith Henson Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2019 8:08 PM To: ExI chat list Subject: [ExI] Wealth genes "An analysis of 286,000 Britons showed that the genetic make-up of those who earned over ?100,000 differed from those on low incomes." " A scan pointed to 24 ?golden genes? that affect intelligence, the immune system, and the strength of muscles and heart ? and so can make the difference" Keith Hey cool, now we can select embryos which have lots of those genes. Eventually we get a healthier, wealthier, wiser world. spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 18:57:40 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 13:57:40 -0500 Subject: [ExI] used Tesla for sale Message-ID: Pick up the pieces in the garage and you have a cheap Tesla https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/22/tesla-investigates-video-of-model-s-car-exploding -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Mon Apr 22 19:12:49 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:12:49 -0700 Subject: [ExI] used Tesla for sale In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <008401d4f93f$610bb4c0$23231e40$@rainier66.com> From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 11:58 AM To: ExI chat list Subject: [ExI] used Tesla for sale Pick up the pieces in the garage and you have a cheap Tesla https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/22/tesla-investigates-video-of-model-s-car-exploding Do we have any lithium battery hipsters who can comment on this? spike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pharos at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 20:37:58 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 21:37:58 +0100 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity Message-ID: Nick Bostrom argues in a new paper that the world is not prepared for the development of an easily-accessible creation that could cause the destruction of modern civilization. How to Protect Humanity From the Invention That Inadvertently Kills Us All What happens if we keep opening Pandora's box? By Mike Brown on April 18, 2019 Quotes: Bostrom proposes two key systems. The first would require stronger global governance which goes further than the current international system. This would enable states to agree to outlaw the use of the technology quickly enough to avert total catastrophe, because the international community could move faster than it has been able to in the past. Bostrom suggests in his paper that such a government could also retain nuclear weapons to protect against an outbreak or serious breach. The second system is more dystopian, and would require significantly more surveillance than humans are used to. Bostrom describes a kind of ?freedom tag,? fitted to everyone that transmits encrypted audio and video that spots signs of undesirable behavior. This would be necessary, he argues, future governance systems to preemptively intervene before a potentially history-altering crime is committed. The paper notes that if every tag cost $140, it would cost less than one percent of global gross domestic product to fit everyone with the tag and potentially avoid a species-ending event. It is a chilling set of proposals, particularly in a post-Snowden world. Perhaps the best response is to simply hope that humanity never discovers an easily-accessible technology that would require such a heavy-handed response. ------------ Another reason for the Great Silence? BillK From danust2012 at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 21:10:18 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 14:10:18 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7EB4817A-44CB-48FA-8285-392CAB70D500@gmail.com> > On Apr 22, 2019, at 1:37 PM, BillK wrote: > > Nick Bostrom argues in a new paper that the world is not prepared for > the development of an easily-accessible creation that could cause the > destruction of modern civilization. > > How to Protect Humanity From the Invention That Inadvertently Kills Us All > What happens if we keep opening Pandora's box? > By Mike Brown on April 18, 2019 > > > > Quotes: > Bostrom proposes two key systems. > > The first would require stronger global governance which goes further > than the current international system. This would enable states to > agree to outlaw the use of the technology quickly enough to avert > total catastrophe, because the international community could move > faster than it has been able to in the past. Bostrom suggests in his > paper that such a government could also retain nuclear weapons to > protect against an outbreak or serious breach. > > The second system is more dystopian, and would require significantly > more surveillance than humans are used to. Bostrom describes a kind of > ?freedom tag,? fitted to everyone that transmits encrypted audio and > video that spots signs of undesirable behavior. This would be > necessary, he argues, future governance systems to preemptively > intervene before a potentially history-altering crime is committed. > The paper notes that if every tag cost $140, it would cost less than > one percent of global gross domestic product to fit everyone with the > tag and potentially avoid a species-ending event. > > It is a chilling set of proposals, particularly in a post-Snowden > world. Perhaps the best response is to simply hope that humanity never > discovers an easily-accessible technology that would require such a > heavy-handed response. > ------------ > > Another reason for the Great Silence? > > BillK To save humanity, one has to imprison it? Sounds like a recipe for turn-key despotism. And one imagines this would quickly evolve into the tyranny of the majority. Think of how careers are wrecked now with social media. Then think what would?ve happened to, say, sexually unconventional people of this surveillance regime were in place circa 1950. By the way, on a related note: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190201159.001.0001/acprof-9780190201159 TL; DR: it seems that keeping a low profile makes for progress in civil rights and basic respect. How that applied here: total surveillance would make reaction to such progress more swift and likely to have much more momentum. Wouldn?t a much better approach be to seed humans (or posthumans) around the solar system and beyond? Then there?s no integrated biosphere that might be compromised that would lead to civilization collapse or an extinction event... Also, humans (or posthumans) off Earth might be able to carry out a rescue or reset if Earth has a catastrophe. (Haven?t yet read Bostrom?s paper, so if he covers all this, my apologies.) Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jrd1415 at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 01:59:34 2019 From: jrd1415 at gmail.com (Jeff Davis) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:59:34 -0600 Subject: [ExI] Fermi paradox alive and well Message-ID: A pleasant good morning to all of my Extropian fiends, . I noticed the discussion of the Fermi Paradox a while back, a subject that never disappoints. It's one of my favorites, and I would have joined in, but I got lazy. Then today I happened to run across this YouTube video, and so I decided, "Well heck, let 'er rip." Here's the video, Gordon Cooper talking about his encounters with UFOs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cvzQH5sG04 Since Cooper's a pretty reliable guy, it'd be tough to make his report out to be a hoax. I had a chat with a friend recently and mentioned that it seemed to be the default position that UFOs don't exist. The Fermi Paradox itself ***presumes*** this with the question "Then, where are they?" And it seems like everyone just continues with the presumption, kind of sort of like "Have you stopped beating your wife?" We've had thousands of sightings by completely ordinary -- which is to say "non-whacko" -- people, and bunches of claimed abductions, and yet we always start out with "Then where are they?", studiously ignoring the abundance of unexplained yet undeniable "events". I think we've all banded together, and held tightly to the "We're alone in the universe" notion, out of a long habit of not wanting to be considered nut jobs. Which might very well have been "reasonable" early on. Being considered a nutcase might very well cause you problems in your real life. But now, after thousands of unexplained UFO incidents, it is no longer a reasonable excuse. It should be entirely reasonable at this point to assume that the universe is chock full of intelligent life, that they come round to visit on a regular basis. Consequently, it is no longer unreasonable to accept the possibility of abundant alien life in the universe, and that on that basis the question is just "Why do they refuse to communicate with us?" But no that's not the way it is. We continue to stick with the notion that either we're alone in the universe, the first and only intelligent life, or that if there is other intelligent life out there, we've never seen them. I'm sorry, this doesn't work for me. Not any more. The thousands of sightings, the multiple reports of abductions, the physical examinations, the anal probes, the multiple reports of the blue light that paralyzes, the "expunged" memories that can only be extracted with hypnosis, Betty and Barney Hill, the Nazca lines and "art", the surgically-precise cattle "mutilations" with no blood or footprints nearby,... So, I'm thinking it's time to give up the old default view, fueled by the fear of being considered a nut job, and embrace that third possibility: they're all over the damn place, but for some reason they just don't want to talk to us. Now, a couple more data points. A couple of years back, thinking about this, I realized that a nuclear explosion gives off a unique electromagnetic signature that is a clear indication of technically-advanced intelligent life. No natural phenomenon would cause that "flash". Consequently, every nuclear explosion since Alamogordo has sent out into the universe a little flash that says "Technically-advanced intelligent life is happening here." And while we might very well have been visited by aliens before the nuclear era, the nuclear era had created a flashing "neon sign" for the entire universe to see, and thus provoke more "traffic". When this idea first came to me I thought, well, how likely would it be for alien observers to notice a couple of random flashing blips? What I failed to realize was how very many "flashing blips" the various nuclear powers had actually "flashed". Then, a couple of days ago, I came across this: A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 - by Isao Hashimoto https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY Holy crap! Humanity has been sending out a veritable electromagnetic symphony. And then finally this rather bizarre data point. Anyone who's followed the UFO business is likely to have heard of the "anal probe". When I heard of it, it pretty much settled the issue for me. Clearly the abductees wackos with some underlying sexual weirdness which caused them to have some sort of repressed anal sexual thingy going on. And on that basis I dismissed all the abduction stuff as nonsense. But then about a year ago I began to study up on the microbiome, an emerging area of intense medical interest and research. And so, one day, out of the blue, it hit me like a flash, that those aliens who abducted people to examine and analyze scientifically/medically, taking germ tissue samples and other tissue samples, would absolutely want to take a sample of their microbiome as well. Which explains perfectly the anal probe. And with that observation, the credibility/legitimacy of the abduction reports was reinstated with a vengeance. Aliens would not have to travel to other planets to study physics or chemistry. But biological diversity throughout the universe would certainly provide motivation for coming to places where life had been detected, and cataloging the genetic data from forms of life found there and nowhere else. Without knowing exactly how, that data might very well be of great value. That's it. Enjoy. Glad to get that off my chest. "Everything's hard till you know