[ExI] Fwd: Help Us Reimagine Energy for the DoD!
Adrian Tymes
atymes at gmail.com
Fri Sep 4 21:36:24 UTC 2020
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 11:53 AM Keith Henson via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> That would make the cost of power a few dollars a kWh.
>
For reliable, uninterruptible power at remote facilities that they don't
need to refuel and only need to ship in a rectenna for (as opposed to a
heavier generator)? Yeah, they'd pay that price.
> I think the scale mismatch problem is so bad that it is not worth
> looking into. But if you are interested (and know how to do it) I am
> willing to check your Excel model if you want to create one. I think
> Seth Potter's 2009 paper has the math you would need.
>
You know how to do it. That's why I'm asking you.
> Such a power satellite would be very different from those considered
> in the past. To decrease the spot size on the ground by a factor of
> ten requires enlarging the transmitter in GEO by the same factor. So
> a 1 km transmitting antenna becomes 10 km, 100 times the area. The
> much lower power density would prevent thermal problems.
>
Or, same size spot on the ground, and just use a much lower power density.
They can claim land if needed.
If you think these numbers are acceptable to the military, and you
> want to sell them on the idea, I can introduce you to Paul Jaffe.
>
No, the point is to get you or Paul to sell them on the idea. You
(collectively) have the data necessary to do this sales job. I may have
important pieces that you apparently do not, but I am not the one who can
sell them on this. They want to talk to the experts directly, and that is
you and Paul.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20200904/37c7cfd1/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list