[ExI] cart before horse

[Adrian Tymes]

It is...kind of.  Not too long ago, in Timbs vs. Indiana, the Supreme Court
voted unanimously to at least start putting limits on disproportionate
seizures.

Also, the specific objection you're thinking of is closer to perjury: that
they could swear in court that there was a reasonable suspicion you
obtained the money illegally, when you can show that no such reasonable
suspicion exists from merely carrying large amounts of money to a car
dealership.

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:11 PM William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

> Why isn't that law unconstitutional?  It assumes that a person is guilty
> of drug dealing with no proof but the money.  bill w
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:58 PM Dave Sill via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:39 PM MB via extropy-chat <
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> My neighbor bought a new car with cash.
>>>
>>
>> Assuming we're talking about actual paper currency, carrying large
>> amounts is very dangerous due to the practice of Civil Asset Forfeiture.
>> Cops can take and keep it on the grounds that they think it was obtained
>> illegally.
>>
>> -Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20210916/583454d7/attachment.htm>