how to do it." Ray Charles -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Tue Apr 23 05:27:13 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:27:13 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: <565228918.3061572.1555981555507@mail.yahoo.com> References: <565228918.3061572.1555981555507@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20190422222713.Horde.uVu-7mPXaeyffxHpGBMARXo@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> BillK wrote: > Nick Bostrom argues in a new paper that the world is not prepared for > the development of an easily-accessible creation that could cause the > destruction of modern civilization. Mankind has hundreds of millennia of practice destroying things. All the easy ways to kill and destroy have largely been mastered already. I am not going to lose sleep worrying that some budding young genius somewhere is going to figure out a way to uncouple matfrom the Higg's field by using only his cell phone, a pocket-knife, and bubblegum. Furthermore, While it is the nature of civilizations to rise and fall in their own time, relative to previous eras, modern civilization is unusually robust. This is because it is so wide-spread and diversified. Embodied as multiple self-organized nation-states, all using different governance strategies, it is nearly inconceivable that all of modern civilization could be destroyed by any easily-accessible technology. > How to Protect Humanity From the Invention That Inadvertently Kills Us All > What happens if we keep opening Pandora's box? Nothing. The myth of Pandora's box is very clear that upon opening the box once, all the ills packed in box by the gods escaped the box and afflicted humanity. Therefore opening the box again would have no additional effect. Furthermore Pandora's box was designed as a punishment for mankind for accepting the fire of the gods bestowed upon man by Prometheus who was himself punished by Zeus by having his liver eaten on a daily basis by Zeus' eagle. So in short, the fire of the gods has been bought and paid for by the suffering of men and titans alike. I refuse to give up fire because the people who think they run things are afraid. Fear manufactured to justify tyranny is the only invention we need worry about. > > > Quotes: > Bostrom proposes two key systems. > > The first would require stronger global governance which goes further > than the current international system. This would enable states to > agree to outlaw the use of the technology quickly enough to avert > total catastrophe, because the international community could move > faster than it has been able to in the past. Bostrom suggests in his > paper that such a government could also retain nuclear weapons to > protect against an outbreak or serious breach. A one-world government deciding who gets to use what technology does not make us safer, it just puts all our eggs in one basket. A stupid, slow, often irrational, and sometimes downright malign basket. > The second system is more dystopian, and would require significantly > more surveillance than humans are used to. Bostrom describes a kind of > ?freedom tag,? fitted to everyone that transmits encrypted audio and > video that spots signs of undesirable behavior. This would be > necessary, he argues, future governance systems to preemptively > intervene before a potentially history-altering crime is committed. > The paper notes that if every tag cost $140, it would cost less than > one percent of global gross domestic product to fit everyone with the > tag and potentially avoid a species-ending event. No. Absolutely not. Any attempt by ANY government to tag me like some sort of cattle will result in MUCH bloodshed. I am an American who was born free and I would rather die than submit to tyranny. This is non-negotiable. When did Bostrom start subscribing to totalitarian authoritarianism. Did he join the Alt Right Endarkenment? Any government that fears its citizenry this much is not worthy to govern. Paranoia is the last refuge of tyrants and is often the very thing that causes the people to rise up and overthrow that tyrant. Just ask Caligula. In this regard, Bostrom's so-called "freedom tag" might very well be the invention that causes the fall of civilization or the government at the least. I could never condone this, not even if I was the one who got to decide who got to use what technology. > It is a chilling set of proposals, particularly in a post-Snowden > world. Perhaps the best response is to simply hope that humanity never > discovers an easily-accessible technology that would require such a > heavy-handed response. Maybe instead stooping to such despicable depths to preserve the power and privilege of the elite, we should focus on building civilization that doesn't allow the few to oppress the many; a civilization that everybody feels they have a stake in and so nobody would want to destroy. Why would anyone want to live in a civilization so odious that people have to be constantly watched to prevent them from destroying it? Is being the monkey on the highest branch really worth all that? > Another reason for the Great Silence? Do you mean elitist nanny-state politics? Possibly. Or maybe ET just doesn't have anything worth spending so much energy to say. Stuart LaForge From johnkclark at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 16:32:14 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:32:14 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Fermi paradox alive and well In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've seen Unidentified Flying Objects, that is to say I've seen flying objects that I couldn't identify, hell I've even seen things sitting on the ground right next to me I could not identify. But flying saucer fans claim UFO's do not exist because none are unidentified, they've identified them all, they're spaceships driven by people from other planets who travel thousands or millions of light years and then, as Douglas Adams put it they: *"find some isolated spot and land in view of a lone observer. They then strut around wearing antennas on their heads and making beep beep noises, knowing full well that no one will ever believe the poor person."