[ExI] bitcoin again
Adrian Tymes
atymes at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 19:00:22 UTC 2022
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 10:57 AM spike jones via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> *On Behalf
> Of *Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat
> *…*
>
> It: BANG {slams big wooden hammer on desk {why are they still doing
> that?}} Out of my courtroom, all of yas. spike
>
>
>
> >…Doesn't follow. The numbers are themselves property - not "intellectual
> property", but ordinary property even if in a non-physical form…
>
>
>
>
>
> I agree Adrian, you know it, I know it, everyone here knows it. My
> prediction is that the criminal courts will not accept the liability of
> enforcing ownership law on cryptocurrency. I predict they will just tell
> crypto holders they are on their own: homemade currency, homemade security
> to protect it.
>
I disagree. Property is property, homemade or not.
If the courts ruled otherwise, that opens way too many run-arounds of
existing law.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20221125/92fd10d7/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list