[ExI] shining example and COVID-19
Stuart LaForge
avant at sollegro.com
Mon Mar 23 21:05:22 UTC 2020
Quoting Keith Henson:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:13 PM spike wrote:
>
> snip
>
>> The suggestion was made that we do that for a day. It extended to
>> about a week. We have had enough. You said your piece.
>
> What's amusing is that I made a post that was *much* more politically
> incorrect and it generated no followup comments at all. I have been
> on and off this list since it started. Perhaps the current members do
> not grok what I write about.
Keith, a dear-departed friend of mine once told me that for
philosophers to engage in politics amounted to "getting down in the
mud to wrestle with pigs." Perhaps nobody wanted to mud-wrestle you
over racism?
I understand why you think racism is rational. I would say rather that
it was once convenient but has, with the advent of culture become
obsolete, unnecessary, and ultimately futile. I get EP POV that back
when we were hunter-gatherers, obvious morphological differences were
indicative of less-relatedness and therefore intolerance of
morphological differences was a trait that was, in our distant past,
selected for.
What I am trying to tell you is that memes >> genes at this point in
our natural history. So that you have brothers killing brothers
everywhere that you look: Israeli vs. Palestinian, Northern-Irish
Protestant vs Southern-Irish Catholic, East-side Krips vs. west-side
Bloods.
Racism is these days just one more difference among countless others,
some as arbitrary as the clothing color that you wear that can be used
to justify violence. Is that rational? I don't know . . . is finding
excuses i.e. differences to justify coercion, oppression or violence
against your fellow man rational? In a zero-sum scramble for the
resources of a single planet, maybe. For race to colonize other stars?
Maybe not.
Stuart LaForge
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list