[ExI] UK now jailing people for unapproved online posts
Ben Zaiboc
ben at zaiboc.net
Tue Aug 20 11:12:32 UTC 2024
When someone says something like "won't someone rid me of this
troublesome priest?", or prints and sells T-shirts with the words "Don't
miss next time!", this can be considered an expression of ill-will
towards an implied someone. In other words, an opinion. It might be in
bad taste, but that shouldn't be a crime.
On the other hand, when someone sticks a sword through someone else, or
shoots someone in the head, these are crimes of violence, and whether or
not the utterance or T-shirt could be said to be the thing that prompts
the action, it's always the deed, not the word, that should be
considered a crime.
Unfortunately, it's often a lot easier to persecute and prosecute people
who can be interpreted as encouraging a crime, than the actual
perpetrators of the crime. So we get police and politicians who
concentrate on the much easier task of vilifying and prosecuting people
who are exercising free speech, diverting attention and effort away from
catching the actual criminals.
This is why, I think, we get this continual effort to erode the right of
free speech. Effectively, it's laziness (to be charitable, and not
assume that it's a deliberate strategy to erode freedom (which is
probably getting too paranoid. Probably)).
Problems with violence among teenagers? Blame violent videogames, and
ban, censor or restrict them.
Want to stop rapes? Make pornography illegal, and censor any mention or
depiction of rape (or, if you want to be really ridiculous, nudity) on
social media.
Want to stop child abuse? Make cartoons and stories depicting (or that
can be interpreted as depicting, or implying) child abuse, illegal.
Job done, at a fraction of the cost and effort of actually tackling the
crimes. Never mind that the real bad guys continue to do bad things.
Never mind the harmful side-effects (like restricting access to rape
victim support services). As long as you're seen to be 'doing something
about it', you're golden.
It's pathetic, and sickening, and dangerous. Not to mention totally
ineffective (at stopping the crimes, but it's brilliant for eroding
people's freedoms).
Ben
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list