[ExI] chinese fires, was:RE: book review

spike at rainier66.com spike at rainier66.com
Thu Dec 1 00:56:11 UTC 2022



…> On Behalf Of Stathis Papaioannou via extropy-chat
Subject: Re: [ExI] chinese fires, was:RE: book review




On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 10:51, spike jones via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> > wrote:


The federal cops, the FBI, was caught and convicted of falsifying evidence.  They never really did anything to the guy.  Of course that is going to arouse suspicion.  Now we know the FBI falsifies evidence.  The locals do not.

>…It is possible for an official, legislator or judicial officer to be honest yet have values contrary to your own. For example, there are probably Taliban officials who are extremely fair in applying Sharia law, while there may be others who can be bribed or are just lazy and don’t really care.


Stathis Papaioannou




I see, so falsifying evidence is… what Stathis?  Kinda OK if it agrees with sharia law and the guy who falsified the evidence is… what please?  Do explain why we should think there is any justification or any way we can consider it honest or ethical or legal or any other form of justification for the FBI to falsify evidence.  


The FBI falsified evidence.  They caught the guy.  Did almost nothing to him.  Now… the FBI falsifies evidence.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20221130/19a899c4/attachment.htm>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list