[ExI] Fwd: Open Individualism

[William Flynn Wallace]

thought experiments I've
provided which demonstrate it's truth, however, if that makes you feel
better. jason

SCientific proof is not provided by thought 'experiments'.  No value
of 'true'.  billw


On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 7:30 AM Jason Resch via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 6:01 AM Ben Zaiboc via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 18/01/2024 16:06, Jason Resch wrote:
>>
>> Ben Wrote:
>>>
>>>     From what I can see, none of what you claim about Open Individualism
>>>     is based on scientific principles,
>>>
>> It  corresponds to thought experiments (i.e., logic and rationality better
>> than the alternatives). It corresponds to Occam's razor better than the
>> alternatives, as it makes fewer assumptions, it corresponds to laws of
>> probability better than the alternatives, which are exceedingly
>> improbable compared to it. You can keep repeating to yourself that it's
>> not scientific, and continue to ignore the thought experiments I've
>> provided which demonstrate it's truth, however, if that makes you feel
>> better.
>>
>>
>> That might be the best course. Your thought experiments don't make any
>> sense to me, and apart from making some people feel better about their
>> lives, I still see no practical use of the idea, or any way to prove or
>> disprove it.
>>
>
>
> If they make no sense you should ask clarifying questions. I said I would
> explain/answer anything I could.
>
>
> Jason
>
> P.S.
>
> Why do you create a new thread with every reply?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20240119/7782a779/attachment.htm>