[ExI] New Bioscience Company Raises $15 Million to Revive Woolly Mammoth
bronto at pobox.com
Thu Sep 16 19:59:24 UTC 2021
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:51 PM Anton Sherwood wrote:
> Yes, by all means let's use any old word that more or less resembles
> what we mean, everyone will know what we mean.
On 2021-9-16 12:00, Dave Sill via extropy-chat wrote:
> What part of the following is unclear?
> "The Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, Collins English Dictionary
> and the Oxford Dictionaries regard the form /comprised of/ as standard
> English usage."
Does that mean that preferring more conservative usages, when they
preserve useful distinctions, is NOT allowable?
> There's ample room for ambiguity in proper English. Assuming that
> everyone is using the same dictionary that you're using is a good way to
> introduce it.
Hence, a careful writer will not rely only on the most liberal
dictionaries when choosing words.
What ambiguity do I introduce by refusing to use 'comprise' as a synonym
> Usage changes over time. Railing against it is silly and futile.
I know it's futile to seek to change how the masses speak and write; my
remarks are intended for the minority who aspire to more precision.
"Read liberally, write conservatively," to paraphrase a computing proverb.
*\\* Anton Sherwood *\\* www.bendwavy.org
More information about the extropy-chat