[ExI] bitcoin again

spike at rainier66.com spike at rainier66.com
Fri Nov 25 15:10:47 UTC 2022


 

Do pardon my naïve queries and thanks to all who have the patience to
educate a well-meaning geezer.

 

I was with my college buddies yesterday for our annual festival of gratitude
for
 well pretty much everything that has happened to us.  We have been a
very fortunate generation.

 

The subject of FTX came up.  I am no hipster on that subject but I have
friends who are (you) and they don’t.  They are all geezers too.  So we
shared our misconceptions, and I came up with a new one, of which perhaps
some young hipster among us can disabuse me.

 

I offered a thought experiment where one imagines itself as a federal judge
with a courtroom full of angry defrauded investors in FTX.  Its Honor is
about the age I am now.  Its Honor listens to the plaintiffs talk about how
they gave their money to this Bankman Fried who then stole their money.  

 

Its Honor asks the obvious: SBF stole your money?  

 

Plaintiffs: he stole our deposits, which weren’t actually in the form of
cash fiat money.

 

It: You deposited gold coins or physical assets?

 

They:  Well no, not exactly, but an equivalent.

 

It: Do explain yourselves please.

 

They: we bought the BitCoin from him with fiat money, he gave us the
cryptokeys to the digital currency we bought.  That part was fair game.
Then we deposited the BitCoin with him.  He told us he is not a banker,
disregard his name, he is a digital currency exchange.  He buys and sells
digital currency, changes one to another only.  It is an digital currency
exchange.  Bankman doesn’t operate a bank, man.

 

It: Ah, so he didn’t actually steal your fiat currency.  He stole your
BitCoins?

 

They: he went off and invested it in risky stuff, some safe bets such as
American retail politicians, but that BitCoin is gone now.

 

It:  I see.  So
 this Bankman Fried stole your
em
 numbers?

 

They:  Our BitCoins, ja.

 

It:  So
 he stole intellectual property, so you should taking this up with
the copyright office?

 

They:  Your Honor, he stole our MONEY!

 

It:  So
 you claim that your numbers are
 money?

 

They:  Ja.

 

It: Can you buy groceries or pay or taxes with this digital money?

 

They:  Now one must exchange it for fiat money first.

 

It:  So this case is about prosecuting this sleazy wretched swindler for
stealing these numbers you say are money?

 

They:  Ja.

 

It:  BANG {slams big wooden hammer on desk {why are they still doing that?}}
Out of my courtroom, all of yas.

 

Based on that thought experiment, I made a prediction for my geezer friends:
Bankman Fried will not go to prison.  No reasonable prosecutor will take
this case (because she was probably on SBF’s payroll.)  He invested in all
the right retail politicians, they will say something analogous to our
federal judge in the thought experiment above.

 

My geezer friends then pointed out that Bankman Fried did not pay taxes on
his
 numbers.  I immediately responded: I retract and reverse previous
prediction.  They will roast his ass bigtime.

 

spike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20221125/266771a8/attachment.htm>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list