[ExI] Open Individualism

[Jason Resch]

On Sat, Jan 6, 2024, 10:55 AM Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024, 7:21 AM William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> I want someone else to say:  this is not science.
>>
>
> This is not science.  "Open individualism" has been redefined in this very
> discussion, in a moving-the-goalposts fashion with no acknowledgement that
> said redefinition happened, when it was shown to conflict with what
> evidence could be mustered.
>


I think you should follow up on my replies, which you seem to have missed.

Jason


> Here's the danger:  I am a bit of an expert on Freud.  You have to watch
>> him.  Ideas presented as possibilities on one page are referred to in later
>> pages as fact.
>>
>
> As commonly happens.  "I presented a thing, and people who were objecting
> at first stopped objecting, so I must be right," ignoring any other reason
> (such as exhaustion, or - in your example - lack of opportunity to object)
> why said objections might have temporarily stopped.
>
_______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20240106/6ed140f0/attachment.htm>