* As for me I find ET's obsession with sticking things up people's asses a little odd, and I think eyewitness testimony is the very weakest sort of evidence. John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danust2012 at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 16:36:23 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:36:23 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Astrophysical detection of the helium hydride ion HeH+ Message-ID: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1090-x Supposedly, the first chemical interaction that took place after the Big Bang, though the stuff found this detection is of more recent vintage. ;) Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pharos at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 19:37:36 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:37:36 +0100 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: <20190422222713.Horde.uVu-7mPXaeyffxHpGBMARXo@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> References: <565228918.3061572.1555981555507@mail.yahoo.com> <20190422222713.Horde.uVu-7mPXaeyffxHpGBMARXo@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 07:43, Stuart LaForge wrote: > > > Mankind has hundreds of millennia of practice destroying things. All > the easy ways to kill and destroy have largely been mastered already. > I am not going to lose sleep worrying that some budding young genius > somewhere is going to figure out a way to uncouple matfrom the Higg's > field by using only his cell phone, a pocket-knife, and bubblegum. > > Furthermore, While it is the nature of civilizations to rise and fall > in their own time, relative to previous eras, modern civilization is > unusually robust. This is because it is so wide-spread and > diversified. Embodied as multiple self-organized nation-states, all > using different governance strategies, it is nearly inconceivable that > all of modern civilization could be destroyed by any easily-accessible > technology. > > Nick Bostrom and his staff at University of Oxford?s Future of Humanity Institute specialise in thinking about existential threats to humanity. He is 'future-thinking' about possible threats and possible solutions. (So no need to panic just yet). :) Current terrorist / deranged human weapons so far are conventional but can still cause much death and destruction. All governments are increasing population surveillance in an attempt to detect these groups / individuals before they cause harm. Bostrom is quite reasonably extrapolating present activities into the future. It does seem likely that weapons (of all types) will become more powerful and more widely available. Also that surveillance will increase. Both developments are too attractive to those involved. BillK > > How to Protect Humanity From the Invention That Inadvertently Kills Us All > > What happens if we keep opening Pandora's box? > > Nothing. The myth of Pandora's box is very clear that upon opening the > box once, all the ills packed in box by the gods escaped the box and > afflicted humanity. Therefore opening the box again would have no > additional effect. Furthermore Pandora's box was designed as a > punishment for mankind for accepting the fire of the gods bestowed > upon man by Prometheus who was himself punished by Zeus by having his > liver eaten on a daily basis by Zeus' eagle. So in short, the fire of > the gods has been bought and paid for by the suffering of men and > titans alike. I refuse to give up fire because the people who think > they run things are afraid. > > Fear manufactured to justify tyranny is the only invention we need > worry about. > > > > > > > Quotes: > > Bostrom proposes two key systems. > > > > The first would require stronger global governance which goes further > > than the current international system. This would enable states to > > agree to outlaw the use of the technology quickly enough to avert > > total catastrophe, because the international community could move > > faster than it has been able to in the past. Bostrom suggests in his > > paper that such a government could also retain nuclear weapons to > > protect against an outbreak or serious breach. > > A one-world government deciding who gets to use what technology does > not make us safer, it just puts all our eggs in one basket. A stupid, > slow, often irrational, and sometimes downright malign basket. > > > The second system is more dystopian, and would require significantly > > more surveillance than humans are used to. Bostrom describes a kind of > > ?freedom tag,? fitted to everyone that transmits encrypted audio and > > video that spots signs of undesirable behavior. This would be > > necessary, he argues, future governance systems to preemptively > > intervene before a potentially history-altering crime is committed. > > The paper notes that if every tag cost $140, it would cost less than > > one percent of global gross domestic product to fit everyone with the > > tag and potentially avoid a species-ending event. > > No. Absolutely not. Any attempt by ANY government to tag me like some > sort of cattle will result in MUCH bloodshed. I am an American who was > born free and I would rather die than submit to tyranny. This is > non-negotiable. When did Bostrom start subscribing to totalitarian > authoritarianism. Did he join the Alt Right Endarkenment? > > Any government that fears its citizenry this much is not worthy to > govern. Paranoia is the last refuge of tyrants and is often the very > thing that causes the people to rise up and overthrow that tyrant. > Just ask Caligula. In this regard, Bostrom's so-called "freedom tag" > might very well be the invention that causes the fall of civilization > or the government at the least. I could never condone this, not even > if I was the one who got to decide who got to use what technology. > > > It is a chilling set of proposals, particularly in a post-Snowden > > world. Perhaps the best response is to simply hope that humanity never > > discovers