[ExI] Google’s Willow Quantum Chip: Proof of the Multiverse?

[Jason Resch]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 11:48 AM BillK via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 at 13:29, Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>> Sure it is.  Assuming the existence of other universes that magically
>> split apart and can never interact with ours, and yet still manage to
>> produce results we can observe anyway, seems sillier.
>> ______________________________________________
>>
>
>
> Hi Adrian,
> Yesterday, when Kimi was asked to compare the Multiverse with
> Superdeterminism, it preferred the MWI option due to the severe problems
> posed by superdeterminism.
>
> Today, I never mentioned superdeterminism, but just asked Kimi to consider
> how unlikely the multiverse is, as in your comment above. Kimi agreed with
> you, but did not suggest superdeterminism as the alternative. Kimi
> discussed the problems with MWI and concluded that at present, we don't
> know how to solve the measurement problem. We await further research on
> this mystery.  :)
> BillK
> Click the link to view conversation with Kimi AI Assistant <
> https://www.kimi.com/share/19a73bad-87d2-8674-8000-000039699934>
> (I've checked the link this time!)
>

I had a similar conversation with an AI on the topic of many-worlds. At the
end of the conversation the AI was 99.99% sure many-worlds was correct:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i15TT76PMYlOdMO76O_TYPML2ocHrlzYDdj2fPkguH0/edit?usp=sharing

This either shows that many-worlds is most probably true, or that current
AIs are so swayable that we shouldn't put much stock in what they say about
controversial subjects.

Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20251111/4d7b6ad8/attachment.htm>