[ExI] the science might be wrong

[spike at rainier66.com]

>…And what about the Kansas data I cited earlier? BillW

 

The CDC should look into that again.  They reported 100% increase in case rate in non-mask Kansas counties based on a daily infection rate that went from 6 to 12 in the study period.  That study was published before the real action happened however:

 

 

 

 



 

 

The CDC hasn’t said much about Kansas recently.  I don’t know what the story is there now.

 

spike

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: spike at rainier66.com <spike at rainier66.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 5:16 PM
To: 'ExI chat list' <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
Cc: spike at rainier66.com
Subject: RE: [ExI] the science might be wrong

 

 

 

>… On Behalf Of William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat
Subject: Re: [ExI] the science might be wrong

 

>…Maybe the mask-wearing did not change that much after the 

mandate, eh?  I don't consider that good data.  Billw

 

How about this:

 

 

 



 

spike

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20210121/5c464813/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 31225 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20210121/5c464813/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 107344 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20210121/5c464813/attachment-0003.jpg>