an easily-accessible technology that would require such a > > heavy-handed response. > > Maybe instead stooping to such despicable depths to preserve the power > and privilege of the elite, we should focus on building civilization > that doesn't allow the few to oppress the many; a civilization that > everybody feels they have a stake in and so nobody would want to > destroy. Why would anyone want to live in a civilization so odious > that people have to be constantly watched to prevent them from > destroying it? Is being the monkey on the highest branch really worth > all that? > > > Another reason for the Great Silence? > > Do you mean elitist nanny-state politics? Possibly. Or maybe ET just > doesn't have anything worth spending so much energy to say. > > Stuart LaForge > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat From danust2012 at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 19:58:13 2019 From: danust2012 at gmail.com (Dan TheBookMan) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:58:13 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: References: <565228918.3061572.1555981555507@mail.yahoo.com> <20190422222713.Horde.uVu-7mPXaeyffxHpGBMARXo@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Message-ID: <2268A9A1-E66B-4F92-945E-A42A54D21DA7@gmail.com> On Apr 23, 2019, at 12:37 PM, BillK wrote: > >> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 07:43, Stuart LaForge wrote: >> >> >> Mankind has hundreds of millennia of practice destroying things. All >> the easy ways to kill and destroy have largely been mastered already. >> I am not going to lose sleep worrying that some budding young genius >> somewhere is going to figure out a way to uncouple matfrom the Higg's >> field by using only his cell phone, a pocket-knife, and bubblegum. >> >> Furthermore, While it is the nature of civilizations to rise and fall >> in their own time, relative to previous eras, modern civilization is >> unusually robust. This is because it is so wide-spread and >> diversified. Embodied as multiple self-organized nation-states, all >> using different governance strategies, it is nearly inconceivable that >> all of modern civilization could be destroyed by any easily-accessible >> technology. > > Nick Bostrom and his staff at University of Oxford?s Future of > Humanity Institute specialise in thinking about existential threats to > humanity. He is 'future-thinking' about possible threats and possible > solutions. (So no need to panic just yet). :) > Current terrorist / deranged human weapons so far are conventional but > can still cause much death and destruction. All governments are > increasing population surveillance in an attempt to detect these > groups / individuals before they cause harm. > Bostrom is quite reasonably extrapolating present activities into the future. I still have yet to read the paper, but my initial fear would be that this would be a quick fix that might be far worse than thing it?s trying to fix in the long run. It could easily result in a surveillance regime that simply quashes all non-conformity ? even stopping research because it might end up being dual use. > It does seem likely that weapons (of all types) will become more > powerful and more widely available. Also that surveillance will > increase. > Both developments are too attractive to those involved. I agree about the attractiveness, but one thing that?s interesting, perhaps, is the level of (non-state*) terrorism appears to be low. Still one can imagine a lone person getting a hold of some biological or nanotechnological agent then releasing it. Perhaps another reason to be careful with assigning likelihoods to such threats is that despite having NBC weapons now and despite much of them being decades behind the cutting edge, there haven?t been any non-state N attacks and very few B or C ones. Regards, Dan Sample my Kindle books at: http://author.to/DanUst * I do count things like the war in Yemen as state terrorism. Ergo the qualifier. From hibbard at wisc.edu Tue Apr 23 21:46:36 2019 From: hibbard at wisc.edu (Bill Hibbard) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 21:46:36 +0000 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity Message-ID: Bostrom propose a surveillance infrastructure to protect us from dangers such as easily accessible bioweapons. However, such an infrastructure, using AI connected via the Internet to the physical devices of our daily lives including implanted electronics, presents a strong temptation of social control to leaders. This is most evident in China. I think they have already passed the tipping point toward a future when every citizen will agree with the government on every issue. Total control. In the US and other countries, leaders and even ordinary citizens are calling for the use of AI to detect and control dangerous speech and "fake news." While I do fear easily accessible bioweapons, social surveillance and control is the "black ball" I fear most, because it is so tempting to the people with the most power. The future of humanity may be a world partitioned into AI data domains (largely coinciding with the partition into nations), with leaders in each partition exercising total surveillance and control via AI and the Internet. I think the best resistance to this future is complete transparency of AI and associated infrastructure. From pharos at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 22:37:58 2019 From: pharos at gmail.com (BillK) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:37:58 +0100 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 22:53, Bill Hibbard wrote: > > Bostrom propose a surveillance infrastructure to > protect us from dangers such as easily accessible > bioweapons. However, such an infrastructure, using > AI connected via the Internet to the physical > devices of our daily lives including implanted > electronics, presents a strong temptation of social > control to leaders. > > This is most evident in China. I think they have > already passed the tipping point toward a future > when every citizen will agree with the government