[ExI] Space Mining

Giulio Prisco giulio at gmail.com
Tue Oct 20 06:57:48 UTC 2020


On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:39 AM Stuart LaForge via extropy-chat
<extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>
> Quoting Ben Zaiboc:
>
> > Yes, good points. But, to niggle, I wouldn't call it 'fuel' when it's
> > actually 'reaction mass'. Water is also good for radiation shielding (as
> > is hydrogen if dense enough).
>
> I did not call it fuel. The article John Grigg posted did. :-)
>
> > Not that I think any of this is really relevant, though, because space
> > is not a good place for biology. But I've voiced that opinion enough
> > times now. It seems that space colonisation (by biological humans) is a
> > topic like uploading (except in reverse). No real point arguing about
> > it, given people's resistance to logical argument.
>
>
> I do agree with you that machines would be better suited to outer
> space than biologicals. But colonization of space by biological humans
> is the only rational decision if the alternative is genetic and
> cultural stagnation leading to extinction here on Earth.

Exactly! Thanks Stuart for saying this.

> Being able to leave the Earth, despite all the danger and hardship,
> might be humanity's one saving grace.

YES.


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list