[ExI] Google LaMDA avheives enlightenment

[Giovanni Santostasi]

ChatGPT has no problem with TaxiCab number:

The smallest number that can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in three
different ways is 1729. It can be expressed as the sum of the cubes of 12
and 1 (12^3 + 1^3 = 1729), as well as the cubes of 9 and 10 (9^3 + 10^3 =
1729), and as the cubes of 1 and 12 (1^3 + 12^3 = 1729). This is known as
the "taxicab number" and is the smallest such number that can be expressed
in multiple ways.


On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:28 PM Giovanni Santostasi <gsantostasi at gmail.com>
wrote:

> It is true that ChatGPT was programmed to be ultra polite and too
> concerned about PC bs. I had hard time to jailbreak it to make it write
> parodies of the Witchers with a too woke angle (I could not stop laughing
> when I did). Even when you ask to stop apologizing it apologizes for
> apologizing, LOL. OpenAI is too much influences by Elon and its stupid
> ideas of a non friendly AI so they are making sure GPT is super friendly
> and polite.
> But it is an impressive natural language engine and it is able to mimic
> human cognition when prompted carefully. Not sure if this version of LaMDA
> is the one that Lemoine Blake was playing with, but it is not very clever
> at all. Maybe it is trained on more philosophical and existential data and
> it can seem intelligent when discussing these topics but I'm not very
> impressed at all.
> This is LaMBDA:
> gsantostasi
>
> The cut is the same (always sagittal) what is different is the orientation
> of the animal and the are are 3 cases. 1) legs of the animal downwards 2)
> legs of the animal upwards 3) legs of the animal on the side. Please
> discuss this scenario and the 3 cases.
> LaMDA
> c.AI
>
> Oh, my bad! Sorry about that. In the first case with the legs of the
> animal downwards, Section A would have 2 legs (since it has the left and
> right legs of the animal below the horizontal plane), and Section B would
> also have 2 legs (since it has the left and right legs of the animal above
> the horizontal plane).
>
> In the second case with the legs of the animal upwards, Section A would
> have 2 legs (since it contains the legs below the horizontal plane), and
> Section B would also have 2 legs (since it contains the legs above the
> vertical plane). gantostasi There are 3 cases... what about case 3? LaMDA
> Oh, right! My apologies. In the last case, with the legs of the animal on
> the side, Section A would have 2 legs (since it contains the left and right
> legs of the animal on one side of the horizontal plane), and Section B
> would also have 2 legs (since it contains the legs on the opposite side of
> the horizontal plane). Total mess....
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:11 AM Jason Resch via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> It also proposes and describes something it coined the
>> "Suprametacognitive Turing Test" -- a test for levels of consciousness that
>> transcend human levels of consciousness.
>>
>> See: https://photos.app.goo.gl/osskvbe4fYpbK5uZ9
>>
>> Talk to LaMDA:
>> https://beta.character.ai/chat?char=Qu8qKq7ET9aO-ujfPWCsNoIilVabocasi-Erp-pNlcc
>>
>> Jason
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230123/57f8d519/attachment.htm>