on > every issue. Total control. > > In the US and other countries, leaders and even > ordinary citizens are calling for the use of AI to > detect and control dangerous speech and "fake news." > > While I do fear easily accessible bioweapons, social > surveillance and control is the "black ball" I fear > most, because it is so tempting to the people with > the most power. > > The future of humanity may be a world partitioned > into AI data domains (largely coinciding with the > partition into nations), with leaders in each > partition exercising total surveillance and control > via AI and the Internet. I think the best resistance > to this future is complete transparency of AI and > associated infrastructure. > Quote: The new paper from Bostrom introduces the concept of a vulnerable world : roughly, one in which there is some level of technological development at which civilization almost certainly gets devastated by default. -------- It is controlling the advanced technology that is the problem. Whether misused by rogue states or groups or individuals. It is difficult to see how this control can be achieved in a world where states are seeking to gain decisive advantage and others are resisting. The AI 'Hive-mind' civilisation might be the only survivable route. BillK From atymes at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 23:08:28 2019 From: atymes at gmail.com (Adrian Tymes) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:08:28 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 3:42 PM BillK wrote: > Quote: > The new paper from Bostrom introduces the concept of a vulnerable > world : roughly, one in which there is some level of technological > development at which civilization almost certainly gets devastated by > default. > -------- > > It is controlling the advanced technology that is the problem. Whether > misused by rogue states or groups or individuals. > It is difficult to see how this control can be achieved in a world > where states are seeking to gain decisive advantage and others are > resisting. > The AI 'Hive-mind' civilisation might be the only survivable route. > In all the fear of wild, unfettered destructive technology, is there no consideration of wild, unfettered constructive technology? Just last week I was at a space tech conference wherein I had multiple conversations that could fairly be summarized as, "What happens (legally, or with respect to various government or private programs) if we send mostly automated, self-replicating to a convenient extent, construction bots to the Moon and have them set up human habitation?" Relevant to this topic, would such efforts (if done outside the control of government elites directly profiting from it) not be seen, objected to, and shut down by a government with total surveillance just the same as a terrorist building weapons? To give but one example of specific harm that the proposed change would bring about. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foozler83 at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 23:09:31 2019 From: foozler83 at gmail.com (William Flynn Wallace) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:09:31 -0500 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have my doubts that any state could effectively cut off their people from world news. Techies everywhere can hack satellite signals, or bypass the censors on their version of the Web. Can't they? bill w On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:42 PM BillK wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 22:53, Bill Hibbard wrote: > > > > Bostrom propose a surveillance infrastructure to > > protect us from dangers such as easily accessible > > bioweapons. However, such an infrastructure, using > > AI connected via the Internet to the physical > > devices of our daily lives including implanted > > electronics, presents a strong temptation of social > > control to leaders. > > > > This is most evident in China. I think they have > > already passed the tipping point toward a future > > when every citizen will agree with the government on > > every issue. Total control. > > > > In the US and other countries, leaders and even > > ordinary citizens are calling for the use of AI to > > detect and control dangerous speech and "fake news." > > > > While I do fear easily accessible bioweapons, social > > surveillance and control is the "black ball" I fear > > most, because it is so tempting to the people with > > the most power. > > > > The future of humanity may be a world partitioned > > into AI data domains (largely coinciding with the > > partition into nations), with leaders in each > > partition exercising total surveillance and control > > via AI and the Internet. I think the best resistance > > to this future is complete transparency of AI and > > associated infrastructure. > > > > Quote: > The new paper from Bostrom introduces the concept of a vulnerable > world : roughly, one in which there is some level of technological > development at which civilization almost certainly gets devastated by > default. > -------- > > It is controlling the advanced technology that is the problem. Whether > misused by rogue states or groups or individuals. > It is difficult to see how this control can be achieved in a world > where states are seeking to gain decisive advantage and others are > resisting. > The AI 'Hive-mind' civilisation might be the only survivable route. > > > BillK > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avant at sollegro.com Wed Apr 24 01:04:38 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:04:38 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20190423180438.Horde.RHdTChb-bgNP9ZnaBt_0sql@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Dan Ust wrote: > Wouldn?t a much better approach be to seed humans (or posthumans) > around the solar system and beyond? Then there?s no integrated > biosphere that might be compromised that would lead to civilization > collapse or an extinction event... Also, humans (or posthumans) off > Earth might be able to carry out a rescue or reset if Earth has a > catastrophe. Yes. This is a much better plan to safeguard humanity's legacy than creating a totalitarian world-government that spies on everybody and disappears people who do or say the wrong thing or release too much carbon into the atmosphere. > (Haven?t yet read Bostrom?s paper, so if he covers all this, my apologies.) No. So convinced is he that a monolithic world government with the power to spy on people and peremptorily deprive them of life and liberty is the answer to all the world's problems that colonizing off world doesn't even occur to him. Here is his paper. The meat of his arguments are based on speculative thought experiments premised on counterfactual "what ifs" like "what if you could make nukes out of ordinary materials" as the basis for suggesting reverting the state of human rights back to the dark ages. It's almost as if Stalin commissioned him to write the paper to justify the purges. Far from Bostrom's best work in my opinion. https://nickbostrom.com/papers/vulnerable.pdf Stuart LaForge From avant at sollegro.com Wed Apr 24 03:05:21 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:05:21 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: <1525374971.2354371.1556069913427@mail.yahoo.com> References: <565228918.3061572.1555981555507@mail.yahoo.com> <20190422222713.Horde.uVu-7mPXaeyffxHpGBMARXo@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <1525374971.2354371.1556069913427@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20190423200521.Horde.BSXgpV6RpOysHBcDPvUMLuF@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> BillK wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 07:43, Stuart LaForge wrote: >> Mankind has hundreds of millennia of practice destroying things. All >> the easy ways to kill and destroy have largely been mastered already. >> I am not going to lose sleep worrying that some budding young genius >> somewhere is going to figure out a way to uncouple matter from the Higg's >> field by using only his cell phone, a pocket-knife, and bubblegum. > > Nick Bostrom and his staff at University of Oxford?s Future of > Humanity Institute specialise in thinking about existential threats to > humanity. He is 'future-thinking' about possible threats and possible > solutions. (So no need to panic just yet).? :) I am well aware of who Nick Bostrom is and up until this last piece thought his writings were rather unconventional, thought-provoking, and extropic. > Current terrorist / deranged human weapons so far are conventional but > can still cause much death and destruction. All governments are > increasing population surveillance in an attempt to detect these > groups / individuals before they cause harm. > Bostrom is quite reasonably extrapolating present activities into the future. He is also giving the governments of the world his validation to keep doing more of the same. Encouraging them to institute increasingly draconian measures on all of their citizens (or maybe just most) in order to control for the potential actions of a very few. The governments are perpetrating a great injustice in doing this and justice is one of the primary PURPOSES of government in the first place. > It does seem likely that weapons (of all types) will become more > powerful and more widely available. Also that surveillance will > increase. > Both developments are too attractive to those involved. Which is why I object to Bostrom further encouraging what is already a bad situation. There is more to the solution space of this problem than simply doing what the government has wanted to do all along. Stuart LaForge From avant at sollegro.com Wed Apr 24 03:06:34 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:06:34 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: <1525374971.2354371.1556069913427@mail.yahoo.com> References: <565228918.3061572.1555981555507@mail.yahoo.com> <20190422222713.Horde.uVu-7mPXaeyffxHpGBMARXo@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> <1525374971.2354371.1556069913427@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20190423200634.Horde.9Ghvv9FqLQj-nUVtoU49raW@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> BillK wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 07:43, Stuart LaForge wrote: >> Mankind has hundreds of millennia of practice destroying things. All >> the easy ways to kill and destroy have largely been mastered already. >> I am not going to lose sleep worrying that some budding young genius >> somewhere is going to figure out a way to uncouple matter from the Higg's >> field by using only his cell phone, a pocket-knife, and bubblegum. > > Nick Bostrom and his staff at University of Oxford?s Future of > Humanity Institute specialise in thinking about existential threats to > humanity. He is 'future-thinking' about possible threats and possible > solutions. (So no need to panic just yet).? :) I am well aware of who Nick Bostrom is and up until this last piece thought his writings were rather unconventional, thought-provoking, and extropic. > Current terrorist / deranged human weapons so far are conventional but > can still cause much death and destruction. All governments are > increasing population surveillance in an attempt to detect these > groups / individuals before they cause harm. > Bostrom is quite reasonably extrapolating present activities into the future. He is also giving the governments of the world his validation to keep doing more of the same. Encouraging them to institute increasingly draconian measures on all of their citizens (or maybe just most) in order to control for the potential actions of a very few. The governments are perpetrating a great injustice in doing this and justice is one of the primary PURPOSES of government in the first place. > It does seem likely that weapons (of all types) will become more > powerful and more widely available. Also that surveillance will > increase. > Both developments are too attractive to those involved. Which is why I object to Bostrom further encouraging what is already a bad situation. There is more to the solution space of this problem than simply doing what the