[ExI] glass fire
spike at rainier66.com
spike at rainier66.com
Wed Sep 30 23:43:43 UTC 2020
From: Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 4:35 PM
To: ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
Cc: spike <spike at rainier66.com>
Subject: Re: [ExI] glass fire
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020, 4:14 PM spike jones via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> > wrote:
With a converging nozzle, you have a lot of range.
>…I think this is the disconnect. Calculate the range, and thus the area covered per installation - even ignoring all those buildings and/or trees in the way, which reduce the area.
>…Compare to the area of, say, Napa County - assuming you wished to protect a large area, rather than just one winery. Maybe just the non-wilderness area…
Ja, the strategy is to protect just the structures but let the forest burn. It would be all about the structures, and not even all of those: just the ones worth a few thousand bucks to eliminate the 50-year fire risk. It could be there just aren’t that many structures worth a few k to protect.
spike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20200930/2c67037a/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list