[ExI] all we are is just llms was: RE: e: GPT-4 on its inability to solve the symbol grounding problem
ben at zaiboc.net
Fri Apr 21 07:39:13 UTC 2023
On 21/04/2023 05:28, Gordon Swobe wrote:
> LLMs have no access to the referents from which words derive their
> meanings. Another way to say this is that they have no access to
> experiences by which symbols are grounded.
Really Gordon? Still?
Did you watch that video? Did you read what I wrote about it? (the bit
about 'language', not the excitable hype about the singularity, which I
expect you to dismiss).
If so, and you still stand by the above, please explain how (apart from
one being biological and the other not) the inputs that GPT-4 and the
inputs that human brains receive, are different?
Our previous discussions were based on the misunderstanding that these
LLMs only received text inputs. Now we know that's not true, and they
receive text, visual, auditory, and other types of input, even ones that
humans aren't capable of.
Plus we are told they do use internal models, which you agreed that our
'grounding' is based on.
So LLMs *do* have access to the referents from which words derive their
So why do you still think they don't? They have just as much access as
we do, and more, it seems.
Again, I'm making no claims about their consciousness, as that is a
thing yet to be defined, but they definitely have the basis to 'ground'
the symbols they use in meaningful models constructed from a variety of
sensory inputs. Just like humans.
Or are you moving your own goalposts now, and claiming, (by shifting to
the term 'experiences') that referents must be based on conscious
experience? Because that wasn't your argument before.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat