[ExI] immortal

[Adrian Tymes]

On Sun, Aug 3, 2025 at 8:32 PM Jason Resch via extropy-chat
<extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> These constraints apply to all classical computing architectures physically realizable given the laws of this universe.

Classical, perhaps.  Once upon a time, that would have included vacuum
tubes and that's it.  Likewise, they now include every architecture
that you can imagine - but you have no evidence that that is every
possible computing architecture, only the "classical" ones.

> Did you review any of the links I sent?

They say nothing about the objection I stated.  They are non sequiturs.

>> > So it will take another 112 doublings of current computer speed to get there. Over the past century the trend has been fairly consistent of computing technology doubling roughly every 18 - 24 months
>>
>> Even if we were to constrain ourselves to traditional electronics,
>> Moore's Law has been pointed out as not necessarily holding steady -
>> and it's been an economic law, not a physical one.
>
> I think it is more generally a property of recursively improving systems.

You based your claim on observations of, specifically, electronic
computers under Moore's Law.  Escaping to generality in this manner
voids your ability to place specific numbers on it.