[ExI] Summary - Many Worlds versus Super-determinism

[Adrian Tymes]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:03 PM BillK via extropy-chat
<extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 at 22:46, Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>> Checking the link, you start the QM-relevant part of the discussion
>> (after a question on financial debt) with, "can you explain
>> superdeterminism and explain why most physicists reject it".  As you
>> know, if you include a conclusion in the question like that, the AI
>> will tend to reach that conclusion.
>
> Yes, that's correct. It was quite a long session, with several different questions.
> I didn't know that the Share link would link the whole session rather than just the last question.
> Read on down to the last question.  :)

Problem is, if you bias it early on like that, subsequent answers in
the same session will remain tainted and may not be accurate.  (Unless
the initial bias was completely accurate, but then it wouldn't be a
"bias" in most senses.)