[ExI] the science might be wrong

[William Flynn Wallace]

Maybe these little thin masks just don't do the job. My wife read that if
you double them you do get some protection.  And why were N 95 masks touted
if there wasn't any data showing their protective ability?  And what about
the Kansas data I cited earlier?  Massive differences between counties that
did or did not agree to a mask directive?  Biggest question:  why isn't
there hard scientific data on this question?  Claims by chat members are
one thing, and hard data is another.   bill w

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:55 PM spike jones via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *>…* *On Behalf Of *Stathis Papaioannou via extropy-chat
>
>
> >…OK, you have made your position clear. You think compulsory public
> health measures would be so bad that it is better to let people die.
>
> --
>
> Stathis Papaioannou
>
>
>
>
>
> No.  Compulsory health measures would be perfectly OK if we know that
> people will die without them.  We don’t know that.  Compulsory health
> measures might demand stuff that kills people.
>
>
>
> spike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20210121/7f8992d7/attachment.htm>