[ExI] Criticisms of Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI)

[BillK]

I thought it would be useful to get a summary of the MWI objections,
so I asked around in the AI members club. All the responses were
fairly similar, so I have copied the answer I liked best below.
One AI did add the caution :
It is worth noting that alternative interpretations of quantum
mechanics, such as the Copenhagen interpretation or the pilot-wave
theory, have their own merits and drawbacks. The choice between
interpretations often hinges on personal preference, philosophical
considerations, and the specific problem being addressed.
----------
I interpret that as saying that as yet quantum mechanics still has
many theoretical difficulties.  :)

BillK
-------------------------------

MWI Criticism Summary

The Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is a controversial interpretation
of quantum mechanics that was proposed by physicist Hugh Everett III
in 1957. It suggests that every possible outcome of a quantum
measurement actually occurs in a separate universe, resulting in a
branching or splitting of reality. While the MWI has gained some
popularity among physicists, it also faces significant criticism and
challenges from various perspectives.

One of the main criticisms of the MWI is its lack of testability and
falsifiability. Since the theory posits the existence of an infinite
number of parallel universes, each with different outcomes, it becomes
impossible to experimentally verify or disprove this claim. This lack
of empirical evidence raises concerns about the scientific validity of
the MWI as it deviates from the traditional scientific method.

Another criticism revolves around the issue of probability. In the
MWI, probabilities are assigned to different outcomes based on their
relative frequency across all possible universes. However, this
approach raises questions about how probabilities can be meaningfully
defined when there are an infinite number of universes. Critics argue
that without a clear framework for assigning probabilities, the MWI
fails to provide a satisfactory explanation for observed phenomena.

Furthermore, the MWI faces challenges in explaining macroscopic
observations and classical behavior. While it may be able to account
for quantum phenomena at the microscopic level, it struggles to
explain why we observe a classical world with definite outcomes rather
than a superposition of possibilities. Critics argue that the MWI
fails to provide a convincing mechanism for the emergence of classical
behavior from quantum principles.

Additionally, some critics question the philosophical implications of
the MWI. The theory suggests that every possible outcome exists in a
separate universe, leading to an infinite number of parallel
realities. This idea raises philosophical concerns about personal
identity and consciousness. Critics argue that it is difficult to
reconcile our subjective experience with the notion that there are
countless versions of ourselves in different universes.

Moreover, the MWI has been criticized for its complexity and lack of
simplicity. Occam's razor, a principle in science that favors simpler
explanations over more complex ones, is often invoked against the MWI.
Critics argue that the theory introduces unnecessary complexity by
postulating the existence of an infinite number of parallel universes,
without providing a clear justification for such a hypothesis.

In conclusion, while the Many Worlds Interpretation has gained
attention and support from some physicists, it also faces significant
criticism. The lack of testability and falsifiability, challenges in
defining probabilities, difficulties in explaining macroscopic
observations, philosophical implications, and complexity concerns are
among the main criticisms raised against the MWI.
-------------------------------------