[ExI] Molecular Materialism

Brent Allsop brent.allsop at gmail.com
Mon Dec 30 02:07:48 UTC 2019

And it seems like the establishment is doing everything they can to
suppress any idea that their lives have been fruitlessly wasted over ther
"peer reviewed" diarrhea (instead of building and tracking consensus),
misdirecting us into so believing there are so called  "hard" problems.

On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 7:03 PM Brent Allsop <brent.allsop at gmail.com> wrote:

> Will,
> "I actually agree with you by the way."
> Thanks you so much for saying that!  The majority of people just go away
> when their theory has been definitively falsified with simple clear
> arguments, them realizing they aren't the experts they once thought, and
> then they lose interest in the topic altogether.
> Would you mind helping to amplify the wisdom of the crowd and join
> "Representational Qualia Theory." (like signing a petition) or one of it's
> sub camps, to help convince the so called "peer reviewers", many of whom
> are still rejecting this kind of stuff, thinking it is all just too simple
> and not worth the time to figure it out?
> Brent
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 4:46 PM Will Steinberg <steinberg.will at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> That's a whole other rabbithole though!  Why is red the "important"
>> color?  That seems to be getting into some serious value judgment.
>> I actually agree with you by the way.  I think that, for example, animals
>> who can see wider spectrums of light still probably see something like a
>> similar spectrum, just more stretched out.
>> I'm more concerned with the metaphysical origin of those experiences
>> though.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20191229/ef8ec4bc/attachment.htm>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list