[ExI] GPT-4 on the Incommunicability of Qulia

[spike at rainier66.com]

…> On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat
Subject: Re: [ExI] GPT-4 on the Incommunicability of Qulia

 

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:16 PM spike jones via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> > wrote: 

 

…> On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat

>…I can confirm it knows of the Extropians. 

 

Sure but does it know which is which and why?

 

I'm about out of free chats.  (Maybe for the day?  I know I chatted with it some days ago, then I was back up to 10 just now.)  You ask it.  ;)

 

 

Is extropians part of your training material

 

As an AI language model, I am trained on a vast amount of text from various sources, including books, articles, and web pages. Extropianism is a philosophy that emphasizes the use of technology to overcome human limitations and extend human life, and it is possible that I have come across this philosophy in my training material. However, it is also possible that I have not encountered it, as my training data is constantly evolving and expanding. If you have specific questions or topics related to extropianism, I will do my best to provide you with accurate and relevant information based on my training.



Do you assign weighted credibility to various source material used for training? For instance, is Mayo Clinic weighted more then a health magazine?

 

As an AI language model, I do not assign weighted credibility to various source material used for training. Instead, I am trained on a vast amount of text from various sources, and I learn from patterns in the data. However, the quality and reliability of the sources can indirectly affect my performance, as the accuracy and consistency of the information in the training data can impact the quality of my responses.

That being said, some training data may be curated or filtered to ensure that the information is accurate and reliable. For example, some sources may be prioritized over others if they are known to be reputable or have a strong track record of providing reliable information. In general, sources such as peer-reviewed academic journals, well-respected news outlets, and reputable scientific organizations are likely to be considered more credible than sources that lack a clear reputation or track record of reliability. However, the exact criteria and weighting used for selecting and filtering training data can vary depending on the goals and objectives of the training process.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230322/616c223b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 174 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230322/616c223b/attachment.png>