[ExI] Four pieces of evidence from before the Big Bang
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 29 00:33:23 UTC 2020
Another silly question from me: universe origin theories are not
scientific, right? No observations possible. I assume the universe as it
is could have been produced several different ways, so there will never be
any solution, any final answer.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:16 PM BillK via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> These 4 Pieces Of Evidence Have Already Taken Us Beyond The Big Bang
> Ethan Siegel Feb 28 2020
> Perhaps the most compelling part of any remarkable story is its
> origin: how it all began. We can take that question back as far as we
> want, asking what came before and gave rise to whatever we were asking
> about previously, until we find ourselves pondering the origin of the
> Universe itself. This is perhaps the greatest origin story of all,
> which occupied the minds of poets, philosophers, theologians and
> scientists for countless millennia.
> It was only in the 20th century that science began to make progress on
> that question, however, eventually resulting in the scientific theory
> of the Big Bang. Early on, the Universe was extremely hot and dense,
> and has expanded, cooled, and gravitated to become what it is today.
> But the Big Bang itself wasn’t the beginning, after all, and we have
> four independent pieces of scientific evidence that show us what came
> before it and set it up.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat