[ExI] stealth singularity

[William Flynn Wallace]

  They are just “good” rather than intelligent.  Two different things,
often conflated.



Spike’s postulate: any algorithm we know how to write is not AI, by
definition.


For the first - explanation please.  Your definition of intelligence.

For the second - you mean that humans cannot write software that turns into
AI?  They will have to do it themselves??

As for MS - I hope they include a 'turn the damn thing off' button.


bill w

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:49 AM <spike at rainier66.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> I have long thought of the singularity as being kinda like the Spanish
> Inquisition: it just shows up unexpected, as it did in Monte Python.
>
>
>
> But what if… the more gradual singularity model prevails, analogous to the
> way chess programs just kept getting better and better over the years.  I
> watched that one grow for fifty years.  It would appear to be AI from the
> point of view of a 1970 chess guy, but it isn’t.
>
>
>
> MicroSloth has been experimenting with making Word subtly modify one’s
> writing.  It is nothing shocking: it changes the word “man” to person or
> some gender-neutral version.  Policeman becomes police officer, fireman
> becomes fire fighter.  OK.
>
>
>
> The whole thing has my wheels spinning.  I bet we extrapolate on the idea,
> write software which would modify or translate a passage from politically
> right to left, to prevent writers from being Twitter-banned.  It would
> automatically delete right wing (or left wing) memes, or switch them.  That
> could be a fun game.
>
>
>
> I am not sure how it would work, but I don’t think it really requires AI
> to do it.  The news people are going nuts over it and saying MicroSloth is
> using AI, but it isn’t that, any more than good chess algorithms are AI.
> They are just “good” rather than intelligent.  Two different things, often
> conflated.
>
>
>
> Spike’s postulate: any algorithm we know how to write is not AI, by
> definition.
>
>
>
> A real AI could come into existence, then use that algorithm to cover its
> tracks.  It could disguise itself as a PC-editor, merely seeking to make
> one’s writing politically correct, to prevent triggering the masses.
>
>
>
> Perhaps the singularity could sneak up on us such that when it arrives, no
> one would notice.  Oh, we could make a cubic buttload of money off of this.
>
>
>
> spike
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20190516/d156ec9b/attachment-0001.htm>