[ExI] Social Media Bans

[SR Ballard]

X is not speech, so I was not talking about it when I referred to Free Speech. 

But to answer your implicit question, “Do you think Child Rape should be legally protected, to create and distribute?” No, I do not. 

And yes, distribution might be technically different than creation, however, Pedophiles who watch child rape online are more likely to (re) offend.

“Pornography use and sexual aggression: the impact of frequency and type of pornography use on recidivism among sexual offenders.”

“Most importantly, after controlling for general and specific risk factors for sexual aggression, pornography added significantly to the prediction of recidivism.”

“ content of pornography (i.e., pornography containing deviant content) was a risk factor for all groups.” 

[deviant obviously includes child rape]

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Pornography-use-and-sexual-aggression%3A-the-impact-Kingston-Fedoroff/bf65fc41f69b0022b06849975f13e3a5741c8650

SR Ballard

> On Aug 8, 2021, at 10:16 PM, Anton Sherwood via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2021-8-05 18:02, SR Ballard via extropy-chat wrote:
>> It’s not free speech to share child porn.
>> It is free speech to talk about disgusting things.
> 
> When you say "X is not free speech,"[*] do you mean
> X is not protected (according to case law), or
> X ought not to be protected (despite case law), or
> something else?
> 
> The obvious example of unfree speech is parroting Official Truth under compulsion, but I doubt that's meant here.
> 
> [*] more often X is "hate speech".
> 
> -- 
> *\\*  Anton Sherwood  *\\*  www.bendwavy.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20210808/76d10eb1/attachment.htm>