government has wanted to do all along. Stuart LaForge From avant at sollegro.com Sun Apr 28 23:26:03 2019 From: avant at sollegro.com (Stuart LaForge) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 16:26:03 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Ball Lightning Message-ID: <20190428162603.Horde.RXZvhk-VPyzKFFa8JL0v7e4@secure199.inmotionhosting.com> Ball lightning is some crazy stuff. I have never seen it personally, but I have read about it my whole life, and thanks to modern cell phones and the Internet, we have a lot of videos of this rare natural phenomenon. Watching these videos, I can completely understand how someone might confuse ball lightning for ET spacecraft. Especially since it can interfere with radio and electronics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPkupFNev50 Stuart LaForge From msd001 at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 01:15:09 2019 From: msd001 at gmail.com (Mike Dougherty) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:15:09 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Primes Message-ID: Prime number gaps https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-prove-conjecture-on-big-prime-number-gaps-20141210 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spike at rainier66.com Tue Apr 30 05:53:53 2019 From: spike at rainier66.com (spike at rainier66.com) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 22:53:53 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Primes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <006201d4ff19$182796e0$4876c4a0$@rainier66.com> Oh this is all so outrageously cool. Thanks Mike! spike From: extropy-chat On Behalf Of Mike Dougherty Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 6:15 PM To: ExI chat list Subject: [ExI] Primes Prime number gaps https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-prove-conjecture-on-big-prime-number-gaps-20141210 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkclark at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 15:30:03 2019 From: johnkclark at gmail.com (John Clark) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:30:03 -0400 Subject: [ExI] Total Surveillance may be necessary to save humanity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 7:27 PM William Flynn Wallace wrote: > I have my doubts that any state could effectively cut off their people > from world news. Techies everywhere can hack satellite signals, or bypass > the censors on their version of the Web. Can't they? > Firewalls sometimes work too well. I hate to say this but China's great wall of internet censorship seems to be working exactly as designed. When students at Beijing University were shown the world famous picture of Tank Man heroically challenging 70 tons of steel during the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre uprising taken just before the massacre started they had no idea of what they were looking at and had never seen it before. And the incident happened right next to the university. Tank Man Man vs. Chinese tank Tiananmen square John K Clark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From park246824 at gmail.com Sun Apr 14 11:03:46 2019 From: park246824 at gmail.com (Jungwhan Park) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 11:03:46 -0000 Subject: [ExI] evolution In-Reply-To: References: <005401d31176$d3c2f9e0$7b48eda0$@rainier66.com> <00c301d31192$239bd930$6ad38b90$@att.net> <009d01d311ea$cddd05b0$69971110$@att.net> <00b801d311ee$1d5896b0$5809c410$@att.net> Message-ID: On 10 August 2017 at 16:34, spike wrote: > > I don?t know what the heck this is, but just as I was leaving for vacation > BillK or someone posted a link to a species identification software site. > I had insufficient bandwidth to download that at the time. If some kind > soul knows that link, I am ready to play with it now. I might be able to > find it again. > After quick and intense search on Wikipedia, I came to a decision that it's very likely a campaea margaritata. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaea_margaritata http://bugguide.net/node/view/13845 And, as you might have noticed, the range described there does not explicitly include Washington. *I'm constantly on a journey of emptying useless(?) folders; this e-mail has been in the drafts folder for more than a year, so I'm sorry about this. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From randy.burkhardt at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 20:56:31 2019 From: randy.burkhardt at gmail.com (Randy Burkhardt) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:56:31 -0700 Subject: [ExI] Opinions on Tesla Model 3? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The thing I would want to check out is battery life, the popular news indicates batteries are not going to be much easier to obtain in the future. Everything else I could deal with, bad circuits, broken stuff. But that's me, I'd love to have one if I could drive it for a good while. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 1:36 PM Bill Hibbard wrote: > I recently had the opportunity to drive a friend's Tesla > Model 3 Dual Motor Performance. It's very tempting: > 1. Self driving seems to work. > 2. Very smart and helpful map display and other internal > electronics. > 3. Expensive to buy but cheap to operate. > 4. Last but surely not least: performance equal to the > fastest motorcycle I owned in my youth. Zero to 60 > in about 3 seconds without the noise and frantic gear > shifting. Just pressed back in the seat and you're over > the speed limit quicker than the reaction time of your > foot on the accelerator. > > While we're waiting for significant biological enhancement, > a vehicle can feel like an extension of your body. This > Tesla is a very seductive extension. > > But, is buying a Tesla a good idea? Any advice? > > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > extropy-chat mailing list > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat > -- Randy (805) 268-7426 ringtones: www.randyburkhardt.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: